Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Container Registry Logo

Azure Container Registry Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Azure Container Registry?

Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

Get the Azure Container Registry Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Azure Container Registry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), JFrog Container Registry and more!
Azure Container Registry is the #4 ranked solution in top Container Registry solutions. PeerSpot users give Azure Container Registry an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Azure Container Registry is most commonly compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI): Azure Container Registry vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Azure Container Registry is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Azure Container Registry
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Featured Azure Container Registry reviews

Read more reviews

Azure Container Registry mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Azure Container Registry in the Container Registry category stands at 12.1%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure Container Registry12.1%
JFrog Container Registry28.4%
Harbor26.0%
Other33.5%
Container Registry

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Container Registry reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContainer RegistryDec 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Container Registry vs JFrog Container RegistryDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Container Registry vs Amazon ECRDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Container Registry vs HarborDec 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)3.91.6%92%98 interviewsAdd to research
JFrog Container Registry3.828.4%83%6 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Azure Container Registry is valued for its portability, elasticity, and security. It offers easy management of Windows and Linux containers, zone replication, and encryption. Users appreciate its scalability, authentication, role-based access, and CLI interaction. It supports secure image deployment, task automation, and vulnerability detection. Its integration with Azure services aids in easy application deployment and geo-replication. Fast, reliable, with minimal downtime, it efficiently manages container images and offers robust access controls.
  • "The geo-replication features of Azure Container Registry are powerful, facilitating alias connectivity and architecture implementation with private endpoints, while the integration with Azure Kubernetes services ensures reliable deployments."
  • "Azure Container Registry can be used to detect vulnerabilities in your image."
  • "The whole package is valuable as it allows for easy application cloning and deployment."

Room for Improvement

Azure Container Registry faces issues with VPN image pulling, limited graphical interface, and deployment delays. Users experience intermittent access problems and suggest improvements in accessibility, security, and support knowledge. They want better image management, such as auto-scanning for vulnerabilities and a unified Kubernetes service integration. Users mention the need for improved log visibility, graphical tools for image creation, and a more affordable Premium tier. Integration abilities and scalability also have room for enhancement.
  • "We have not explored geo-replication features."
  • "There is a need for a graphical interface instead of writing code in Visual Studio to create images."
  • "The building of images on the container is quite cumbersome."

ROI

Users experience a mix of benefits with Azure Container Registry. They observe operational efficiency and savings on repository bills. Some express uncertainty about its value compared to alternatives like JFrog Artifactory, noting similar functionalities. Others highlight ROI in learning and infrastructure management funded by clients. Horizontal scaling possibilities and high availability are considered significant advantages, although some find its necessity driven by internal constraints rather than unique advantages.

Pricing

Azure Container Registry pricing is flexible, offering Basic, Standard, and Premium plans. Users report costs around $1.5 to $1.66 daily for single-region deployments, with about $50 monthly for one geographic location. Pricing is storage-based and considered reasonable by many, though some find it on the expensive side compared to alternatives. The Premium plan includes enhancements with 500 GB of free storage. Contracts can range from annually to up to ten years for stability.
  • "I would rate the pricing four out of ten."
  • "The product is competitively priced."
  • "When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."

Popular Use Cases

Businesses utilize Azure Container Registry primarily for storing and managing Docker images. Organizations deploy containerized applications through DevOps pipelines, ensuring secure and efficient handling of artifacts. Companies in healthcare, logistics, and technology sectors find it effective for building, shipping, and managing containers, taking advantage of its cloud-based, secure, and scalable nature. It's integral in environments using microservices architecture, facilitating CI/CD processes, and supporting multi-regional deployment needs.

Service and Support

Microsoft provides varying levels of support for Azure Container Registry. Some users rate it highly, with prompt assistance and effective solutions. Others find the service lacking, particularly without a support plan, and note reliance on forums. Some report that support can sometimes feel outsourced and rely on documentation. Many have not needed to contact support due to the platform's ease of use. Pricing for integrated plans and user satisfaction differ significantly.

Deployment

Some users found Azure Container Registry's initial setup straightforward and quick, while others faced complexity, especially when dealing with infrastructure or migrations from other registries. The deployment time varied, with some experiencing delays due to replication and regional differences. Most agreed that understanding Docker and container concepts was beneficial, but settings like private access were easy to implement. Ratings for ease varied, with many rating the setup highly despite initial challenges for some.

Scalability

Azure Container Registry is recognized for its scalability across different tiers. Many users report that it easily supports multiple repositories and users without issues, including those deploying to AKS. Azure Container Registry enables fast deployment and resource scaling with user-friendly adjustments. While some rate its scalability lower, others find it exceptional, often scoring it highly. Upgrading is straightforward, though downgrading is less flexible, a common trait among cloud services.

Stability

Azure Container Registry is generally stable with integrated security features, resiliency, and replication. Ratings range from seven to ten for stability. Users experience minimal downtime, although some report crashes with indexing. Many find it efficient in its operations. Several note consistent performance even in older Azure versions, commending its robustness. Some express rare short downtimes, but overall functions remain reliable. Azure interface is user-friendly, and its stability scores well among most users.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Azure Container Registry Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business96
Midsize Enterprise61
Large Enterprise208
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Government
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Non Profit
3%
Construction Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
University
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Security Firm
1%
Sports Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Printing Company
1%

Compare Azure Container Registry with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Azure Container Registry

Azure Container Registry was previously known as Microsoft Azure Container Registry.

Azure Container Registry customers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra

Related questions

  • 7
When evaluating Container Registry, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 35
Why is Container Registry important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Container Registry

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry
JFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container Registry Logo
JFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container Registry
Harbor vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Harbor vs Azure Container Registry
Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry
Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry
See all alternatives
 
Azure Container Registry Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Project Manager at Capgemini4.5No summary available
Business Architecture Senior Analyst at Accenture4.5I've used Azure Container Registry with microservices in AKS for 2-3 years; it's easy to deploy, secure with image scanning, and integrates well with Azure DevOps, though we haven't explored geo-replication features yet.
Strategic Head | Azure Services and GRC at Braintree4.0We use Azure Container Registry for a financial client, integrating it with Service Fabric for local banking containers. Image building is cumbersome, but it enhances operational efficiency and horizontal scaling. As a Microsoft partner, we support numerous Azure-managed services.
DevOps Engineer at Hippo Video4.0I utilized Azure Container Registry for storing Docker images when shifting from a monolith to a microservices model. Its speed, security, and reliability impressed me, though improvements are needed in automatic image updates. Overall, it's an excellent solution.
Solution architect / DevOps tech leader / Backend RestAPI / Frontend React.js at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I used Azure Container Registry for its seamless integration with Azure App Service, appreciating its isolation feature and visibility into Docker images. However, it occasionally faced access issues, and I wished for image auto-scanning to identify vulnerabilities.
Technical Architect at LTIMindtree4.5I use Azure Container Registry to package and run applications anywhere, valuing its ability to own application images. While a graphical interface would improve ease of use, integrating Kubernetes could enhance operations. Azure integration makes it preferable to Docker Hub.
Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC4.0Azure Container Registry, being well-documented and native to Azure, was easy to integrate with my services. Despite its limitations with indexing Helm charts, it helped reduce our repository costs by 92%, making it a valuable choice over AWS and GCP.
Cloud and DevOps Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.5Our company uses Azure Container Registry to store Docker images for software development, leveraging Azure DevOps for deployments. It offers good accessibility and ease of use, though security measures could be enhanced. We primarily use it due to its native integration with Azure Cloud.