Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo

Symantec Endpoint Encryption Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.
Get the Symantec Endpoint Encryption Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Microsoft BitLocker, Digital Guardian and more!
Symantec Endpoint Encryption is the #4 ranked solution in top Endpoint Encryption solutions. PeerSpot users give Symantec Endpoint Encryption an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most commonly compared to Microsoft BitLocker: Symantec Endpoint Encryption vs Microsoft BitLocker. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 54% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
September 2025
Get the report
Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Featured Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

Read more reviews

Symantec Endpoint Encryption mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Encryption in the Endpoint Encryption category stands at 9.4%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Encryption Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Symantec Endpoint Encryption9.4%
Microsoft BitLocker34.6%
ESET Endpoint Encryption16.5%
Other39.5%
Endpoint Encryption

PeerResearch reports based on Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEndpoint EncryptionOct 3, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 3, 2025Download
ComparisonSymantec Endpoint Encryption vs Microsoft BitLockerOct 3, 2025Download
ComparisonSymantec Endpoint Encryption vs Sophos SafeGuardOct 3, 2025Download
ComparisonSymantec Endpoint Encryption vs ESET Endpoint EncryptionOct 3, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft BitLocker4.134.6%89%66 interviewsAdd to research
Digital Guardian3.71.6%77%11 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers robust encryption, easy management, and seamless integration with Symantec Messaging Gateway and DLP. Users appreciate the centralized management, effective ransomware and malware protection, and enterprise-wide scalability. The console allows for effortless data control, licensing integration, and key management. Easy deployment, customization, and strong detection capabilities enhance data protection. Encryption operates smoothly in the background, ensuring security without user disruption. It provides comprehensive features with minimal maintenance and clear reporting.
  • "Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a very good product, easy to use with remote management capabilities."
  • "The most effective features of Symantec are those related to data protection."
  • "The solution was used to find harmful files and viruses on laptops."

Room for Improvement

Symantec Endpoint Encryption needs improved integration with non-Symantec products and a more user-friendly interface. Support and technical assistance require enhancement. Users report difficulties with the encryption and decryption processes affecting efficiency. Visibility control for security policies should be refined, and the on-premises version needs simplification. Issues with Active Directory synchronization and remote deployment have been noted. The performance impact on devices and high price are concerns. More seamless updates and advanced features would benefit users.
  • "I would like to see some features or functionality enhanced in Symantec Endpoint Encryption."
  • "I would like to have less frequent updates."
  • "Upgrades from one version to another may only sometimes be straightforward, especially if one needs a clearer understanding of the process."

ROI

Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers a straightforward deployment that doesn't require extensive skills, easily integrating clients with its software. Users find it effective for data protection and increasing staff productivity, satisfying requirements at a high level. Although there isn't a direct financial gain, it enhances security and productivity, representing a significant return on investment.

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing varies, with some users finding it expensive but suitable for large enterprises aiming to scale. Yearly licensing costs are often reported as high, with some mentioning figures ranging from $5,000 to $12,000 due to changes. While some find it competitive and bundled with other products, others compare it unfavorably against less costly alternatives like BitLocker. Annual licensing is typical, though exchange rate fluctuations can impact affordability for global organizations.
  • "Considering the fluctuation in exchange rates in our part of the world, we find it generally affordable."
  • "We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range."
  • "Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Symantec Endpoint Encryption for endpoint security, encryption, and data protection across various industries, including financial sectors and government ministries. This encryption covers messaging, shared folders, hard drives, emails, and entire networks. It aids companies in compliance with regulatory requirements by securing data on cloud and on-premises setups. Its usage extends to protecting against data loss, patching information systems, and securing corporate data across devices, enhancing overall cybersecurity strategies.

Service and Support

Symantec Endpoint Encryption's customer service experiences vary. Some entities find technical support responsive and effective, while others report slow response times and challenges during transitions. In certain regions, language barriers can complicate communication. Many have never engaged support due to lack of issues, while a few have faced delays in ticket resolution. Overall, satisfaction ranges from high to significant disappointment, with ratings varying broadly, reflecting diverse experiences across different users and locations.

Deployment

Many found Symantec Endpoint Encryption's initial setup straightforward, while others experienced complexity. Complexity arose from deploying on-premises, integrating with existing systems, or creating profiles. Deployment times varied, influenced by hardware and customer configurations. Some users with experience found it intuitive, whereas others required external support or consultants for successful implementation. Symantec Endpoint Encryption's setup involved varying durations, from minutes to days, depending on scope and resources available.

Scalability

Symantec Endpoint Encryption is suitable for organizations of various sizes without significant issues related to scaling. Companies have seamlessly implemented it across thousands of endpoints, and several have successfully expanded usage in large multi-location setups. Effective integration with existing infrastructure has facilitated its scalability. Although some cited isolated compatibility challenges, users generally find it scalable, with many rating it highly for extending coverage efficiently across extensive user bases.

Stability

Symantec Endpoint Encryption is generally stable and reliable according to multiple experiences. Some note its excellent performance without crashes, bugs, or freezes. However, a few mentions of issues such as disk encryption delays and challenges with Microsoft updates exist. Occasional disconnection from management servers requires manual intervention. The endpoint's stability often rates between eight and ten out of ten, indicating a mostly positive reception with room for improvement in certain areas.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Symantec Endpoint Encryption Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business58
Midsize Enterprise29
Large Enterprise102
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Performing Arts
5%
Government
5%
University
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Non Profit
4%
Retailer
3%
Construction Company
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Program Development Consultancy
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Symantec Endpoint Encryption with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Symantec Endpoint Encryption was previously known as Symantec Drive Encryption.

Symantec Endpoint Encryption customers

Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency

Related questions

  • 7
What are the main pros and cons of the various Endpoint Encryption solutions on the market?
  • 68
How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
  • 4
Which encryption solution is better: ESET Endpoint Encryption or Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
  • 10
Which full disk encryption software should we chose?
  • 135
What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?
  • 34
What is the best email encryption software for small enterprises using Office 365?
  • 4
When evaluating Endpoint Encryption, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 63
What should one take into account when replacing PGP with Microsoft BitLocker?
  • 31
Why do organizations need endpoint encryption?
  • 7
What are the main pros and cons of the various Endpoint Encryption solutions on the market?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Endpoint Encryption

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Digital Guardian vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Digital Guardian vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Sophos SafeGuard vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Sophos SafeGuard vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
ZENworks Suite vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
ZENworks Suite vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption Logo
Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption
See all alternatives
 
Symantec Endpoint Encryption Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Security Risk Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I use Symantec Endpoint Encryption for securing endpoints and servers, finding it easy to manage with helpful remote capabilities and a straightforward dashboard. While support is occasionally an issue, it's rare and not a major concern.
Project Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.5I've used Symantec Endpoint Encryption for three years to secure our file servers, and it integrates well with Microsoft systems. It's stable, scalable, and easy to manage, though pricing could be more competitive.
Senior Network Associate at AMCON, Inc.4.0I use Symantec Endpoint Encryption to secure my organization's environment by providing antivirus protection and controlling application access. While it effectively restricts copying to removable drives, migrating to the cloud and upgrading versions could be more straightforward.
Network Security Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5We use Symantec Endpoint Encryption as the antivirus solution for client machines. It is easy to deploy, customizable, and offers robust detection, including zero-day protections. However, the GUI could be improved to make options easier to locate.
Security Technical Manager at Modaberan Fanavari Pasargad3.5I chose Symantec Endpoint Encryption for a client because of its strong encryption capabilities and integration with other Symantec products. However, it lacks traffic intelligence, has a poor UI, and is challenging to integrate with DLP, causing user difficulties.
Technical Support Engineer- Network Team at PRO TECHnology4.0I use Symantec Endpoint Encryption to secure corporate data on various devices. Its most valuable feature is data protection, although some enhancements are needed. We chose BitLocker for full disk encryption but continue to compare both solutions.
Head Cyber Digital and Security at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.0I find Symantec Endpoint Encryption to be a reasonable solution, though it could benefit from incorporating newer features available in the market. Overall, it is a decent option but lacks some advanced capabilities found in other solutions.
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0No summary available