OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. OpenText is ranked #11, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 2.5% mindshare in EE, compared to Broadcom’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Privacy and P...

Read 2 OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) reviews

889 Views
293 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Read 37 Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

1,271 Views
1,233 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Privacy and P...

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation compete in data protection. Symantec has an edge in customer support and ease of use, while OpenText offers robust features, justifying its cost with comprehensive protection.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption provides advanced encryption, centralized management across diverse devices, including full-disk encryption and removable media protection. OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation offers data-centric encryption, tokenization, and anonymization for enhanced data privacy. Its focus on data-level security makes it suitable for organizations with advanced privacy needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec is praised for its straightforward deployment and strong vendor support, appealing to organizations with varying IT capacities. OpenText's deployment can be more complex due to its comprehensive feature set, but it provides extensive support channels. The ease of Symantec's deployment is advantageous for a quick setup, while OpenText offers detailed guidance for complex data protection setups.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Encryption is more cost-effective, with competitive pricing that aligns with its straightforward deployment and robust features. Its ROI benefits from lower initial setup costs. OpenText is priced higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities. The strong ROI appeals to businesses prioritizing data-centric security, with comprehensive protection justifying the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,299 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Privacy and P...

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Masking (5th)

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) is 2.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is 9.4%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Encryption Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Symantec Endpoint Encryption	9.4%
OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)	2.5%
Other	88.1%

Endpoint Encryption

Featured Reviews

Prischal Bahgoo

General Manager at VIC IT

Effortless install, features rich, and scalable

The solution has helped with PCI compliance, masking, and encrypting PII information within our environment. What we found is that when we secured the information through encryption, we then were not scared of who was actually viewing the data. We wanted to know If we could still function as per normal, with this encrypted or masked data. The reason for this was we now know that it is real data that are encrypted, and because of the format, preserving encryption was easier to get it done. We did not have many different types of extra security features. Additionally, what we found was that from securing the perimeter of our environment with Micro Focus' voltage secure data, it does field-level encryption, which secured it one step even further. If we were breached from the perimeter, the data was actually still encrypted, which gave us an extra layer of security.

Read full review

Bharath Kumar Gajula

Network Security Architect at Capgemini

Robust data protection with user-friendly deployment, competitive pricing, and comprehensive features like customizable alerts and effective detection capabilities but needs GUI improvements

The stability is relatively good. Occasionally, certain clients may experience disconnection from the management servers, requiring a manual process to rectify. Even in instances where the link is severed, restoring client connectivity can be challenging, sometimes necessitating the uninstallation and reinstallation of the software. Additionally, when clients go out of sync, we do not receive alerts, indicating an area for potential improvement. I would rate it seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise is the ease of configuration and the group services rest API."

"The number one feature I found was that the install was really easy, it was quite helpful."

"We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities."

"It is fairly stable."

"The solution was used to find harmful files and viruses on laptops."

"The installation process is pretty straightforward."

"It helps us put antivirus solutions in place and prevent malware from getting to our machines."

"The best feature of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is the encryption itself. Encryption truly is the way to go because nowadays we are living in an era of widespread server threats, and you need to encrypt your emails and documents because you never know who might get hold of them."

"It is stable."

"Its management is good, and it is also scalable and mostly stable."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pros

Cons

"Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise can improve the types of encryptions. They are limited by the number of types of encryption and types of masking they are allowing. In the solution that we were using, the illustration interface and the number of capabilities in terms of data masking were limited."

"For a future release, the interface looks a bit dated and could be improved."

"I would like to see some features or functionality enhanced in Symantec Endpoint Encryption."

"Its decryption time needs to be improved. Currently, its decryption time is very long, and it takes double time than encryption. They need to work on that. Its encryption time is fine."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption can improve by being more secure."

"I do not find the environment to be very user-friendly."

"What I didn't find helpful in the version we used is the fact that all devices had to be on the same network for us to push through the encryption."

"Upgrades from one version to another may only sometimes be straightforward, especially if one needs a clearer understanding of the process."

"If for example, a user forgets the endpoint key, they cannot access their data. We need a support team that is a single point of contact for the IT entity to be trained and to have documentation for troubleshooting and managing the solution."

"It was hard to install and took us about three months."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I found some of their licensing is a bit complex. I am also finding that some of their cloud solutions are quite expensive."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."

"The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."

"The license is not very expensive."

"The solution is good, but it is more expensive than other solutions in the market. Other solutions, such as BitLocker are less expensive."

"Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."

"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."

"They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protecti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not sure about the pricing and licensing cost of Symantec Endpoint Encryption.

See all answers

Comparisons

Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Advanced Security vs OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)

Compared 16% of the time

Vormetric Application Crypto Suite vs OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)

Compared 13% of the time

Fortanix Data Security Manager vs OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)

Compared 13% of the time

More OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 68% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 16% of the time

Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 7% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

August 2025

OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) report

Download OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

August 2025

Download Symantec Endpoint Encryption product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise, Micro Focus SecureData, Voltage, SecureData, Voltage SecureData

Symantec Drive Encryption

Overview

OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) offers advanced tools to secure sensitive data, catering to organizations focused on data integrity and privacy.

This comprehensive platform provides data-centric security by integrating encryption and tokenization methodologies. Addressing data privacy and protection needs with sophisticated features, it helps maintain compliance with rigorous industry standards. By supporting a modular approach, Voltage can be tailored to specific industry use cases, ensuring seamless alignment with client requirements.

What are the standout features of OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)?

Data Encryption: Protects data at rest, in motion, and in use.
Tokenization: Minimizes data exposure risk by replacing sensitive data with unique identifiers.
Access Controls: Offers robust identity management for secured access.
Compliance Monitoring: Ensures alignment with industry regulations.

Why should users consider OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)?

Enhanced Security: Provides layers of protection to secure confidential data.
Ease of Integration: Offers seamless compatibility with existing IT systems.
Operational Efficiency: Improves processes through automated security measures.
Regulatory Compliance: Simplifies adherence to data protection laws.

Industries such as financial services and healthcare implement OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) to protect sensitive customer information. This is achieved by seamlessly integrating encryption and tokenization into their existing frameworks, enhancing data security, and ensuring compliance with sector standards. By focusing on critical data assets, organizations can effectively reduce risk and enhance incident response strategies.

OpenText

Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Epicor, Allegiant Travel Company, EnvisionRxOptions

Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.