What stands out about my main use case and how my partners use Sweet Security is the deep runtime visibility and application layer security, particularly for APIs and microservices. This is where most traditional CNAPP solutions are weakest, and this is where Sweet Security performs exceptionally well. Additionally, in production environments, Sweet Security is focused on detecting and responding to real-life effects in live production environments. It correlates signals across cloud, apps, identity, and data into a single attack story. The way it contextualizes information in story form is another real positive, which I found mentioned by other reviewers as well. Before Sweet Security, partners and customers needed to conduct extensive investigations when they found detection of activity across all different platforms and security logs until they could identify what was actually wrong in the bigger picture. Sweet Security enabled teams to see each detection of activity upon every request made from the application level towards the infrastructure, making it much easier and reducing the time for an analyst to understand what is really happening. It provides real-time visibility in the cloud environment, which is a massive differentiator because teams are seeing events as they happen, live in real time. Sweet Security's capabilities in runtime coverage impact my overall security strategy and the strategies of my partners by allowing us to capture threats as they occur in the live production environment in real time. We are capturing code-level events because we have shifted right in our approach. This is a key point to add: we are not traditional tools on the left side of the shift. We shift right, which means we operate in production and in real time. We are not pre-code or pre-cloud. We have shifted right, and this is a massive positive for time efficiency, workload efficiency, and more importantly, being proactive rather than reactive across the cyber landscape.
