StarWind Virtual SAN Reviews

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is that we use it in a virtual environment with VMware and in another aspect with Red Hat virtualization.

A specific example of how I'm using StarWind Virtual SAN in my VMware or Red Hat environments is that we work in a special scenario to implement a virtual SAN in legacy servers to improve the capacity of the systems in the data center.

The reason I chose StarWind Virtual SAN for this particular scenario is really the features, the ease of use, and most importantly, the price.

In my opinion, the best features StarWind Virtual SAN offers are easy integration with the system installed in the data center. The integration with my existing systems in the data center works well, especially with VMware, as we already have a big cluster in VMware, and the easy integration with that is helpful to solve some problems with the platform.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted my organization by reducing OPEX costs.

My OPEX costs have gone down as we reutilize some old servers, and this reduces the CAPEX of hardware in the data center.

I do not have anything to add about needed improvements, even small things that could make my experience better.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for four years.

In my experience, StarWind Virtual SAN is totally stable.

I do not have information about StarWind Virtual SAN's scalability in my environment because I only work as a designer and in the operation, I do not see anything.

I have to add that the support team of StarWind really knows the product and is helpful to implement the solution.

The customer support from StarWind Virtual SAN is great, as the people are knowledgeable and have great knowledge about the product and the functionality we require in the system.

Positive

I previously used VMware vSAN before StarWind Virtual SAN.

I decided to switch from VMware to StarWind Virtual SAN primarily because the first and most important thing is the cost, as VMware vSAN is too expensive and StarWind reduces the cost in maintenance and implementation.

Before choosing StarWind Virtual SAN, I did evaluate other options, specifically Red Hat Ceph and Nutanix NOS.

StarWind Virtual SAN is working fine without any problem, and I started using it three years ago.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate StarWind Virtual SAN as a nine.

I chose 9 out of 10 because it is easy to use, easy to implement, and the costs are reduced, which kept it from being a perfect 10.

Private Cloud

Other

Our main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is hyper-convergence of a two-node cluster.

We have multiple servers up and running at all times for our operations, and we were able to use StarWind Virtual SAN to create a two-node cluster without the need of any additional SAN equipment. We were able to accomplish this two-node cluster with highly available storage so that our virtual machines are able to failover and fall back without the need of any SAN.

StarWind Virtual SAN is deployed in our organization on-premises, as we have it installed locally on our Hyper-V host. Those two are bound together by that shared storage and that's where our virtual machines live so that they can travel back and forth between the two hosts without issue.

The single best feature that StarWind Virtual SAN offers is their professional support package. When any part of this cluster breaks or falls over, they're alerting me within twenty minutes that it's down and asking if we need support getting it back up. They're great at their twenty-four hour support and they've been well worth every penny.

My experience with their support team has been outstanding. For instance, the first time that we were patching one of the nodes, when it came back online, StarWind Virtual SAN didn't start up correctly. Within minutes, support had reached out and identified the issue, asking if I needed support getting it back up. At the time I did, so I asked for assistance and we had the situation completely resolved in under twenty minutes.

StarWind Virtual SAN has impacted my organization positively with a one hundred percent improvement in uptime. Our virtual machines that are running in that highly available storage don't need to go down anymore. If we need to do any patching on one of our hosts, we just have to live migrate the machines from one host to the other, patch the host and then move them back and patch the other. It's really helped with keeping that uptime solid. As far as cost reductions, we don't have to worry about a virtual SAN or a regular SAN. That can get really expensive over time, and that's just another thing that you have in your infrastructure that might fall apart, break, or any other cost sink that might be related with it. You don't have to worry about that anymore with StarWind Virtual SAN. You just have the software and you've got a support team ready to go to war to get that thing back alive for you.

The only thing that I would say about documentation is there are some aspects of the documentation that are a little bit unclear. However, when I worked through those issues with their professional support, they were able to explain everything very well. If anything, I would say that maybe their documentation needs to be looked at and made a little bit easier to understand and access.

StarWind Virtual SAN itself does everything that it needs to do right out of the box. Their support was instrumental in getting it set up in our environment. I really don't think there's anything that they need to do to be improved. They just need to continue doing what they're doing and fulfilling the promises that they make, which they do.

We've been using StarWind Virtual SAN for less than a year, and it has completely changed how we stand up our new facilities.

StarWind Virtual SAN is stable in my environment.

The scalability is probably not that great; with StarWind Virtual SAN you can either have a two-node cluster or a three-node cluster. I don't believe you can go farther than a three-node cluster. However, when you move from a two-node cluster to a three-node cluster, you have to completely redo the way that they are connected to each other with iSCSI. They have to communicate with each other in a specific way and if you take it from a two-node to a three-node, there's a lot of work that you have to do with that.

I have not needed to scale up or down. Since we have a two-node cluster, we can only go up to a three-node cluster. The amount of work that it would take to make it a three-node cluster made it not appealing. We would have to get another node, we would have to change the networking between them, and we would have to change things on the switch. It wasn't worth it. We've just kept it at the two-node cluster.

Customer support is great, and I have not had any issues getting timely help from StarWind Virtual SAN.

Negative

We didn't have a previous virtual SAN solution; we had our other facilities set up in a completely different way. Moving forward, we're going to be modernizing these facilities by using StarWind Virtual SAN software to create that hyper-converged environment so that we can get this set up the same way there. This was a first time for us.

The return on investment is really not having a need for an on-premises physical SAN. We don't have to worry about keeping that patched, we don't have to worry about parts on it breaking and having to replace, and we don't have to worry about drives going down. Now we have this highly available storage, and that's really the return.

The only metric that I noticed was money saved after the deployment; the cost of StarWind Virtual SAN compared to an actual SAN was minimal. Since we don't need the SAN, we have savings there, and storage can become very expensive very quickly.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very good. We were able to get the software at a good cost. I did most of the setup, so there wasn't really any cost there. The professional services were included in our pricing, and what that did was allow them to come in and assist me with that setup. There was not an individual setup cost. Licensing seemed fair, and I have no complaints there. Overall the experience was good.

We were evaluating the purchase of an actual SAN, but it started getting too costly and we didn't have enough room on our rack for it in our server room. There were plenty of complications that came up that made a virtual SAN and software very appealing. StarWind Virtual SAN was really the first one that we checked with, and once we started trialing and using the software and realizing it did everything we needed it to, it was a slam dunk. There was nothing as cost-efficient as it and fortunately it does everything we needed to do.

We evaluated other infrastructure solutions, not specifically a virtual SAN. StarWind Virtual SAN was the first virtual SAN that we went with, and as it did everything that we needed it to, there was no question we were going to purchase this software.

It's worked so well that we are going to be rolling it out to our other locations this upcoming year in two thousand twenty-six.

It's one of the few times that a company has come out and said that they were going to do something in particular and actually came through and did it. They assured us that we'd be able to get this two-node cluster up and running and that our vision of how we would like the infrastructure to look made sense. When they helped us get everything set up, we've really had no problems since then. I would have to give them a perfect score because they fulfill the promises they say that they're going to make. The cost of the software is very affordable and it does the job exactly as it's supposed to.

I would tell others looking into using StarWind Virtual SAN to make sure that they get the professional support package, because you don't have to worry at that point. The software is going to do what it's supposed to do, and if there's any problems with it, they let you know. They're fast about response and they're very concise. You understand the problem and they work with you to get it taken care of. My advice is to get the support package.

The only additional thought I have about StarWind Virtual SAN is that it's rare these days to get a company that makes a promise and fulfills it. I can't say enough good things about the team; they're great. I give this review a perfect rating of ten out of ten.

On-premises

Other

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is for high availability because we have infrastructure that we want to maintain high availability and reliability is key to this.

Regarding my main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN, I can say that we have multiple hosts, and if one host dies, the other one picks up. We don't want to have multiple individual servers, and this seemed to work very well for us. StarWind Virtual SAN is very flexible, and I can run it with all kinds of hardware; it doesn't have to be the same hardware. I can run it on different kinds of hardware, which is very important for us because that means we didn't have to spend money buying new hardware and trying to get matching hardware. This was useful for us.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted my organization by providing high availability. Before we used to have issues with Microsoft S2D, and we had a number of issues there with some downtimes here and there. Troubleshooting Microsoft S2D is not the easiest. But with StarWind Virtual SAN, we've maintained high availability, and we're talking about probably up to 98, 99% availability in the year. Most of the issues we have are actually nothing to do with the system itself; they're more related to our environment. Sometimes we have power losses or other environmental factors which may have caused some of the downtime.

This high availability from StarWind Virtual SAN has impacted my team and business operations positively. Productivity is definitely high, and satisfaction is higher because we don't have downtimes. We keep the business going, and as far as IT is concerned, we focus on other areas of IT to improve the business rather than running around trying to get the system running. The system is basically running itself 24/7, 365 days a year, and there's not much to do. We end up focusing on other more productive areas to improve the business.

The best features StarWind Virtual SAN offers are hardware flexibility, ease of use, and superb support.

The flexibility of StarWind Virtual SAN means I don't have to buy similar hardware. I could be using older hardware and it would still work. All I had to do is make sure that I have enough disk and fast storage. This prevented us from having to buy new hardware. The ease of use is evident because the interface is very easy. I can do whatever very easily, and there are no complications. Regarding support, we have very good support with them through the premium support tier. They monitor our system and let us know if something is not working well. They tell us proactively, and that way we've managed to maintain high availability of the infrastructure. They're very good and easy to work with.

I know that there is an aspect that can be improved in StarWind Virtual SAN, probably something to do with the storage. For instance, when there is a downtime, when a host goes down, it needs to sync the storage with the other live host, and it takes a bit of time. It doesn't stop productivity; it takes a bit of time. I think that might depend on the kinds of storage that you have and how fast they are, and also the links between the hosts. Maybe that's an area that they can look at to see if they can improve that, but I'm not sure if they have much control over that.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for probably at least five years.

StarWind Virtual SAN is stable.

StarWind Virtual SAN's scalability is good. We have not needed to scale, but as far as I know, it can scale by adding more hosts to it. We are okay with the number of hosts that we have right now. We haven't found a need to scale out, but it has capabilities to scale out.

I think the customer support for StarWind Virtual SAN is probably the best that we can possibly say. Compared to what we had before, trying to get Microsoft online to help us with S2D issues, you can't compare it. We have proactive support, which costs a bit extra money, but I think it's worth it. The system is continuously monitored, and any glitches or concerns are communicated to us before we even become aware of them. They let us know, and we coordinate with them if there is any need to involve them in fixing anything. They are involved and help us fix it, so it's been very good.

I previously used Microsoft S2D, and we switched because we had a lot of issues with it. Troubleshooting Microsoft S2D was quite difficult due to major issues, such as network drivers and storage drivers. We decided to switch back to StarWind Virtual SAN.

I haven't specifically taken any metrics regarding return on investment, but ballparking it, I think the time saved when we had the previous system compared to now is significant. I think we spend less time troubleshooting and dealing with system downtime. It seems to be more stable. Obviously, in terms of availability and the impact on the business itself and the loss of productivity that we've had with previous systems, StarWind Virtual SAN has definitely shown to be a good investment.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for StarWind Virtual SAN is good. The licensing is reasonable and within our budget.

Before choosing StarWind Virtual SAN, I evaluated other options, including HP versions of HCIs and Nutanix, along with Everon. However, they were beyond our budget, so we decided to go with StarWind Virtual SAN, which did what we wanted and was within our budget.

My advice for others looking into using StarWind Virtual SAN is to make sure they have their requirements all in place before they start looking for anything around vSAN or HCIs. They should see if they can have a demo with the vendor. We had a demo with the vendor, went through their process, and had questions and answer sessions. Scalability wasn't a consideration for us since we just wanted to replicate what we had, but in some environments, it might be necessary to consider scalability. It's essential to have stable power; otherwise, issues with host sync can arise and can take some time. I would rate this review as a nine out of ten.

On-premises

Other

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is secure, reliable, virtualized storage. Given the amount of remediation I deal with regarding encrypted systems through ransomware, StarWind Virtual SAN has never been ransomed or encrypted. My systems have survived two attacks where there have been attempted breaches and encryption of my business. Because of the way StarWind Virtual SAN works, my data survived.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted my organization as we are not having to worry about licensing costs; it is paid for, and we have the license perpetually. We pay for support as we require it. Because of my background in IT, I do not need my hands held with support. I can deal with most issues, but if I do have an issue or there is a bug, I can drop an email to StarWind support and they get back to me very quickly.

In the past when I have dealt with their other products, I drop them an email and most problems are solved within half an hour. When we have had mission-critical outages in the past, it takes normally 10 to 15 minutes and it is rectified. Compared with dealing with Broadcom, the last time we had to deal with a vSAN issue with mission-critical support, it took two and a half hours just to get through the raft and array of nonsensical systems before we could even talk to a human being.

The best features StarWind Virtual SAN offers are that it is a cost-effective, simple, reliable product that rivals ESXi and Broadcom vSAN. It just works without the horrific pricing structure that Broadcom has now brought in that is pushing people away from the VMware software. I have been using VMware software since 2006 and I have been dealing with StarWind software since 2007 when I worked out in Africa for the Botswana government. The products just work without the horrific vendor lock-in prices that you get with Broadcom.

StarWind Virtual SAN helped my data survive those attacks because part of the architecture was that the ransomware was not able to breach the SAN; it was unable to access it and encrypt the data compared with normal SAN arrays that breach through Active Directory regardless of anything else and encrypt. Because StarWind Virtual SAN did not become part of my Active Directory, it was unable to make that jump and encrypt my network.

The integration of StarWind Virtual SAN is excellent; it just integrates with everything we have used. Nutanix, ESXi, and Proxmox all work with it. It just functions.

The quick support and simplified licensing of StarWind Virtual SAN has translated into measurable benefits in terms of money saved, time saved, and fewer resources needed. Simplified licensing means measurable benefits through money saved, time saved, and fewer resources needed. It just works without any problem whatsoever.

StarWind Virtual SAN could be improved with a slight change to the interface and bringing it up to date slightly to make it align more with what people are used to. It deploys easily enough; nothing really could be improved with it as far as the actual product goes, but the interface seems a little dated.

I do not have anything else to add about needed improvements because it all works fantastically.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for about two years now, and I switched from VMware vSAN because of the amount of problems with it and the costs.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very stable.

I do not have specific knowledge about how scalable StarWind Virtual SAN is as we do not need to scale it. It runs 56 terabytes of data across two or three LUNs, so it must be scalable, though I just have no need to scale it any further than 56 terabytes.

The customer support of StarWind Virtual SAN is excellent; it always has been. If I drop them a message or give them a ring, in 10 minutes, the problem is resolved. I have had this level of service since 2007.

I did previously use a different solution; it was ESXi vSAN. I switched because Broadcom's pricing went from sensible to astronomical after Broadcom purchased it. They crucified the small business and do not care.

I have seen a return on investment with StarWind Virtual SAN. I saved money, time, and needed fewer employees.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been fantastic. We called them up, got a demo, and downloaded it.

Before choosing StarWind Virtual SAN, I did not evaluate other options this time because I already had dealt with them in the past. I had previous software for iSCSI targets for clients years ago. I did a couple of Google searches for equivalent SANs. The name came up, I got a demo, deployed it, appreciated it, and purchased it.

My advice to others looking into using StarWind Virtual SAN is to purchase it because it works. StarWind Virtual SAN works fantastically. I give StarWind Virtual SAN a review rating of 10.

On-premises

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is for clustering in our store, specifically using Windows OS and Hyper-V for the virtual machine. In our store, we have services for our customers, and I use StarWind Virtual SAN with Windows OS and Hyper-V to support these operations.

The best feature that StarWind Virtual SAN offers is clustering without buying the SAN.

That feature helps my organization day-to-day by saving costs and maintaining and improving business continuity.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted my organization because we have improved business continuity. It improved business continuity by requiring very little time; for example, when one of our servers went offline for any reason, the VM automatically switched to the nodes that are up.

StarWind Virtual SAN can be improved by adding a certificate with the virtual switch in Hyper-V, reducing the license cost, and not having a minimum of 3 TB requirement.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for a year.

StarWind Virtual SAN is stable.

The scalability of StarWind Virtual SAN is good for large numbers in storage, such as 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10 TB; however, under three TB, we are limited.

The customer support is very good.

I did not previously use a different solution like StarWind; I only used the standard features on Microsoft.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is acceptable for now, but I hope in the future we can find a better offer.

I have seen a return on investment because if I had to buy a SAN for $300, and multiply that by 200, I would have to spend $60,000, but with StarWind Virtual SAN, I only have to pay the license and not the hardware.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is acceptable for now, but I hope in the future we can find a better offer.

Before choosing StarWind Virtual SAN, I did not evaluate other options.

Regarding StarWind Virtual SAN's AI capabilities, I think of its governance and security as currently not being applicable.

Regarding StarWind Virtual SAN's AI capabilities, I think of its accuracy and reliability of output as something I did not use.

I rate StarWind Virtual SAN an eight out of ten. I chose eight out of ten because of the certificate and the licensing that I mentioned before.

My advice to others looking into using StarWind Virtual SAN is that if you need to do clustering and you do not want to buy a SAN, this is the right product.

On-premises

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is to be able to utilize directly attached storage as a SAN.

A specific example of how I use StarWind Virtual SAN for directly attached storage is that we use physical servers that have direct attached storage and wanted to start using a hypervisor. We picked Microsoft Hyper-V, and StarWind Virtual SAN allowed us to use those physical servers and still be able to set up storage area networking for Hyper-V.

It allowed us to not have to purchase a dedicated SAN, saving us a lot of money and still allowing us to utilize all the features and functions of Hyper-V.

In my experience, the best features StarWind Virtual SAN offers are ease of setup and configuration and ease of monitoring and maintenance.

The setup and configuration are easy because everything is laid out well. I can see my hardware devices, my virtual SAN, and the current status of the SAN across both physical servers from one pane of glass.

I would also add that the product has great reliability and is backed by a very responsive support team.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted my organization by helping us to virtualize servers so that we could improve business application delivery to our user base. Virtualizing servers improved application delivery because we were able to spin up virtual servers and then install and configure applications as needed for the project or requirement instead of having to purchase physical servers for each application.

I think that StarWind Virtual SAN can be improved in terms of scalability. Currently, we have a two-node cluster, and the maximum that is available is a three-node cluster. Being able to scale beyond a three-node cluster would be a great advantage.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for two years.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very stable.

In terms of scalability, StarWind Virtual SAN supports up to a three-node cluster, and after that, it does not scale any further.

Customer support is excellent and very responsive.

Prior to using StarWind Virtual SAN, I did not use a different solution.

I have seen a return on investment with lots of time saved by using Hyper-V, as we were able to cut down the amount of time it would take to deploy a business application. It was 75% faster to use virtual servers over the previous ordering of physical servers and having to configure those individually for each application.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing was straightforward. The setup costs were invoiced to us, we paid that, and then we were able to schedule a time to work with an engineer to get this set up and configured.

Before choosing StarWind Virtual SAN, I evaluated Nutanix and Pure Storage.

My advice to others looking into using StarWind Virtual SAN is to fully test the product in a test environment, but I think you will be impressed with the results. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

On-premises

My main use case is high availability. We have two server hosts that need to be in a cluster so that we can prevent downtime when one hardware is down or one server has issues. We use it for high availability and to smoothly disperse the performance.

The best feature for us is the ease of use of StarWind Virtual SAN. We can manage it easily and add disks or partitions with minimal effort. The graphical portal makes it very easy to use for management purposes.

What we appreciate with the graphical portal is that we can find everything easily. Compared to other solutions that sometimes require CLI use or have difficult navigation, StarWind Virtual SAN has everything very well organized and is very responsive. It is easy for us to find where we can configure the network, storage, and all other settings. Even if you are new to StarWind Virtual SAN, it is easy to use and manage.

We can also take advantage of the replication and synchronization facilities for disks. It is very easy to use with no major issues. The synchronization is stable and provides great value-add for us.

In our environment here in Madagascar, we experience a lot of power outages and the electricity is not stable. StarWind Virtual SAN has helped us tremendously because we sometimes have unexpected reboots of a host. With StarWind Virtual SAN, we often cannot even notice that one host has restarted because the services continue running during host restarts or other server issues. StarWind Virtual SAN helps us significantly in this regard.

StarWind Virtual SAN has helped us save considerable costs as we do not need a very large storage device such as a SAN as we had to purchase before. Now with StarWind Virtual SAN, we only need our two servers and everything functions properly. All we need to do is add some disks, which is very good for us because we are saving a lot of costs with that approach.

The thing that can be better is that we have experienced some issues with VMware hosts. When the lockdown mode is enabled on the server host, sometimes when the server reboots, it takes some time to resynchronize. They can try to improve how it works with lockdown mode in VMware ESXi.

This is the main thing on my mind because everything else is good for us.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for two years.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very stable. We have no problems with it.

The StarWind Virtual SAN scalability is very good. If we want to expand our storage or add disks, it is easy to add them, configure the RAID, and then deploy it. We very much appreciate that capability as well.

I have contacted them sometimes, and I can say they are very quick to respond. As soon as we contact them, around thirty minutes to one hour later, we receive a response. If the issue is serious, they can schedule a call directly to help us with troubleshooting. They are really good.

Positive

My advice to others is that if they want a stable and performant solution for high availability or in a hyper-converged infrastructure, StarWind Virtual SAN is the best choice.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very resilient and performant for sensitive business operations. I have covered everything regarding StarWind Virtual SAN in this review. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

On-premises

Other

We are operating in a remote area in Madagascar where networking and communication services are very limited, so we need a common storage solution for our two on-premises servers, which mirror each other. StarWind Virtual SAN provides us with a smart and cost-effective way to manage our storage between these servers.

StarWind Virtual SAN allows us to have all four servers connected to a common storage solution, virtualizing this particular storage solution so we don't spend money on a hardware solution that is significantly more expensive and more difficult to secure and properly manage.

It maintains all our storage for all our servers in sync at any given point in time, preventing issues with identity management or file and printer management.

I'm not certain how StarWind Virtual SAN can be improved. Perhaps they could have better technical support available for troubleshooting on our own, with better guidance and instructions. However, once they deployed the solution, everything was very good.

We have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for the past three years because of our on-premises setup.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very stable.

StarWind Virtual SAN is pretty scalable. It has certain hardware and software requirements, and while it may not be the right solution for a large organization, it is good for our situation as a mid-tier company.

The customer support is very good. We get a reply within two to four hours, and most of the time our issues are solved by the end of the day.

We did not previously use a different solution.

Setting up StarWind Virtual SAN wasn't easy, but I have to admit that we didn't have any sort of expertise in StarWind, which is why we've appreciated their technical support in setting up and configuring this solution. Once we concluded the contract, StarWind handled the entire deployment, installation, and configuration, and we had absolutely no issues with our equipment afterward.

StarWind handled the entire deployment, installation, and configuration.

A hardware solution would have cost around twelve thousand to fifteen thousand US dollars a year, while StarWind achieves the exact same outcome with just two thousand dollars a year. Once the solution has been deployed, we have had no issues, with everything always in sync, leading to an estimated ninety-nine percent reliability afterward.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very cost-effective for mid-level companies like ours, costing about one-sixth of what we would pay for a hardware solution that would require redundant hardware due to our remoteness. Once the virtual SAN is set up, it provides a very robust and redundant storage infrastructure solution with ninety-nine point five percent reliability.

We evaluated VMware and Microsoft Server 2022, but both solutions were more expensive and required additional hardware capabilities that we simply did not have.

StarWind Virtual SAN is a very robust solution, a bit tricky to deploy, but that's where StarWind helped us deploy it. The bottom line is that it is a very robust and cost-effective solution for our needs. I gave a rating of ten because it is a very robust solution and a very cost-effective solution.

We have considered governance and security in our deployment of StarWind Virtual SAN and didn't find any issues with the solution as a whole.

I recommend that others test StarWind Virtual SAN, and if it meets their needs, then they should deploy it. Perhaps you could provide some sort of a slide indicator or an idea of where we are in this entire interview so we would know how long this entire process would take.

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is to host data stores for our virtual machines, which we host across three nodes, giving us high availability and failover.

The setup has worked out for me in terms of reliability and performance as it's made a difference because on two occasions we've had disk failures that impacted an entire RAID array on one node. If that were on a single host, we would have lost data, so the high availability came in handy then.

The best features that StarWind Virtual SAN offers include the fact that you can utilize your own hardware, which allows us to repurpose a lot of surplus equipment we had instead of seeing it go into recycling, which was a really good plus point. Other good points are the low entry price; even though we've used our own hardware, the software was cheap and it's just the support that's costing us on a continuous basis, but that's really good. If you didn't want to take out the support, the free community would also be an option.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted our organization with massive cost savings. We moved from a different vendor who changed their licensing model, and if I compare StarWind's price versus the previous vendor's, there's been a massive saving. We wouldn't have been able to afford the old vendor on the current budget. So switching to StarWind allows us to maintain budget and also maintain the service levels that our internal customers were accustomed to. It's also allowed us to increase the feature set; we've been able to utilize more storage space with the offset savings.

I think StarWind Virtual SAN could be improved in that I really wish I could use it straight onto tin without any hypervisor or host operating system. I'd also like to mention that the acoustic noise from the Supermicro hardware, which we did purchase via StarWind, was a bit noisy and we had to relocate it into an acoustic rack because when those fans start spinning up, it was really noisy. Lastly, I think the severity two response time incidents could be improved upon; it's eight hours, and if that could be better, I'd like that.

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for three years.

StarWind Virtual SAN is very stable.

StarWind Virtual SAN's scalability has been sufficient for the high availability we need; we went across three nodes initially and haven't needed to scale up or out yet. I've seen the documents and know how it works in practice, and we're keeping an eye on usage, but we don't envisage having to scale out anytime soon.

Customer support is one of the really plus points for us; they've got a free community environment where you can get really quick answers from fellow users of the product. Additionally, we're also a paid customer for their increased support for severity one and severity two incidents. On the occasions when they have been needed to be engaged, they've been really knowledgeable on the product and remote in on several occasions to resolve issues very quickly while giving us tips and tricks to avoid it happening again.

I previously used VMware vSAN; we switched because VMware was bought by Broadcom and they changed the licensing model that made VMware vSAN not an attractive option for us.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that the setup cost initially was really cheap since we used our own hardware. We used it in-house to demo, so we did some use cases and some pilot deployments, which were free in the first three months of using it in a non-production environment. Once we moved it into production, we took out the support and that was the only cost.

After a year of running on our own hardware, that's when we purchased hardware via StarWind, and that's when it got expensive, but it was still a saving versus the previous vendor.

We saw that the cost was paid for within 18 months since moving to StarWind. Headcount was still the same; we kept the same number of people and sent them off to external training to get them all familiar with the StarWind product. There was a little bit of cost involved in that, but it was easy to offset with the savings.

We've saved 40% versus the previous vendor, and the storage space has increased 300% across the three nodes since moving to StarWind.

Before choosing StarWind Virtual SAN, I evaluated other options, including cloud storage for offsite backup and on-prem backup with HP products using Nimble storage and 3PAR storage. I also compared it to the previous vendor on VMware vSAN, but of course that wasn't an option on the new licensing model.

My advice for others looking into using StarWind Virtual SAN is to make sure you've got it on some good hardware. We made the mistake initially of using hardware that wasn't meeting the minimum requirements, and within a month or two, we spotted the issue of the network cards not providing enough throughput. So definitely make sure if you're using your own hardware, it's sufficiently specified and specked up. Alternatively, you could buy the hardware via StarWind, but as I mentioned about those Supermicro fans, I'd urge against that. If we did it again, we'd use StarWind Virtual SAN on HPE ProLiant hardware.

I would mention that my team is really passionate about the product because there's a free option; they've actually started using this product in their home lab environments, and I find that really fosters engagement. The team is eager to learn the product inside and outside of work, and you can really see the benefits of that from the workplace.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate StarWind Virtual SAN a 10.

On-premises

My main use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is to provide a high availability platform for hosting virtual machines.

A specific example of how we use StarWind Virtual SAN for hosting virtual machines is that we have customers who use remote desktop services, and we use StarWind as the underlying platform to host those remote desktop servers, which have got business applications, accounting products on them.

The best features that StarWind Virtual SAN offers in my experience are that it provides a very stable and reliable platform for hosting virtual machines, and it's also very cost-effective because you can utilize existing hardware.

StarWind Virtual SAN has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to repurpose existing hardware to provide a stable HA platform, and also with its proactive support.

An improvement for StarWind Virtual SAN would be to have an updated admin console.

StarWind Virtual SAN is stable.

StarWind Virtual SAN's scalability is comparable to any hyperconverged cluster scaling.

StarWind's proactive support has helped my organization by giving us the reassurance of 24/7 monitoring of the platform, so even outside of business hours, if something happens, StarWind engineers are able to troubleshoot the problem and look at things for us, which provides an extra level of reassurance.

I have noticed specific outcomes from having that 24/7 monitoring and proactive support, as we've had a much higher level of uptime, and we've also had help installing updates on our platform.

Customer support for StarWind Virtual SAN is fantastic.

Positive

I would recommend StarWind Virtual SAN to others looking into using it.

I have no additional thoughts about StarWind Virtual SAN before we wrap up.

Information not provided in the text.

Information not provided in the text.