Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs StarWind Virtual SAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructur...
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
2nd
Ranking in HCI
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
195
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) (3rd), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (3rd)
StarWind Virtual SAN
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
1st
Ranking in HCI
4th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
185
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category, the mindshare of Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is 3.0%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StarWind Virtual SAN is 9.2%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
Unique Categories:
HCI
8.4%
Software Defined Data Center (SDDC)
44.4%
 

Featured Reviews

SR
May 30, 2023
What you might not know about Nutanix that makes it so unique
Nutanix has the potential to replace most of today's traditional storage solutions. These are classic hybrid SAN arrays (dual and multi-controller), NAS Filers, newer All-Flash Arrays as well as any object, big data etc. use cases. For capacity, it usually comes down to the price for large amounts of data where Nutanix may offer higher-than-needed storage performance at a price point that isn't very attractive. This has been addressed in the first step using storage-only nodes which are essentially intelligent disk shelves (mainly SATA) with their own virtual SDS appliance preinstalled. Storage nodes are managed directly by the Nutanix cluster (the hypervisor isn't visible and no hypervisor license is necessary). While this is going in the right direction, larger storage nodes are needed to better support "cheap, big storage" use cases. For typical big data use cases today's combined compute and storage nodes (plus optionally storage-only nodes) are already a very good fit! The Nutanix File Services (Filer with active directory integration) are a very welcomed addition customers get with a simple software upgrade. Currently, this is available as a tech preview to all Acropolis Hypervisor (AHV) customers and will soon be released to ESXi as well. This is one example of a service running on top of the Nutanix distributed storage fabric, well integrated with the existing management layer (Prism) offering native scale-out capabilities and One-Click upgrade like everything else. The demand from customers for a built-in filer is big, they are looking to not depend on legacy filer technology any longer. We are looking forward to seeing this technology mature and offer more features over the coming months and years. Another customer need is to be able to consume Nutanix storage from outside the cluster for other, non-Nutanix workloads. These could include bare metal systems as well as non-supported hypervisors (e.g. Xen Server etc.). This functionality (called Volume Groups) is already implemented and available for use by local VMs (e.g. Windows Failover Cluster Quorum) and will soon be qualified for external access (already working from a technical point of view including MPIO multi-pathing with failover). It will be interesting to see if Nutanix will allow active-active access to such iSCSI LUNs (as opposed to the current active-passive implementation) with the upcoming release(s). Imagine if you upgraded your Nutanix cluster (again this would be a simple One-Click software upgrade) and all of sudden you have a multi-controller, active-active (high-end) storage array. (Please note that I am not a Nutanix employee and that these statements describing possible future functionality are to be understood as speculation from my side which might never become officially available.)
Stefano Tomasi - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 21, 2024
Easy to use while improving the efficiency and reliability of storage infrastructure
The solution could improve: Documentation and support: Improvements in documentation and support resources could enhance the user experience. Advanced configuration options: More advanced configuration options may be needed to cater to specific needs. Feature expansion: This could include: * Integration with containerization platforms for modern application development practices could be beneficial. * Enhanced monitoring and reporting capabilities to provide more insights into the performance and health of the storage environment. * Integration with cloud storage providers to enable hybrid cloud deployments and data tiering capabilities. * Support for automated data tiering to optimize storage utilization and performance based on usage patterns. * Advanced data protection features such as encryption at rest and in transit to ensure data security and compliance. * Integration with containerization platforms to support modern application development practices.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and the pricing is affordable."
"Best features are around data locality, compression, and deduplication."
"The management interface of this solution is great."
"One of the most valuable features is that it can be applied at any scale."
"The most valuable features are the user-friendly dashboard and that we don't need to move resources manually when adding new nodes into running clusters."
"The configuration is easy, and it's flexible."
"The administration console, automation, and the first cluster are all valuable features."
"Prism Central allows managing the cluster from a single pane of glass, and it allows a deeper dive into the solution."
"The backup is readily available for use, and the restoration process is easy."
"We have been able to use more on-prem hardware to reduce cost and also use old disks that we do not trust enough for ordinary RAID or usage."
"It has allowed us to save a lot of time and money by letting us create a vSAN within a Windows VM on the environment it controls."
"The license price is one of the cheapest in the market."
"The ability to choose our own hardware and our own vendors for this was hugely beneficial, as we had pre-existing relationships with vendors we wanted to maintain."
"VSAN works great; it's very easy to install, configure, and manage."
"The most valuable feature is the reliable storage replication, which enables me to create a robust infrastructure to run our business."
"It enables us to provide more solution options for our clients, with the reassurance that, when implemented, they will be efficient and stable."
 

Cons

"Our client had some old Citrix Xen servers for which there is no direct migration. Nutanix has a move utility for Microsoft Hyper-V clusters or VMware clusters. You can easily migrate them using the move utility, but the Xen clusters cannot be migrated in a simple way. That is the only thing that is lacking, but nowadays, no one uses the Citrix Xen server for their clusters. Everything else is already there. Nutanix keeps on upgrading its hardware's or hypervisor's capability to be able to support new technologies."
"One thing to keep in mind is that only experts can use it. It has to be in the proper hands, instead of going to XYZ people just for some cost savings. So lift-and-shift and migrations might be tricky, because it is not like a VMware."
"Nutanix needs to improve network features like Passthrough – SR-IOV. It could be improved by supporting SR-IOV, if they had that support, I would not have needed to implement the VMWare vSAN."
"Nutanix has a complex infrastructure, we have customers that consider VMware instead. Additionally, the performance could be better."
"The storage and back-up facilities could be improved. We need day-to-day encrypting of the database."
"Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure's LTS version needs to be more reliable."
"If we can have certified compatibility with other companies, such as Oracle, then it would let us know that they function correctly together."
"The ability to create clusters faster would be nice to see in a future release."
"Server-side snapshots are one thing the Linux appliance can't do yet."
"I would say that the documentation is mostly great, however, some features could be expanded upon a bit."
"While we had little to no issues in setting up StarWind and received excellent support from the StarWind technicians, we would have appreciated a clearer guideline for a setup with the free version of StarWind Management Console or, in other words - for the setup with the PowerShell."
"Updating the software can be a bit tricky."
"Regular updates to the software are required, and subtle design changes would be welcome."
"StarWind really needs to market its product more."
"StarWind Virtual SAN could benefit from better integration with other tools and technologies, such as backup and disaster recovery solutions."
"The setup and documentation for the installation with the free version could definitely be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Nutanix is lower than other products."
"The price of the solution could improve. Nutanix has recently changed its pricing model from perpetual to subscription. They have identified there are challenges with the pricing model."
"There are a lot of features included with Nutanix that cost a lot with other companies."
"The price of the license for Nutanix Acropolis AOS is less expensive than the competition. There is a favorable cost saving. Having only the need to deal with a single vendor, the management of the customer's entire stack is cost-effective."
"I know Nutanix and VxRail have similar prices and licenses. Nutanix is a go-ahead if AHV is used as hypervisor because it is already embedded in the price."
"They should lower the price. If they did they would fall into a more competitive market because the price does scare a lot of potential customers away when they get the quote."
"Its licensing is fine. They provide the flexibility to choose from different options. You can go with the standard plan. You can go with the pro or platinum plan. Generally, our clients go with the pro licenses, but if you go for the platinum license, you get even more capabilities. Their starter license is also quite good."
"The price is good but I think there is still room for improvement on the price."
"The cost seems a bit steep, and I wish it was less expensive."
"StarWind is best price/performance for SMB."
"The license is reusable. We can always rebuild it and apply the license. Then, boom, we get new servers, apply the license, and we're back up and running."
"Licensing is based on nodes rather than TBs, which means that the users are free to increase storage capacity without putting thought into licensing."
"I think the cost of this solution is quite fair."
"When we did all the analysis for StarWind, it was approximately 20 percent less than any of the other solutions that we looked at."
"This solution has competitive prices and the implementation is very easy."
"This solution is very accessible and the pro-level for support is well worth the cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user244362 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 30, 2015
Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod
Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
29%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Nutanix Acropolis and VMware vSphere?
We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We fou...
How do I choose between Cisco Hyperflex HX Series and Nutanix Acropolis AOS?
Cisco HyperFlex HS series vs Nutanix Acropolis AOS Cisco HyperFlex gives extended hyper-convergence functions from core to edge and multi-cloud environments. It helps IT and OT teams deploy hyper...
Which would you choose - Nutanix Acropolis AOS or VMware vSAN?
We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We fou...
What do you like most about StarWind Virtual SAN?
It is easy to use and can monitor system synchronization and check Storage status. StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) combines flash and disks of the cluster and forms a virtual shared storage “pool” acce...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StarWind Virtual SAN?
Make the most of your 30-day trial license, and if needed, you should contact the sales department of StarWind to extend the trial license or upgrade to a full license.
What needs improvement with StarWind Virtual SAN?
The dashboard is functional, but it could benefit from a more modern and visually appealing design. A facelift would not only enhance the overall aesthetics but also improve user experience by maki...
 

Also Known As

Nutanix Acropolis AOS, Nutanix AOS, Nutanix Acropolis
StarWind SAN & NAS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

St. Lukes Health System, the City of Seattle, Yahoo! Japan, Sligro, Empire Life, Hyundai AUS, and many others.
Baker Tilly BVI, CMS Internet, Board Harpeth Hall School
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs. StarWind Virtual SAN and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.