StarWind was the perfect solution that I was looking for: a true, two-node virtual SAN solution.
We're too small for three physical hypervisors, however, we still have two and want high availability. Native vSAN for the hypervisor we use requires two nodes plus a witness, or three, and we just couldn't do that.
In a search for an alternative, I found StarWind. They offer a true two-node setup with agent VMs on each host and two high-bandwidth links to each other, and that's it!
We're a visiting nurse association and rely on redundant hypervisors to keep our patient software up and running around the clock.
Network & Systems Administrator at Clarion Forest VNA
Easy to use with good support and reasonable pricing
Pros and Cons
- "It's very easy to resize disks and they show up in VMware almost instantly."
- "The initial setup got a little confusing at a few points with differences between the VMware version in documentation vs the latest, etc."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It has cut costs that we would've spent on network links and SAN appliance(s), allowing us to just include drives with our hosts and run a Virtual SAN.
Not only that, but the addition of two 10GB links now means that our hypervisor can live-migrate virtual machines very fast between hosts, and data is also synced between StarWind RAID arrays quickly too.
All this combines into a very efficient, fast, and reliable Virtual SAN solution that blazes past our previous physical SAN infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
The accessibility is great. It's very easy to resize disks and they show up in VMware almost instantly. It's pretty darn fast at syncing and I appreciate how friendly it is to SMBs.
Pricing is also very fair and their support is top-notch. I had some trouble setting it up. That said, it didn't take long at all to get in touch with support reps and they were knowledgeable on the product, not just an agent reading a script.
PROS include:
• Relatively easy to use
• True two-node vSAN
• Redundancy
• Stability (no issues in the years thus far of using it)
• Friendly pricing for SMBs and great support
• Great solution for SMB environments overall
What needs improvement?
The only thing I could suggest to improve is the documentation. The initial setup got a little confusing at a few points with differences between the VMware version in documentation vs the latest, etc. However, they've improved the documentation greatly since I got started in 2022 (writing now as of 2025.02.19)
CONS include:
• Documentation for initial setup can be a bit ambiguous at times, yet support helps you get through it; you're good once you're up and running.
• It's not native and not a bad thing. Just keep in mind it's a third-party solution so it won't be as "drop-in" as a native solution offered by your hypervisor.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Since 2022
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
So far. I have had no issues or lapses in performance/stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. It is very easy to add more virtual disks.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is very good! The support rep knew what they were talking about and quickly got back to me with an answer.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before we had a physical SAN, maybe the HP MSA P2300 (I may have gotten the model number wrong).
It was just too expensive and demanding of physical links/resources to go with another MSA, so we decided to try a Virtual SAN.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was both straightforward and complex. It wasn't too hard, however, there were some little parts in the documentation where I got stuck without much help other than calling for a support agent, which solved my issue and cleared up the confusion.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was done in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing is pretty fair and includes one year of support (as of purchase in August 2022).
The license is based on how many hosts you have and how much in TB you need the vSAN to accommodate.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at our native Hypervisor's vSAN product, however, it required three nodes (or two with one witness node) and just wasn't feasible for our setup as an SMB.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Feb 19, 2025
Flag as inappropriate
Senior System Engineer at Giza Systems
Provides a cost-effective way to run an HCI storage platform for almost any hypervisor
Pros and Cons
- "It is easy to use and can monitor system synchronization and check Storage status. StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) combines flash and disks of the cluster and forms a virtual shared storage “pool” accessible by all hosts. StarWind cuts down virtualization cost and complexity by eliminating the need for a physical shared storage (SAN). -StarWind offers the Enterprise-level high availability (HA), deployed and easily configured . we get technical support from star wind team when implementation software and after setup if we face any issue."
- "It provides shared storage to multiple hypervisor hosts. Times had changed, however. StarWind Virtual SAN is the “software replaces hardware” for SAN. We have access control and CCTV systems up and running using Microsoft clustering and shared storage"
- "StarWind offers the Enterprise-level high availability (HA), deployed and easily configured .maintain and update and with little to no fuss, even the free version is incredibly capable whilst it brings a the cost of a Highly Available HCI solution down to a very cost effective point" Having used Starwind Virtual SAN for many years both for clients and for internal systems it has always done exactly what it set out to do, provide a cost effect way to run a HCI storage platform for almost any hypervisor, but it is most effective with Hyper-V, simple, easy to use, -.software monitoring should be web based to be reachable from any workstation in VLAN."
- "The software monitoring should be web-based to be reachable from any VLAN workstation."
What is our primary use case?
Our use case is for an oil and gas site with 200 ATEX cameras and 30 administrative buildings that have 400 indoor and outdoor cameras. All of the cameras are connected to a VLAN switch in each area.
All of the switches are connected to the core switch in the data center through a fibre network between buildings.
We add all cameras to management servers and they are divided to recording servers. There are 30 cameras for each recording server.
We create a Microsoft failover cluster to achieve redundancy between management servers.
Another use case is to create a storage pool (4TB) to store SQL DB to achieve database stability and make it reachable to each server.
How has it helped my organization?
It provides shared storage to multiple hypervisor hosts. Times have changed, however. StarWind Virtual SAN is the “software replaces hardware” for SAN. We have access control and CCTV systems up and running using Microsoft clustering and shared storage
From time to time we face some issues with the storage unit and the whole cluster goes down. We replaced the storage with virtual SAN on both the nodes of each system using StarWind and now the system is more stable and has failover redundancy.
What is most valuable?
It is easy to use and can monitor system synchronization and check the storage status. StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) combines flash and disks of the cluster and forms a virtual shared storage “pool” accessible by all hosts.
StarWind cuts down virtualization costs and complexity by eliminating the need for physical shared storage (SAN).
It offers enterprise-level high availability (HA), deployable and easily configured. We get technical support from their team for the implementation software and if we have any issues.
What needs improvement?
You can maintain and update it with little to no fuss, even the free version is incredibly capable whilst it brings the cost of a Highly Available HCI solution down to a very cost-effective point.
Having used Starwind Virtual SAN for many years both for clients and for internal systems, it has always done exactly what it set out to do. It provides a cost-effective way to run an HCI storage platform for almost any hypervisor, but it is most effective with Hyper-V. It's simple and easy to use,
The software monitoring should be web-based to be reachable from any VLAN workstation.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Director Of Information Technology at Cass County Government
Highly available setup and synchronous replication with the ability for companies to choose hardware
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to choose our own hardware and our own vendors for this was hugely beneficial, as we had pre-existing relationships with vendors we wanted to maintain."
- "I'd love to see native export of metrics (via Prometheus or something of that nature) to allow us to get more metrics available on our existing dashboard software."
What is our primary use case?
We needed a solution that provided highly available storage via ISCSI, replicating to multiple physical sites synchronously. We needed it to be easy to use, easy to manage, and cost-effective. Ideally, there would be no vendor lock-in or special hardware needing to be purchased.
We found StarWind, and this 100% solved our problem. We've used StarWind on a pair of nodes populated with a large amount of flash disks. They then are running on dedicated switches for ISCSI back to our Hyper-V hypervisors, as well as utilizing a dedicated sync link for replication across our metro wan. With this, we're able to have real-time replication of our data between multiple sites.
How has it helped my organization?
The ease of management of StarWind, compared to other vendors, has made it a top winner for us. Not only is it possible for junior sysadmins to understand it - it's also reliable. It's backed up by time-tested systems, such as MPIO, ZFS, and ISCSI.
There's no vendor black magic in a StarWind Box. It's just a box that works. By adding the synchronous repped storage, our system is able to keep real-time data in sync for our virtual machines without having to look into application clustering.
What is most valuable?
The highly available setup and synchronous replication without the need for a quorum node is huge for us. We wanted storage that would sync the replication between two sites as fast as possible. By utilizing StarWind, we were able to set this up quickly, using dedicated connections, and not have to worry about it.
It works as well as can be expected. In addition, the ability to choose our own hardware and our own vendors for this was hugely beneficial, as we had pre-existing relationships with vendors we wanted to maintain.
What needs improvement?
The company is going through a changeover in its current product lineup. This has led to looking stuff up via search engines, hitting both the new and old content, which makes answering questions on your own difficult. I also would have preferred it if I had been able to get pricing before contacting them.
For additional features, I'd love to see native export of metrics (via Prometheus or something of that nature) to allow us to get more metrics available on our existing dashboard software. I'd also like to see a more robust API for controls.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for 12 months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been rock solid. We're running it on a KVM hypervisor and have had no issues in the slightest.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability met our needs; however, it would not perform as well if you added more nodes, as you're increasing your replication delta.
How are customer service and support?
Customer service and support have been great for the little time that we've had to talk to them. They are out of Eastern Europe and are obviously on a virtual phone. This can lead to some audio issues, however, nothing stops it.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Historically, I had used HPE Lefthand for sync rep storage. While it did the job, it was definitely older technology and has been unsettled.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is extremely straightforward. The software is delivered via a template, so rolling it out is like any other VM. Also, the software includes setup support directly with an engineer who is more than willing to answer questions.
What about the implementation team?
We did a combo of both in-house and vendor. We deployed the VM and then had the vendor assist us. I'd rank them a ten out of ten for knowing how their system works and offering various hypervisors access storage.
What was our ROI?
Our ROI has been difficult to calculate as this was a required purchase.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of this is less than you expect. Since they're selling a software stack, you do need to consider your own hardware costs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have gone through the gamut of technologies and examined Linbit, Ceph, non-clustered ZFS, cluster ZFS, HPE Nimble, Pure, and more.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Single sign-on saves time and improves security with multi-factor authentication
Pros and Cons
- "Azure AD is much more user-friendly and has a better integration with our existing infrastructure."
What is our primary use case?
I work as a Senior Systems Administrator at a mid-sized company in the financial services industry.
What is most valuable?
The single sign-on capabilities have been a huge time saver for our users. The multi-factor authentication also adds a much-needed layer of security, especially with so many people working remotely these days. The centralized management is great. Being able to manage user access and permissions from one place simplifies things considerably. The integration with other Microsoft products is also a plus.
What needs improvement?
Initially, there was a bit of a learning curve for some of our users, but Microsoft's documentation was helpful. Also, the pricing can be a bit complex depending on the features you need.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used a previous identity and access management solution before Azure Active Directory. Azure AD is much more user-friendly and has a better integration with our existing infrastructure.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Also, the pricing can be a bit complex depending on the features you need.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would recommend Azure Active Directory to other companies. It’s been a valuable addition to our IT infrastructure.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Apr 25, 2025
Flag as inappropriateInfrastructure architect at Mailo
Seamless integrations, helps extend the lifespan of existing servers, and offers great ROI
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of StarWind Virtual SAN include its cost-effective repurposing of older hardware, seamless integration with vSphere, and high scalability."
- "Areas for improvement in StarWind Virtual SAN include simplifying the setup process, especially for users with limited vSphere expertise."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for StarWind Virtual SAN is to repurpose older servers with substantial disk capacity for use in a three-node vSphere cluster. This setup was for proof of concept (POC) environments for the first time and after to host production workloads.
It allows us to create scalable and cost-effective virtual storage solutions. The integration with vSphere ensures that we can efficiently manage and utilize these resources, enhancing our IT infrastructure while minimizing new hardware and licensing costs.
How has it helped my organization?
StarWind Virtual SAN has greatly benefited our organization by reducing hardware and licensing costs through repurposing older servers with significant disk capacity. It has enabled us to extend the lifespan of our existing hardware and align with sustainability goals, all while providing a cost-effective and scalable storage solution. Its seamless integration with vSphere has improved our storage management and operational efficiency in production environments.
It was our first two steps to a hyper-converged solution.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of StarWind Virtual SAN include its cost-effective repurposing of older hardware, seamless integration with vSphere, and high scalability. It enables us to extend the lifespan of existing servers, significantly cut down on licensing costs, and manage our storage environment efficiently.
Additionally, its flexibility allows us to scale effortlessly by adding nodes (up to 32), which supports our growing storage needs and enhances the adaptability of our production environment.
What needs improvement?
Areas for improvement in StarWind Virtual SAN include simplifying the setup process, especially for users with limited vSphere expertise. Future releases could benefit from an enhanced configuration wizard to streamline deployment and more robust data migration. There is also a need to address the problem of CentOS's end of life.
Additionally, incorporating a built-in backup solution would significantly enhance data protection. Improved features for managing and migrating data effectively would further strengthen the product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three years now
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of StarWind Virtual SAN is robust. The solution performs reliably with minimal downtime, ensuring consistent operation in production environments.
In case of the loss of a node, the reconstruction, depending on the amount of data to synchronize, is always made with no data or integrity loss.
However, the reliance on CentOS, introduces potential future stability risks. Despite this, the system has consistently delivered dependable performance and resilience, maintaining stability even under significant workloads.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution allows for easy expansion by adding nodes (up to 32), which supports growing storage demands and adapts well to increasing workloads. This flexibility ensures that as our storage needs evolve, we can scale the system efficiently without major reconfiguration or downtime.
Overall, its scalability is a significant strength, making it a versatile choice for both current and future requirements.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't experienced support since I used the free version. Anyway, I have found plenty of support from StarWind through their forum.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
It was complex to understand the mechanism of the hyperconverged solution put in place.
The ESXi consumes the virtual disk created by Starwind Vsan from the local disk.
The cabling was not that difficult since I didn't use any for data sync between nodes.
The most difficult part was the usage of PowerShell scripts to create the cluster because the free version doesn't provide a Gui.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was in-house, in a new data center.
What was our ROI?
The ROI was excellent because we reused old servers that already had capacity disks.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If you are comfortable with the solution and you feel that you don't need support, you can begin with the free licences for three nodes.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other options.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Works at PPL
Easy to install, user-friendly, and enhances overall operations
Pros and Cons
- "When it comes to ease of installation, the whole process is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward."
- "The dashboard is functional, but it could benefit from a more modern and visually appealing design."
What is our primary use case?
The product is being utilized within an airgap lab environment, which means it is isolated from external networks and internet connectivity for security reasons. The virtual Storage Area Network (SAN) is integrated into the system alongside Hyper-V, a virtualization platform developed by Microsoft.
This configuration allows for efficient storage management and virtualization capabilities within the isolated environment of the lab. The virtual SAN helps in providing centralized storage resources that can be dynamically allocated to virtual machines running on the Hyper-V infrastructure, enhancing the overall performance and flexibility of the system.
By combining these technologies, users can optimize their lab environment for testing, development, or research purposes without compromising security or network integrity.
How has it helped my organization?
This innovative product has significantly enhanced speed, security, and organization. With its advanced features and capabilities, users can experience improved efficiency and productivity.
The optimization of speed ensures rapid performance, allowing tasks to be completed more quickly and effectively. Additionally, the enhanced security measures provide peace of mind and safeguard sensitive information from potential threats.
Furthermore, the organization features streamlined processes and ensures easy access to important data, ultimately contributing to a more seamless and structured workflow.
This product has proven to be a valuable asset in enhancing overall operations and effectiveness.
What is most valuable?
When it comes to ease of installation, the whole process is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward. With simple step-by-step instructions and all the necessary tools included in the package, setting up the product is a breeze. Even for those who are not particularly tech-savvy, the installation can be completed in a matter of minutes without any hassle. Whether it's assembling a piece of furniture, installing software, or setting up a new device, the ease of installation ensures a smooth and hassle-free experience for users.
What needs improvement?
The dashboard is functional, but it could benefit from a more modern and visually appealing design. A facelift would not only enhance the overall aesthetics but also improve user experience by making it more intuitive and user-friendly.
Updates such as streamlined navigation, clearer data visualization, and customizable widgets could make the dashboard more engaging and efficient for users.
A fresh look and improved functionality would elevate the dashboard to better meet the needs and expectations of users.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One of the standout features of the device is its exceptional stability when used for virtual SANS (Storage Area Network). The stability ensures that data transfer and storage operations are smooth and uninterrupted, making it a reliable and efficient solution for managing and accessing large volumes of data in a network environment.
This feature enhances the overall performance and reliability of the virtual SANS, making it a valuable asset for businesses and organizations that rely on secure and high-speed data storage solutions.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One of the best features of the product is its scalability. This allows users to easily customize and adjust the product to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Whether it's expanding storage capacity, upgrading performance capabilities, or adapting to different user requirements, the scalability of the product ensures versatility and flexibility.
Additionally, scalability often means that the product can grow with the user, accommodating changing needs over time without the need for a complete overhaul or replacement. This feature adds significant value to the product by enhancing its longevity and adaptability in various scenarios.
How are customer service and support?
Their support team is highly knowledgeable and skilled in assisting customers with any technical issues they may encounter.
Whether it's troubleshooting a complex setup, optimizing performance, or addressing compatibility concerns, the StarWind customer service team is well-equipped to provide expert guidance and solutions.
Customers can rely on their technical expertise to ensure smooth implementation and operation of the Virtual SAN solution.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The installation of StarWind Virtual SAN was straightforward and seamless. The user-friendly interface guided me through the process step by step, making it easy to set up and configure.
I was impressed by the clear instructions and the minimal technical knowledge required to get the software up and running. The whole installation process was efficient and well-organized, allowing me to quickly deploy the virtual SAN solution without any hassle.
My experience with installing StarWind Virtual SAN was smooth and hassle-free.
What about the implementation team?
We used an in-house team.
What was our ROI?
We witnessed an ROI within one to three months.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Technology & Product Director at Precise Imaging
Great UI with failover protection and the ability to expand storage
Pros and Cons
- "The failover protection and the ability to expand storage and nodes with no downtime are by far the best physical features we have benefited from."
- "Our company was hoping for deduplication and encryption across HCI. That is currently not supported."
What is our primary use case?
HCI was set up to host our ERP web apps, domain controller, and phone system. We are using this in production, staging, and development with around 40 virtual machines. We are using Linux and Windows with VMware as the ESXi host.
Our main use of StarWind HCI is creating a super-smooth virtualized server setup. It blends tech magic, merging storage, networking, and more into one. We were always running into the issues of needing to add more storage and having to pull down our servers, notify customers of the downtime, etc., however, not anymore.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution offers failover protection and the ability to expand storage and nodes with no downtime. Our customers who use our web apps benefit from nearly zero downtime due to hardware failure, hardware replacement, or upgrades.
Now we are looking at replicating a similar cluster setup for our firewall, switches, and ISP so we can get nearly 0.00% downtime which I know is not possible, however, with the new HCI setup, it is possible to at least almost get there.
Their support is by far the best enterprise-level support I have come across.
What is most valuable?
The failover protection and the ability to expand storage and nodes with no downtime are by far the best physical features we have benefited from. Once we requested help from sales, it was a very easy decision compared to VMware where you get lost among the mess of products and low-trained phone techs.
Their web UI is very basic and that is how it should be. The magic is what their HCI setup does behind the scenes for redundancy and the ability to expand storage without ever having to go offline since another node picks up the storage.
What needs improvement?
Our company was hoping for deduplication and encryption across HCI. That is currently not supported. They used to have it and was removed. Hopefully, both of these features will be coming in upcoming releases.
A built-in DR that can be stretched with high latency would be very helpful as well. We were able to purchase VMware 8 for our hosts. It would be nice if they developed their own ESXi OS to compete with VMware as the other options out there are not great. VMware does what it needs, however, their support is not great.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for one week.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We've had no downtime so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
You can scale as much as your company will need.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is good. Somebody is always available 24/7.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We used StarWind in-house support as they do most of the setup before they send it to you.
What was our ROI?
We've witnessed downtime within two years.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'd advise new users to have sales walk them through all the options and also ask them about purchasing the hardware for you.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I previously evaluated VMware.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Great support, easy to administer, and offers zero loss of performance
Pros and Cons
- "The product only requires two VMWare ESXi host servers versus three host servers for VMware's comparable solution."
- "I struggled when bit figuring out how to go about doing the evaluation."
What is our primary use case?
I am using it to replace an end-of-life NetApp SAN after moving about half of our storage to the cloud. It is reducing the cost when it comes time to replace existing on-site storage (this was part of the cost justification of moving systems to the cloud but quotes provided by several vendors and consultants for replacement systems were actually more than what we paid for the EOL system six years ago). I was greatly relieved that I was able to deliver on my promise to reduce storage costs by half with StarWind vSAN.
How has it helped my organization?
We were able to reduce our on-site storage costs by roughly half what we paid for the previous NetApp SAN six years ago (with no noticeable loss of performance or loss of High Availability). This allowed us to help cost justify the investment we had already made in cloud and Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings with existing vendors without breaking the bank when it came time to replace our end-of-life NetApp SAN. Since only two VMWare ESXi host servers are required, it's allowing us to use local storage; we should also be able to replace the system again the next go around for a similar cost.
What is most valuable?
The product only requires two VMWare ESXi host servers versus three host servers for VMware's comparable solution.
We have detected zero loss of performance and we still have High Availability in place. vSAN has run smoothly with zero issues whatsoever so far.
It's easy to administer.
Support has been great with knowledgeable, helpful, and professional engineers responding quickly.
I had initial concerns there might be a language barrier yet have had zero issues in this area. Communication has been great with both sales and service before and after the sale.
What needs improvement?
I struggled when bit figuring out how to go about doing the evaluation. It would have been helpful to have been able to watch a video or two showing a quick track way to do an evaluation including the easiest approach to take, benchmark tools to use, and step-by-step instructions on how to go about it.
I asked for assistance and was sent information on some tools to use but I struggled with understanding the best way to use them. Having a live person suggest the best, most meaningful way to go about the evaluation based on my individual situation, would have been helpful too.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is rock solid. There is no downtime so far and I have no performance issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability seems solid. You could add nodes if needed.
How are customer service and support?
Support is fantastic. It is quick, responsive, knowledgeable, and professional.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have a NetApp SAN. We switched as our storage was downsized by about half due to moving systems to the cloud and the SAN was EOL.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. A couple of hours on a remote support session with an engineer and we were up and running.
What about the implementation team?
The solution was implemented in-house.
What was our ROI?
I'm not sure how to quantify ROI.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The setup cost was included with the price - so that was great! Buy from them directly rather than going through a reseller and you get 20% off.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated NetApp, Dell, SAN, and NAS solutions. All were way too costly.
What other advice do I have?
Sales and support have been great to work with and the solution is solid without breaking the bank.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Popular Comparisons
VMware vSAN
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
Dell PowerFlex
HPE SimpliVity
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
HPE Alletra dHCI
DataCore SANsymphony
Scality RING
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
StorMagic SvSAN
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
Red Hat Gluster Storage
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?
- Storpool vs. ScaleIO
- When evaluating Software Defined Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are some design considerations to keep in mind for Software Defined Storage Solutions?
- What are the advantages and limitations of Software Defined Storage?
- What are the main storage requirements to support Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning applications?
- What SDS solution do you recommend?
- Why is Software Defined Storage (SDS) important for companies?