Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo

Top 10 StarWind Virtual SAN Alternatives

Vendor: StarWind
4.8 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top StarWind Virtual SAN Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to StarWind Virtual SAN based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware vSAN, Red Hat Ceph Storage, and VxRail. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

StarWind Virtual SAN surpasses its competitors by delivering seamless high availability and fault tolerance, offering an efficient all-flash hyper-converged infrastructure with minimal resource consumption, simplifying IT operations to reduce costs and improve performance.

StarWind Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with StarWind, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
VMware vSAN
4.2 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
VMware vSAN
4.2 out of 5
VMware vSAN excels with seamless integration and scalability, appealing to businesses leveraging VMware environments. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN offers simplicity with efficient performance on commodity hardware. StarWind's competitive pricing is attractive to smaller businesses seeking affordability and robust support.
Download StarWind Virtual SAN vs. VMware vSAN Report
VMware vSAN often incurs higher setup costs compared to StarWind Virtual SAN, which is frequently praised for its affordability and lower initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware vSAN often incurs higher setup costs compared to StarWind Virtual SAN, which is frequently praised for its affordability and lower initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in financial commitment between the two solutions.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ceph Storage is ideal for enterprises requiring scalability and handling large data volumes. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN offers exceptional simplicity and ease of deployment, making it attractive for small to medium-sized businesses seeking cost-effective, quick storage solutions.
Download Red Hat Ceph Storage vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
Red Hat Ceph Storage requires significant setup costs, focusing on scalable infrastructure, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more budget-friendly setup with an emphasis on minimizing upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ceph Storage requires significant setup costs, focusing on scalable infrastructure, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more budget-friendly setup with an emphasis on minimizing upfront expenses.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
VxRail
4.3 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
VxRail
4.3 out of 5
VxRail offers high availability and streamlined administration with robust VMware integration, ideal for unified, high-performance needs. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN emphasizes cost-effectiveness and simple deployment, making it attractive for Microsoft environments seeking affordability and ease of use.
Download StarWind Virtual SAN vs. VxRail Report
VxRail's setup cost is noted for being higher, reflecting its comprehensive infrastructure, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a lower setup cost, appealing with budget-friendly simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
VxRail's setup cost is noted for being higher, reflecting its comprehensive infrastructure, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a lower setup cost, appealing with budget-friendly simplicity.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
4.3 out of 5
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure offers advanced features, accommodating multiple hypervisors with comprehensive data protection, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN emphasizes cost-effectiveness with storage virtualization, making it suitable for small to medium businesses seeking flexible and easy integration.
Download Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure has a higher initial setup cost, offering extensive features and scalability, while StarWind Virtual SAN presents a lower setup cost, focusing on cost-efficient virtualization.
View comparison
Pricing
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure has a higher initial setup cost, offering extensive features and scalability, while StarWind Virtual SAN presents a lower setup cost, focusing on cost-efficient virtualization.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Dell PowerFlex
4.2 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Dell PowerFlex
4.2 out of 5
Dell PowerFlex offers robust hyper-converged solutions and VMware compatibility ideal for large enterprises needing stability and scalability. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN appeals to smaller businesses seeking cost-effective storage virtualization and seamless Microsoft integration for efficient deployment and management.
Download Dell PowerFlex vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
Dell PowerFlex has a higher setup cost compared to StarWind Virtual SAN, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell PowerFlex has a higher setup cost compared to StarWind Virtual SAN, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
HPE SimpliVity
4.3 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
HPE SimpliVity
4.3 out of 5
HPE SimpliVity excels in robust data protection and disaster recovery, supporting efficient VM management. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN provides flexible virtualization of storage, optimizing performance and scalability, appealing to buyers seeking diverse hardware compatibility and seamless storage management.
Download HPE SimpliVity vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
HPE SimpliVity entails higher initial setup costs with robust features, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more budget-friendly setup without compromising on essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE SimpliVity entails higher initial setup costs with robust features, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more budget-friendly setup without compromising on essential functionalities.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct
3.7 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN is favored for its user-friendly deployment, cost-effectiveness, and excellent customer support, appealing to businesses seeking easy integration. In comparison, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct offers high performance and robust integration with Windows Server, ideal for Microsoft-centric environments despite higher costs.
Download Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
StarWind Virtual SAN is highlighted for its lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct. Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is noted for having higher initial expenses, offering different value trade-offs in pricing and implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind Virtual SAN is highlighted for its lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct. Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is noted for having higher initial expenses, offering different value trade-offs in pricing and implementation.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
4.0 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN is valued for its performance, ease of installation, and cost efficiency by supporting commodity hardware. In comparison, Sangfor HCI offers competitive pricing with strong data protection, but lacks technologies such as SAS configuration, which StarWind supports.
Download Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
StarWind Virtual SAN has a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure presents a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind Virtual SAN has a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure presents a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
HPE Alletra dHCI
4.0 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
HPE Alletra dHCI
4.0 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN is valued for its high availability and cost-effective scalability with existing hardware. In comparison, HPE Alletra dHCI excels in predictive analytics and simplified management, appealing to buyers needing advanced performance and stability for enterprise environments.
Download HPE Alletra dHCI vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
StarWind Virtual SAN has a significantly lower setup cost compared to HPE Alletra dHCI, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind Virtual SAN has a significantly lower setup cost compared to HPE Alletra dHCI, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
DataCore SANsymphony
4.6 out of 5
DataCore SANsymphony excels with advanced auto-tiering and integration flexibility. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness, with notable active-active high availability. Tech buyers choose DataCore for robust features and StarWind for affordability and deployment ease.
Download DataCore SANsymphony vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
DataCore SANsymphony has a higher setup cost but offers robust enterprise features, while StarWind Virtual SAN is more cost-effective with straightforward implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
DataCore SANsymphony has a higher setup cost but offers robust enterprise features, while StarWind Virtual SAN is more cost-effective with straightforward implementation.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Scality RING
4.1 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Scality RING
4.1 out of 5
Scality RING excels in scalability for large-scale storage needs. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN provides robust performance with seamless integration. Scality's strengths lie in massive data management, while StarWind caters to diverse infrastructures seeking quick deployment and efficient resource use.
Download Scality RING vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
Scality RING involves a significant initial investment with complex setup requirements, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more cost-effective setup with straightforward implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Scality RING involves a significant initial investment with complex setup requirements, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more cost-effective setup with straightforward implementation.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN
4.3 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN
4.3 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN appeals with cost-effectiveness and ease of integration, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN attracts those seeking advanced features like synchronous replication. StorMagic’s quick ROI suits smaller deployments, while StarWind’s robust capabilities benefit enterprises focused on performance.
Download StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN is praised for low setup costs, offering an affordable entry point, whereas StarWind Virtual SAN is noted for having higher initial setup expenses, highlighting a significant pricing differential between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN is praised for low setup costs, offering an affordable entry point, whereas StarWind Virtual SAN is noted for having higher initial setup expenses, highlighting a significant pricing differential between the two solutions.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
4.2 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN excels in performance and stability with versatile hardware compatibility, attractive pricing, and high availability features. In comparison, Dell vSAN Ready Nodes offer strong file sharing and flexibility but face challenges in scalability and upfront costs.
Download Dell vSAN Ready Nodes vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
StarWind Virtual SAN offers lower setup costs compared to Dell vSAN Ready Nodes, which tend to be higher.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind Virtual SAN offers lower setup costs compared to Dell vSAN Ready Nodes, which tend to be higher.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Red Hat Gluster Storage
4.1 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN provides cost-effective solutions with easy deployment and robust support, ideal for budget-conscious environments. In comparison, Red Hat Gluster Storage offers scalability and flexibility, justifying its higher costs for complex storage needs and diverse enterprise applications.
Download Red Hat Gluster Storage vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
StarWind Virtual SAN offers a straightforward setup process, while Red Hat Gluster Storage presents a more complex and costly initial setup. With distinct setup costs, these solutions cater to different budgetary and operational requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind Virtual SAN offers a straightforward setup process, while Red Hat Gluster Storage presents a more complex and costly initial setup. With distinct setup costs, these solutions cater to different budgetary and operational requirements.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
HPE StoreVirtual
4.1 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
HPE StoreVirtual
4.1 out of 5
HPE StoreVirtual offers an all-in-one solution with high availability and seamless integration across various platforms. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN is cost-effective and leverages existing hardware, providing flexible deployment options, high performance, and significant infrastructure cost savings.
Download HPE StoreVirtual vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
HPE StoreVirtual typically involves higher setup costs, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE StoreVirtual typically involves higher setup costs, while StarWind Virtual SAN offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StorPool
5.0 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StorPool
5.0 out of 5
StorPool offers streamlined management and scalability for demanding workloads. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN attracts tech buyers with robust integration and a fault-tolerant architecture, appealing despite higher costs. StorPool ensures cost-effectiveness, while StarWind prioritizes advanced features and diverse enterprise solutions.
Download StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorPool Report
StorPool requires a lower setup cost compared to StarWind Virtual SAN, which involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
StorPool requires a lower setup cost compared to StarWind Virtual SAN, which involves higher initial expenses.
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
Acronis Cyber Infrastructure
3.7 out of 5
StarWind Virtual SAN is noted for simplified storage and integrated virtualization, ideal for those prioritizing cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure offers extensive features and scalability, suitable for organizations needing comprehensive infrastructure and robust data protection, despite higher upfront costs.
Download Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. StarWind Virtual SAN Report
StarWind Virtual SAN tends to have a lower setup cost compared to Acronis Cyber Infrastructure, which may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
StarWind Virtual SAN tends to have a lower setup cost compared to Acronis Cyber Infrastructure, which may require a higher initial investment.

Related categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS)
HCI
File and Object Storage