Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Reviews

Vendor: Sonar
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

What is SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)?

Featured SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in the Application Security Tools category stands at 22.4%, down from 26.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)22.4%
Checkmarx One10.3%
Veracode8.8%
Other58.5%
Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Security ToolsAug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonSonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs VeracodeAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonSonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx OneAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonSonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Advanced SecurityAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
GitLab4.22.6%97%85 interviewsAdd to research
Snyk4.07.2%100%48 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise55
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business1641
Midsize Enterprise1204
Large Enterprise5631
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
6%
Insurance Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Educational Organization
3%
University
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Construction Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) with alternative products

Learn more about SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Related questions

 
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Sr Software Engineering Supervisor at Mozarc Medical4.5I use SonarQube Server for static code analysis to detect build vulnerabilities, valuing its rule control despite ongoing scanning issues. Transitioning from Coverity, I see ROI due to its FDA approval, essential for our reports.
Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com4.5I use SonarQube Server for static code analysis to enhance code quality and manage technical debt. Its valuable features include code suggestions and customizable metric tracking, though it could improve by integrating AI. It replaced AppScan, offering better functionality.
Senior Manager Product Engineering at GlobalLogic4.5My company uses SonarQube for static code analysis and unit test coverage. While it provides comprehensive insights, it can sometimes trigger false alarms. Its integration helps identify bugs in the testing phase, though improvements with AI could be beneficial.
Distinguish Engineer at Gtmhub4.5I use SonarQube Server for static code analysis in our Jenkins CI builds, primarily on Golang projects. It effectively identifies code issues and improvements. Although satisfied, potential enhancements could include bill of materials functionality. We switched from Snyk for cost efficiency.
Consultant at Green method4.0I use SonarQube for static code analysis due to its structured and native integration, especially compared to tools like GitHub Advanced Security. While its flaw detection is effective, enhancing the analytics engine would significantly improve analysis and reporting capabilities.
Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS4.0I use SonarQube Server primarily for security vulnerabilities and static code analysis. It is admin-friendly but lacks developer-centric features and needs an improved SonarLint plugin. Compared to Snyk and Coverity, SonarQube is preferable for being open-source.
Tools manager at Harmony international4.0At our company, we use SonarQube to scan Dot.Net and Java sources, supporting various languages and offering an open-source model. However, improvements are needed for C/C++ compatibility and potential AI integration like GitHub Copilot.
Application Security Coordinator at Banco Votorantim4.0I work in vulnerability management and use SonarQube and Veracode for security verification. SonarQube offers valuable features for fixing issues, but needs better security analysis and software composition analysis. Despite this, it provides ROI by preventing rework.