No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
SAP BusinessObjects GRC Logo

SAP BusinessObjects GRC Reviews

Vendor: SAP
3.7 out of 5

What is SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

Featured SAP BusinessObjects GRC reviews

SAP BusinessObjects GRC mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of SAP BusinessObjects GRC in the Continuous Controls Monitoring category stands at 12.2%, down from 17.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Controls Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAP BusinessObjects GRC12.2%
ACL Analytics20.4%
CaseWare IDEA SymSure Monitor11.4%
Other56.00000000000001%
Continuous Controls Monitoring

PeerResearch reports based on SAP BusinessObjects GRC reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContinuous Controls MonitoringMar 30, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonSAP BusinessObjects GRC vs ACL AnalyticsMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonSAP BusinessObjects GRC vs XM CyberMar 30, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
RSA Archer4.0N/A92%42 interviewsAdd to research
Netwrix Auditor4.6N/A100%8 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise36
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Construction Company
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
Media Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Non Profit
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Performing Arts
4%
Logistics Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Transportation Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Translation And Localization Position
1%
Security Firm
1%
University
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Retailer
1%
 
SAP BusinessObjects GRC Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Sr Advanced Analytics Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees4.0I’ve used SAP BusinessObjects GRC for over 13 years, appreciating its customizable dashboards and real-time monitoring. It’s stable and secure, though better real-time alerts for unauthorized access would improve it. The setup varies but is manageable.
SAP GRC Specialist Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.0As a consultant implementing SAP BusinessObjects GRC, I find its workflow management valuable but needing improvement. The BRFplus component lacks stability, leading to client dissatisfaction. Despite its status as an SAP native solution, reliability issues persist.
Active Supervisor at Social Insurance Organizaton3.0I use SAP BusinessObjects GRC primarily for reporting in my company, facilitating the creation of both project and ad-hoc reports with access to various data sources. Despite being an older system, it effectively supports our reporting needs.
Deputy Finance Director at Abdul Latif Jameel4.0I use BusinessObjects for reports, valuing its GRC tools for control and risk management. It's dated and not user-friendly. While SAP offers great scalability, BusinessObjects needs predictive analytics and easier BPC implementation to improve.
Business Intelligence Senior Developer II at Ethiopian Airlines4.0I've used this scalable and flexible solution for six years, finding it greatly improved our reporting culture. While setup is complex and the learning curve high, its stability makes it a valuable tool, rated 8/10.
DGM at Bharat Electronics Limited4.0I find this on-premises solution stable and scalable with a straightforward setup, though the license is costly. I would like better integration and faster technical support. I've used it since 2007 and rate it 8/10.
IT Consultant at CASS3.5SAP BusinessObjects GRC needs better system login capabilities and improved support, as I couldn't actively log in. There were no other solutions previously used or considered, and no information about ROI or deployment providers was provided.