RSA Archer vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC comparison

Why PeerSpot?

RSA and SAP are both solutions in the GRC category. RSA is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.5, while SAP is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. RSA holds a 5.9% mindshare in G, compared to SAP’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of RSA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SAP users who would recommend it.

RSA Archer

Read 42 RSA Archer reviews

9,982 Views
8,884 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Read 7 SAP BusinessObjects GRC reviews

2,200 Views
1,826 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

RSA Archer

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

SAP BusinessObjects GRC and RSA Archer compete in governance, risk, and compliance solutions. SAP BusinessObjects GRC holds the advantage with its strong integration capabilities, enhancing its value proposition for existing SAP users.

Features: SAP BusinessObjects GRC provides seamless integration with SAP, advanced auditing tools, and strong monitoring capabilities. RSA Archer offers customizable risk management solutions, advanced workflow management, and robust reporting features.

Room for Improvement: SAP BusinessObjects GRC could enhance the stability of its BRFplus component, improve workflow customization, and optimize reporting for non-SAP environments. RSA Archer could enhance its data schema modification processes, refine its integration with third-party tools, and simplify its interface for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP BusinessObjects GRC offers integration-focused deployment and comprehensive support for SAP users. RSA Archer provides modular deployment options catering to diverse needs, supplemented by responsive support services.

Pricing and ROI: SAP BusinessObjects GRC generally involves higher setup costs due to extensive integration features, providing value through increased operational efficiencies. RSA Archer offers a flexible pricing model with ROI dependent on the benefits of customization and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed RSA Archer vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

RSA Archer vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

RSA Archer

Ranking in GRC

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (1st), IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Ranking in GRC

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the GRC category, the mindshare of RSA Archer is 5.9%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP BusinessObjects GRC is 1.4%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
RSA Archer	5.9%
SAP BusinessObjects GRC	1.4%
Other	92.7%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Celda Juby

Information Security Specialist at Dubai Health Authority

Centralized management strengthens compliance with good look and feel

From my perspective as a customer and end user, Archer has an impressive look and feel, but the most adaptive feature is its ease of configuration which helps to enhance our process according to our maturity. It's more about our organization getting centralized with an integrated approach that focuses on risk governance and compliance. When can provide a detailed dashboards to management with the details of risks from top-down or bottom-up prioritizing actions based on its criticality or necessity. This allows us to show end users and management where the issues lie and effectively demonstrate accountability and visibility in compliance.

Read full review

Vishal Guthula

Sr Advanced Analytics Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Experienced security and easy understanding with advanced customization enhances efficiency

Regarding automation, they could enhance features for checking real-time data when someone attempts to access data without proper permissions. Currently, we do not receive immediate alerts; we only discover issues after something goes wrong. Having prevention alerts immediately when someone triggers unauthorized actions would allow us to address these situations proactively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."

"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."

"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."

"Archer seamlessly integrates data systems without requiring additional software."

"Its ROI is quite high when you look at how long it takes for people to input stuff for compliance risk, vulnerability management, and threat management."

"The main benefit is that we can automate risk management."

"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."

"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."

More RSA Archer pros

"The customization options in the dashboards inside SAP BusinessObjects GRC are highly valuable, and the real-time monitoring feature performs effectively, allowing teams to maintain data security by restricting domain visibility."

"The stability of SAP BusinessObjects GRC is acceptable."

"We have enterprise clients for the product."

"It improved the organization's reporting culture, giving us insights into health, management, and operational results."

"The best features are the scalability and flexibility to implement applications on top of the BW."

"Initial setup was straightforward. It took maybe one week."

"The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports"

"It is wonderful from the control perspective. The GRC tools help you in knowing what are the risk controls, how to mitigate risks, and how to ensure that there are no conflicts between the roles. From the user perspective, you get to know what are the permission risks and access risks. You get a lot of useful information."

Cons

"There are some issues with the interface for version 6.5 but these may already be repaired and simplified in the new versions that have been released."

"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."

"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."

"It would be useful for customers if COBIT 2019 could be translated into different languages."

"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."

"Other tools, specifically designed for audit management have a better GUI than Archer."

"Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed."

"The solution as a whole could be simplified."

More RSA Archer cons

"I think the old system is better than the new one. From an improvement perspective, the tool needs to ensure that the new technologies it offers are better than the old ones."

"Technical support could be better and faster."

"An additional feature I would like to see is the option to add wait time and integrate sources in wait time."

"The learning curve is high."

"BusinessObjects is very dated. It is not that user-friendly. It should be made more user-friendly. In addition, if they could make predictive analytics an embedded part of it where people get to know what is there to offer, it would be great."

"Currently, we do not receive immediate alerts; we only discover issues after something goes wrong."

"BusinessObjects is very dated. It is not that user-friendly."

"I am working on features that are not functioning as expected, which creates significant difficulties in management."

More SAP BusinessObjects GRC cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fairly highly-priced, especially for smaller companies."

"The price of the solution is very affordable."

"RSA Archer's price is justifiable and not as expensive, compared to ServiceNow. I have heard that the licensing for ServiceNow is much more expensive. I'm unaware whether there are any additional costs after licensing fees."

"The solution is not at all a cheap product."

"At the higher end of the price scale, but provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products."

"As I am a developer and responsible for providing production support, I do not have personal knowledge of the pricing. However, my colleagues claim that it is very expensive in comparison with other tools."

"The initial purchase is cheap. You pay a nominal price to start then renew the license annually. You also must buy a license for each module. I'm not too fond of that aspect of the licensing model. You buy the elephant and then spend more money to feed the elephant."

"It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing."

More RSA Archer pricing and cost advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost. I would rate their pricing 4 out of 5."

"The product's licensing costs involve a one-time purchase. The tool also allows others to make annual payments towards the licensing charges of the product."

"SAP BusinessObjects GRC is expensive."

"The license is costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Healthcare Company

14%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with RSA Archer?

While it provides benefits in terms of security, the pricing is a bit higher than customers typically expect. It would be helpful if RSA Archer had the capability for two-way integration because, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?

Regarding the compliance, risk, and governance tools, I am comfortable discussing the tools in the GRC category. The specific module from ServiceNow is the ServiceNow Compliance, Risk, and Governan...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Archer?

I have been in touch with about three companies who use RSA Archer actively in the compliance area. These companies use RSA Archer for nearly all purposes, including governance, internal risk, and ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

I work with SAP, and currently I am working with other domains such as Power BI, Microsoft, and in the AI sector. When working with Microsoft, I utilize solutions such as Intune, Configuration Mana...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

The overall rating for SAP BusinessObjects GRC is 8.5 out of 10. I would rate GRC solutions at eight. Nothing is perfect; if someone attempts to hack, they can create issues. The method and process...

See all answers

Comparisons

MetricStream vs RSA Archer

Compared 6% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs RSA Archer

Compared 5% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs RSA Archer

Compared 4% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

LogicManager vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA Archer Competitors

ACL Analytics vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 12% of the time

Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 11% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 6% of the time

Security Weaver vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 5% of the time

MetricStream vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP BusinessObjects GRC Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

RSA Archer

September 2026

Download RSA Archer product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

August 2026

Download SAP BusinessObjects GRC product report

Also Known As

Archer

BusinessObjects GRC

Overview

RSA Archer provides robust risk management, compliance, and vendor management with intuitive features for customizable and streamlined governance tasks.

RSA Archer delivers integrated solutions supporting risk management and compliance tasks. Its adaptive interface and customizable options enhance workflows, making it valuable for organizations requiring automation, advanced workflows, and easy integration capabilities. While offering flexibility and configuration power, users note potential enhancements for integration, reporting, and interface updates.

What are the key features of RSA Archer?

Easy Implementation: Facilitates quick setup and deployment.
Automation: Streamlines routine tasks for efficiency.
Advanced Workflows: Allows configuration of complex processes.
Dashboards: Provides visual insights into organizational data.
Integration Capabilities: Ensures seamless connectivity with external systems.
Reporting Features: Generates detailed reports for informed decision-making.
Customizable Permissions: Enhances control over access and roles.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Streamlined Processes: Reduces time spent on regulatory compliance tasks.
Improved Data Integration: Offers cohesive and actionable insights.
Configuration Flexibility: Adapts to specific business requirements.
Risk Mitigation: Enhances the ability to manage potential risks proactively.
Enhanced Governance: Strengthens adherence to industry standards and policies.

In the finance, public, and IT sectors, RSA Archer is utilized for managing risk and compliance. Organizations leverage its capabilities for third-party risk, policy management, and security assessments, providing tailored solutions for regulatory compliance and operational risk management. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow enhances its utility within enterprise environments.

RSA

SAP BusinessObjects GRC provides robust risk control and management features, offering companies valuable tools for identifying and mitigating permission and access risks. It supports high customization, comprehensive reporting, and real-time monitoring to ensure data security.

SAP BusinessObjects GRC delivers scalability and flexibility with strong workflow management, enabling organizations to effectively analyze and report data. The system supports various data source integrations, with dashboards that allow high customization and real-time domain restriction monitoring. While the BRFplus component requires improvements in stability, creating both standard and ad-hoc reports remains efficient, enhancing functionality in diverse projects. However, the platform needs improvements in user-friendly interfaces and system reliability, as users often experience a steep learning curve and login difficulties. Enhancements in predictive analytics, consolidated business planning, and real-time alert mechanisms would benefit users further.

What are the key features of SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

Scalability and Flexibility: Adapts to diverse project requirements.
Effective Risk Control: Identifies and mitigates access risks efficiently.
Comprehensive Reporting: Supports standard and ad-hoc report creation.
Real-Time Monitoring: Ensures data security with domain restrictions.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows high-level customization for varied needs.

What benefits should users look for in SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

Improved Data Security: Real-time monitoring for unauthorized access.
Enhanced Workflow Management: Streamlined processes with strong integrations.
Efficiency in Reporting: Faster report generation for better decision-making.
Supports Predictive Analysis: Facilitates advanced data insights.
Security Management: Proactive approach to user permissions and risks.

In industries where precise analytical and reporting capabilities are required, SAP BusinessObjects GRC is implemented alongside SAP Analytics Cloud for user-defined KPIs, trend reports, and financial consolidations. Organizations benefit from detailed security management and web intelligence, utilizing the platform extensively for report administration, installs, upgrades, and security enhancements, often with consultant support for optimal implementation.

SAP

Sample Customers

T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Banco Galicia

Buyer's Guide

RSA Archer vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC

September 2026

Free Report: RSA Archer vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Archer vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our RSA Archer vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.