We performed a comparison between ACL Analytics and SAP BusinessObjects GRC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its powerful data control capabilities."
"It is very flexible and has hundreds of functions."
"Initial setup is straightforward."
"It improved my organization using an automated audit revision with scripts."
"I like the fact that in the duplicate section, I can find matches, and I can find situations where certain cells or certain cell points match, but there's a difference as well between two different records."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spreadsheets or other documents for incorporation into reports is particularly helpful."
"It is wonderful from the control perspective. The GRC tools help you in knowing what are the risk controls, how to mitigate risks, and how to ensure that there are no conflicts between the roles. From the user perspective, you get to know what are the permission risks and access risks. You get a lot of useful information."
"Initial setup was straightforward. It took maybe one week."
"The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports"
"We have enterprise clients for the product."
"The best features are the scalability and flexibility to implement applications on top of the BW."
"The product's pricing has increased over the years."
"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."
"The ease of use could be better."
"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."
"I think the old system is better than the new one. From an improvement perspective, the tool needs to ensure that the new technologies it offers are better than the old ones."
"BusinessObjects is very dated. It is not that user-friendly. It should be made more user-friendly. In addition, if they could make predictive analytics an embedded part of it where people get to know what is there to offer, it would be great."
"We cannot actively log in to the system. It should also improve support."
"An additional feature I would like to see is the option to add wait time and integrate sources in wait time."
"Technical support could be better and faster."
ACL Analytics is ranked 6th in GRC with 5 reviews while SAP BusinessObjects GRC is ranked 14th in GRC with 5 reviews. ACL Analytics is rated 9.4, while SAP BusinessObjects GRC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ACL Analytics writes "Helps to find matches and also the situations where certain cell points match, but there's a difference between two different records". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP BusinessObjects GRC writes "Improved our organization's reporting culture and has given us insights into operational results". ACL Analytics is most compared with Galvanize HighBond, SAS Enterprise GRC, RSA Archer, Workiva Wdesk and MEGA HOPEX, whereas SAP BusinessObjects GRC is most compared with Greenlight Continuous Monitoring, RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages, Security Weaver and Oracle GRC Controls. See our ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC report.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
