Red Hat CloudForms Reviews

Red Hat CloudForms users find the pricing high, though cheaper than VMware, with a subscription-based model costing around $20,000 annually for unlimited users. Despite everything being included, licensing depends on the number of servers. While seen as expensive, the price structure presents no challenges.

• "Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."
• "The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."
• "Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

Customer service and support for Red Hat CloudForms are generally satisfactory, with users often finding technical support effective. They express satisfaction, although there is some uncertainty regarding future support and life cycle due to IBM's acquisition. Some find technical expertise lacking post-merger. Others, accustomed to self-support, use it less frequently. Instances of network configuration issues are mentioned, impacting support effectiveness occasionally. Ratings vary, with some users giving high marks, while others rate support lower.

Red Hat CloudForms exhibits good scalability, accommodating various user groups smoothly. Organizations, including large enterprises, report ease in expanding and managing resources. User counts range significantly, indicating flexibility. Some administrators rate scalability a seven out of ten. While scalability isn't challenging, it is noteworthy that some entities haven't tested extensive scaling, yet still find the framework satisfactory for their needs. Red Hat CloudForms effectively supports user needs across diverse settings.

Red Hat CloudForms exhibits strong stability. Users consistently experience minimal issues, reporting no bugs, crashes, or glitches. It provides high availability once operational, and stability receives a favorable rating, often around seven or eight out of ten. Although some suggest improvements, stability remains a key strength as users have not experienced significant disruptions in configuration or deployment phases. Most consider it a reliable option in their environments.