Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PyCharm Logo

PyCharm Reviews

Vendor: JetBrains
4.3 out of 5

What is PyCharm?

Featured PyCharm reviews

PyCharm mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of PyCharm in the Static Code Analysis category stands at 2.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PyCharm2.2%
Veracode13.3%
Checkmarx One10.1%
Other74.4%
Static Code Analysis
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise25
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
15%
University
14%
Marketing Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Transportation Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
3%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Leisure / Travel Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Government
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
 
PyCharm Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5I use PyCharm mainly for MLOps and value its Jupyter support, scientific/ML libraries, Hugging Face integration, and strong code editor plus Git/VCS workflow. It can be memory-heavy and slow to start/index, remote setup is cumbersome, but support and pricing are good.
Senior Consultant at Mark Gurry & Associates4.5I use PyCharm for rapid prototyping mainly in GenAI, appreciating its support for frameworks like Django and Flask, and intelligent features like code completion. Though its refactoring needs improvement compared to IntelliJ, it saves me time and money overall.
Senior Cyber Security Consultant at BIP4.5I've used PyCharm for 5–6 years at work and find it comfortable, with helpful AI features and a good debugger. Breakpoints could be clearer, but overall it's reliable, easy to install, and I’d rate it a nine.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.0I found PyCharm stable and feature-rich, but its high cost limits adoption in our team, which prefers the free Visual Studio. The setup was easy, though broader usage would benefit from a free community edition like IntelliJ's.
Director at Freelance4.5I use PyCharm for writing quantitative libraries, data manipulation tools, and Django applications. Its unit testing integration is excellent, enhancing productivity. However, it uses heavy resources. I switched from Vim and found PyCharm preferable to Visual Studio Code for consistency.
Vice President at E-Cell Ramaiah4.0I use PyCharm for running, testing, and debugging code. It integrates well with GitHub, enhancing coding efficiency with features like documentation previews. However, it consumes significant memory, reducing laptop battery life, making alternatives like Visual Studio Code preferable for smaller projects.
Technical lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0I use PyCharm for software development, especially Python development across frameworks like Django and Flask. It offers excellent IDE features, source control integration, and AI-powered code completion, but it can be memory-intensive if too many files are open.
Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie5.0I use PyCharm for developing complex software projects with robotic operating systems. It offers a user-friendly environment and supports robotics tools, though it lacks some OpenCV features. More support for ROS development would enhance my experience further.