Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Ping Identity Platform | 3.2% |
| Microsoft Entra ID | 6.5% |
| Okta Platform | 4.8% |
| Other | 85.5% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Authentication Systems | May 2, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 2, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID | May 2, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Ping Identity Platform vs Cisco Duo | May 2, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Ping Identity Platform vs Okta Platform | May 2, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Entra ID | 4.3 | 6.5% | 95% | 277 interviewsAdd to research |
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud | 4.1 | N/A | 97% | 72 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 172 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 103 |
| Large Enterprise | 579 |
This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.
What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.
Ping Identity Platform was previously known as Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Analyst at Toll Group | 4.0 | I found Ping Identity Platform excellent for its SSO, adaptive MFA, and no-code Identity Orchestration, with robust API security and customization. However, it faces premium pricing, complex implementation, and limited pre-built apps and customer support. |
| VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision | 5.0 | I find Ping Identity Platform a lightweight, converged IAM leader with robust features, including passwordless and comprehensive MFA. It integrates easily. I'd like its IGA capability beyond SaaS to improve. I rate it nine out of ten. |
| Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo | 5.0 | I rate Ping Identity Platform 10/10, appreciating its no-code IAM, flexible SSO, and Generative AI for security and automation in GRC. While colleagues mentioned API/security issues, my experience was positive, streamlining workflows effectively. |
| Sr. IAM Engineer at Southwest Airlines | 4.5 | I use Ping for seamless SSO/MFA, appreciating its Kerberos integration and scalability with clustering. Though integration requires programming and user migration can be challenging, I rate it highly. Vigilance during setup is crucial due to security implications. |
| Ping Engineer at Equitable | 3.5 | I value Ping Identity Platform's RBAC, scalability, and easy setup, despite occasional stability issues. It's not expensive, good for user identification, and I recommend it at a 7/10 rating. |
| Senior IAM Platform Enigeer at Loblaw Companies Limited | 4.0 | I've used PingFederate for three years for secure identity management, valuing its centralized authentication and scalability. I see room for UI, performance, and documentation improvements. Support is decent, and despite minor issues, I rate it 8/10. |
| Sr IAM Consultant at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I rely on Ping Identity Platform for comprehensive access management, valuing its strong biometric security and scalability. While stable with good support, I believe it needs improvement in passwordless authentication. Overall, I recommend this solution. |
| IAM lead at Tata Consultancy | 4.0 | I find this platform offers robust identity management and scalability for AWS migrations. While setup is complex and device tracking needs improvement, its reliable performance and features justify the cost for enterprises prioritizing on-prem security. |