Google Cloud Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Google and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Ping Identity is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 10.7% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Ping Identity’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Identity

Read 26 Google Cloud Identity reviews

5,216 Views
4,642 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

6,348 Views
2,095 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Identity

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Google Cloud Identity are competing products in identity management. Google Cloud Identity is perceived as superior due to its comprehensive features, making it a favorable investment.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers robust single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and strong security controls tailored for complex environments. It supports a range of authentication methods and allows extensive customization. Google Cloud Identity provides seamless integration with Google services, ease of use, and advanced security features suitable for cloud-based ecosystems. Its capabilities include multifactor authentication, group access management, and integration with Google Workspace.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could benefit from enhanced integration options with non-standard applications and simplification of its user interface. It might also improve support documentation for new users. Google Cloud Identity may improve by expanding its security features to match the depth of more security-focused solutions, offering more detailed controls for multifactor authentication, and providing better user training resources to ease the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform presents a structured deployment model with dedicated customer support, ensuring a smoother setup process for clients. Google Cloud Identity benefits from its flexible cloud-based deployment model, which enhances scalability and provides integrated support within Google's ecosystem, although it may require a steeper learning curve for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform follows a traditional pricing model with potentially higher upfront costs, emphasizing security and potentially leading to substantial ROI for organizations prioritizing secure identity management. Google Cloud Identity offers competitive pricing, appealing to businesses utilizing Google's services, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced productivity and security features with less focus on individual security configurations compared to Ping Identity Platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,108 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Identity

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (10th), Cloud Resource Access Management (5th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Access Management (4th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Identity is 10.7%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 3.8%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	3.8%
Google Cloud Identity	10.7%
Other	85.5%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Bhushan Ladkhedkar

Head - Work Transformation at Econz

User lifecycle management becomes streamlined with unified access and context-aware policies

If applications support SAML protocols, integration is always an easy task. However, there are difficulties with form-based applications or LDAP-based applications, particularly traditional applications. We need more flexibility not only with SAML but also with LDAP-based and form-based applications. Context-aware access currently only works with SAML-based applications. If other application integrations could support context-aware access, that would be helpful, as companies are in a transition mode with various traditional, form-based, and LDAP-based applications. Mobile device management could be improved. Through Google Cloud Identity, we can manage Android applications and have control over iOS devices, but container functionality is missing. This is particularly important for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) scenarios, especially in India where the market is now split equally between iOS and Android users. Improvements in this area and integration capabilities would be beneficial.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think the first thing that is great is that it gives you a lot of features, like login, and then vaulted passwords and secure LDAP. It becomes easier for the end customer to leverage all those features without going to a higher SKU of G Suite."

"It is a very stable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"Although we have not looked at the whole product and explored it completely, we find that all the authentication features that we are using now are valuable."

"The most valuable feature is that you can manage users from one central location."

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Identity is group access. You are able to assign policies to groups instead of users individually."

"One of the most useful features was the single sign-on. You can use it as an identity provider or service provider. And you can use their organization unit feature to enable or disable some of the features for a specific group of users."

"The main control page and the ability to manage all our users from a web-based portal are the most valuable aspects of the solution. That's particularly useful because we're a heterogeneous network."

"Google is always on its own. Google Cloud Identity is pretty good on every point."

More Google Cloud Identity pros

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"It offers robust features and customization options that justify the cost."

"I work on the application onboarding process because we have multiple customers and get data from different sources."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"People use the solution to secure their applications and authenticate particular processes."

"It is a very stable solution."

"This is a user-friendly solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"Google Cloud Identify could make the technology used easier to understand as a layman making it more user-friendly."

"Google Cloud Identity can be improved by having better integration with Active Directory, but since Active Directory is also a Microsoft solution, we don't think it will happen; that's the only disadvantage of Google."

"Mobile device management could be improved. Through Google Cloud Identity, we can manage Android applications and have control over iOS devices, but container functionality is missing."

"The one place it could be improved is the password vaulting. The password vaulting does not prevent the admins from reading users' passwords, and that's a debate."

"The customer service and support team is not so good."

"I want the tool to improve its support. It should also incorporate some functionalities. Currently, preparing presentations in Google is a pain point. The tool’s certain features like user provisioning are not intuitive as well. The product’s LDAP support is very poor. Clients do not trust the product due to the spam."

"We cannot manage the attributes of SSPR."

"The solution needs to better integrate with Mac's OS."

More Google Cloud Identity cons

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."

"The fees are paid monthly and there are no additional costs other than the licensing fees."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"When I worked on Cloud Identity, they offered a free or enterprise version. You can synchronize and create up to 100 user identities in the free version. After that, you have to purchase a business or enterprise license. In that model, you'll be charged based on the number of users."

"The licensing cost depends on the partners and the relationship between the company and the partners."

"We probably spend about $50,000 a year on licensing."

More Google Cloud Identity pricing and cost advice

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The product is costly."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also access to both Microsoft’s user community as well as around-the-clock customer s...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Identity?

It's crucial to monitor costs carefully, as there can be unexpected charges. I have been charged even when there was supposed to be free credit.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Identity?

If you are asking about room for improvement with Google Cloud Identity, whatever is there already, cost is the only problem. If you are comparing with GCP, OCI, the cost will be a little bit highe...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingFederate?

PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingFederate?

It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingFederate?

We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 81% of the time

Okta Platform vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

OneLogin vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 1% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity

March 2026

Download Google Cloud Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

February 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

Cloud Identity, Cloud Identity Premium

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Cloud Identity is an Identity as a Service (IDaaS) and enterprise mobility management (EMM) product. It offers the identity services and endpoint administration that are available in G Suite as a stand-alone product. As an administrator, you can use Cloud Identity to manage your users, apps, and devices from a central location - the Google Admin console.

Google

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

ExtraHop Networks, HealthChannels

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

February 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.