Google Cloud Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Google and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Ping Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 8.6% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Ping Identity’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Identity

Read 26 Google Cloud Identity reviews

6,178 Views
5,375 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

8,272 Views
2,730 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Identity

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Google Cloud Identity are competing products in identity management. Google Cloud Identity is perceived as superior due to its comprehensive features, making it a favorable investment.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers robust single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and strong security controls tailored for complex environments. It supports a range of authentication methods and allows extensive customization. Google Cloud Identity provides seamless integration with Google services, ease of use, and advanced security features suitable for cloud-based ecosystems. Its capabilities include multifactor authentication, group access management, and integration with Google Workspace.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could benefit from enhanced integration options with non-standard applications and simplification of its user interface. It might also improve support documentation for new users. Google Cloud Identity may improve by expanding its security features to match the depth of more security-focused solutions, offering more detailed controls for multifactor authentication, and providing better user training resources to ease the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform presents a structured deployment model with dedicated customer support, ensuring a smoother setup process for clients. Google Cloud Identity benefits from its flexible cloud-based deployment model, which enhances scalability and provides integrated support within Google's ecosystem, although it may require a steeper learning curve for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform follows a traditional pricing model with potentially higher upfront costs, emphasizing security and potentially leading to substantial ROI for organizations prioritizing secure identity management. Google Cloud Identity offers competitive pricing, appealing to businesses utilizing Google's services, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced productivity and security features with less focus on individual security configurations compared to Ping Identity Platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Identity

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (11th), Cloud Resource Access Management (5th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (11th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Identity is 8.6%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 3.8%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	3.8%
Google Cloud Identity	8.6%
Other	87.6%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Bhushan Ladkhedkar

Head - Work Transformation at Econz

User lifecycle management becomes streamlined with unified access and context-aware policies

If applications support SAML protocols, integration is always an easy task. However, there are difficulties with form-based applications or LDAP-based applications, particularly traditional applications. We need more flexibility not only with SAML but also with LDAP-based and form-based applications. Context-aware access currently only works with SAML-based applications. If other application integrations could support context-aware access, that would be helpful, as companies are in a transition mode with various traditional, form-based, and LDAP-based applications. Mobile device management could be improved. Through Google Cloud Identity, we can manage Android applications and have control over iOS devices, but container functionality is missing. This is particularly important for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) scenarios, especially in India where the market is now split equally between iOS and Android users. Improvements in this area and integration capabilities would be beneficial.

Read full review

AmitRathod

Senior Analyst at Toll Group

Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys

Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is moderate to difficult to use. I found the approach was practical. Following the steps made it very easy to use."

"Google is always on its own, and Google Cloud Identity is pretty good on every point."

"The main control page and the ability to manage all our users from a web-based portal are the most valuable aspects of the solution. That's particularly useful because we're a heterogeneous network."

"The Cloud Identity is well advanced in terms of features, applications, and the components that it is offering."

"The most beneficial feature for enhancing security is context-aware access."

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Identity is its stability."

"I think the first thing that is great is that it gives you a lot of features, like login, and then vaulted passwords and secure LDAP, and it becomes easier for the end customer to leverage all those features without going to a higher SKU of G Suite."

"The solution is primarily used for single control and single sign which helps with the security and authentication of multiple devices."

More Google Cloud Identity pros

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"Personally, I appreciate Identity Orchestration the most about Ping Identity Platform, as with a simple drag-and-drop interface and the correct options we can build a complex and personalized process very efficiently and effectively for registration, login, and profile management."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"This is a user-friendly solution."

"It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different systems, mainly wireless SIEMS and other analytical systems that we want to introduce."

"The interface could be more user-friendly."

"When referring to the help articles I found them not helpful. Support themselves understood my query but the resolution was not satisfactory."

"Their stock management and remote computer management can be improved."

"To improve the product, the integration with third-party products could always be smoother."

"The solution needs to better integrate with Mac's OS."

"Google Cloud Identity should improve its compatibility with other products without any impact, such as Jamf Cloud."

"Google Cloud Identity the UI could improve."

More Google Cloud Identity cons

"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"The fees are paid monthly and there are no additional costs other than the licensing fees."

"The product is billed on a monthly basis depending on the number of users."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"We probably spend about $50,000 a year on licensing."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

More Google Cloud Identity pricing and cost advice

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also access to both Microsoft’s user community as well as around-the-clock customer s...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Identity?

It's crucial to monitor costs carefully, as there can be unexpected charges. I have been charged even when there was supposed to be free credit.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Identity?

If you are asking about room for improvement with Google Cloud Identity, whatever is there already, cost is the only problem. If you are comparing with GCP, OCI, the cost will be a little bit highe...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingFederate?

PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingFederate?

It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingFederate?

We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 73% of the time

Okta Platform vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 3% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

Microsoft Entra Domain Services vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 1% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity

April 2026

Download Google Cloud Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

April 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

Cloud Identity, Cloud Identity Premium

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Google Cloud Identity provides a robust platform for managing user and group access across cloud resources, enhancing security with multi-factor authentication and unifying identities with seamless single sign-on.

Offering a comprehensive range of features, Google Cloud Identity presents a web-based user management portal, group access control, and context-aware access, which significantly improves security and simplifies application-level policies. Seamless integration with Google Workspace and straightforward setup processes enhance usability, while organizational unit management supports efficient policy handling. This makes cloud-based user management both straightforward and impactful. Areas for enhancement include password management and integration with third-party applications and systems like Mac and Active Directory. The interface could also be more user-friendly, while pricing adjustments could improve competitiveness. Monitoring capabilities require better customization, and mobile device management needs refinement for wider compatibility. Strengthening customer support access and robustness would encourage smoother user experiences.

What are the key features of Google Cloud Identity?

Group Access Control: Enables management of access to resources by defining groups.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across applications through single sign-on.
Unified Identity Access: Provides a single view for identity management.
Endpoint Management: Manages devices accessing cloud resources efficiently.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhances security with additional authentication steps.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Google Cloud Identity?

Enhanced Security: Robust security is provided through multi-factor authentication and context-aware access.
Streamlined Access Management: Simplified user and access management cuts down administrative tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Ease of integration with tools like Google Workspace enhances functionality.
Simplified Policy Management: Intuitive organizational unit management makes handling policies efficient.

Numerous industries implement Google Cloud Identity for its single sign-on and access management capabilities, which enable fine-tuned cloud resource control, multi-device authentication, and effective user administration. By integrating with systems for user authentication and identity synchronization from Active Directory, companies utilize it for enhanced collaboration and mobile device management. A unified account experience augments security with multi-factor authentication, applicable across platforms without necessitating Google Workspace.

Google

Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.

This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.

What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?

Cloud Capabilities: Built for cloud applications with flexible integrations.
Federated Identity Management: Allows easy integration of multiple IDPs.
SSO and MFA Support: Ensure secure and seamless access.
Passwordless Authentication: Enhances user convenience.
API and Device Management: Protects and secures devices and APIs.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Ping Identity Platform?

Enhanced Security: Through detailed compliance features and multi-protocol support.
User Convenience: Enabled by passwordless access and integration flexibility.
Improved Access Control: With role-based permissions and identity management integration.
Seamless Integration: Across a range of identity providers and authentication protocols.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

ExtraHop Networks, HealthChannels

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.