Google Cloud Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Google and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Google is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8, while Ping Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Google holds a 9.2% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Ping Identity’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Identity

Read 26 Google Cloud Identity reviews

7,803 Views
6,867 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 32 Ping Identity Platform reviews

9,533 Views
3,051 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Identity

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Google Cloud Identity are competing products in identity management. Google Cloud Identity is perceived as superior due to its comprehensive features, making it a favorable investment.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers robust single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and strong security controls tailored for complex environments. It supports a range of authentication methods and allows extensive customization. Google Cloud Identity provides seamless integration with Google services, ease of use, and advanced security features suitable for cloud-based ecosystems. Its capabilities include multifactor authentication, group access management, and integration with Google Workspace.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could benefit from enhanced integration options with non-standard applications and simplification of its user interface. It might also improve support documentation for new users. Google Cloud Identity may improve by expanding its security features to match the depth of more security-focused solutions, offering more detailed controls for multifactor authentication, and providing better user training resources to ease the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform presents a structured deployment model with dedicated customer support, ensuring a smoother setup process for clients. Google Cloud Identity benefits from its flexible cloud-based deployment model, which enhances scalability and provides integrated support within Google's ecosystem, although it may require a steeper learning curve for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform follows a traditional pricing model with potentially higher upfront costs, emphasizing security and potentially leading to substantial ROI for organizations prioritizing secure identity management. Google Cloud Identity offers competitive pricing, appealing to businesses utilizing Google's services, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced productivity and security features with less focus on individual security configurations compared to Ping Identity Platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 907,664 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Identity

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (12th), Cloud Resource Access Management (6th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Authentication Systems (6th), Data Governance (10th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Identity is 9.2%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 3.6%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	3.6%
Google Cloud Identity	9.2%
Other	87.2%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Sony Kurian

Director at GNX Solutions

Cloud automation has improved development efficiency and supports secure MFA and SSO

The best features in Google Cloud Identity are their cloud, their VMs, and their cloud VMs, which are too good compared to OCI. Using Google Cloud Identity is beneficial in terms of finance as we are always doing automation and AI, and it is definitely the best. I use multi-factor authentication with Google Cloud Identity. Regarding how Google Cloud Identity helps to improve security, I can say that security is something everyone is using. I do not feel any different. After this, everything will be JWT token and all things we are using. I do not feel any difference in there. I have used the SSO feature, single sign-on, with Google Cloud Identity. In a few words, how Google Cloud Identity affected user management within my organization is that it is not done for my organization but for one of my clients only. I already have the ADs there, but still, it is the best. I think the reporting tools of Google Cloud Identity are good. I cannot comment on these kinds of things for this particular product.

Read full review

AmitRathod

Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited

Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys

Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Cloud Identity is well advanced in terms of features, applications, and the components that it is offering."

"It's easy to set up."

"One of the most useful features was the single sign-on. You can use it as an identity provider or service provider. And you can use their organization unit feature to enable or disable some of the features for a specific group of users."

"The most beneficial feature for enhancing security is context-aware access."

"Following the steps made it very easy to use."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Google Cloud Identity uses what they call organizational units (OUs) instead of the security groups you'd find in Microsoft's Entra."

"The main control page and the ability to manage all our users from a web-based portal are the most valuable aspects of the solution. That's particularly useful because we're a heterogeneous network."

More Google Cloud Identity pros

"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"It's pretty stable as a product."

"We use the product to run different reports."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The interface could be more user-friendly."

"For Google Cloud Identity, there will be a recurring cost. There is no ROI."

"Google Cloud Identity the UI could improve."

"The integration should be made easier."

"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different systems, mainly wireless SIEMS and other analytical systems that we want to introduce."

"There is room for improvement in the configuration of their security policies. It seems quite basic."

"The interface could be improved by simplifying it further."

"Google Cloud Identify could make the technology used easier to understand as a layman making it more user-friendly."

More Google Cloud Identity cons

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

"Many times when we are authenticating, we'd like the freedom to set the time; maybe it needs to be slightly longer, and before we can authenticate it, it ends up in an error and then we have to create everything all over again in terms of launching the application."

"In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"The product is billed on a monthly basis depending on the number of users."

"When I worked on Cloud Identity, they offered a free or enterprise version. You can synchronize and create up to 100 user identities in the free version. After that, you have to purchase a business or enterprise license. In that model, you'll be charged based on the number of users."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The fees are paid monthly and there are no additional costs other than the licensing fees."

More Google Cloud Identity pricing and cost advice

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The product is costly."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also access to both Microsoft’s user community as well as around-the-clock customer s...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Identity?

It's crucial to monitor costs carefully, as there can be unexpected charges. I have been charged even when there was supposed to be free credit.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Identity?

If you are asking about room for improvement with Google Cloud Identity, whatever is there already, cost is the only problem. If you are comparing with GCP, OCI, the cost will be a little bit highe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?

Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingAccess?

The areas where I think PingFederate needs room for improvement include that the most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the applicati...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingAccess?

The main use case for PingFederate is that we are maintaining the centralized single sign-on with DuroSengel and Carabras as the two main instances to review. If any application is hosted outside o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 79% of the time

Okta Platform vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 3% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

Microsoft Entra Domain Services vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 1% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity

July 2026

Download Google Cloud Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

July 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

Cloud Identity, Cloud Identity Premium

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Google Cloud Identity provides a robust platform for managing user and group access across cloud resources, enhancing security with multi-factor authentication and unifying identities with seamless single sign-on.

Offering a comprehensive range of features, Google Cloud Identity presents a web-based user management portal, group access control, and context-aware access, which significantly improves security and simplifies application-level policies. Seamless integration with Google Workspace and straightforward setup processes enhance usability, while organizational unit management supports efficient policy handling. This makes cloud-based user management both straightforward and impactful. Areas for enhancement include password management and integration with third-party applications and systems like Mac and Active Directory. The interface could also be more user-friendly, while pricing adjustments could improve competitiveness. Monitoring capabilities require better customization, and mobile device management needs refinement for wider compatibility. Strengthening customer support access and robustness would encourage smoother user experiences.

What are the key features of Google Cloud Identity?

Group Access Control: Enables management of access to resources by defining groups.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across applications through single sign-on.
Unified Identity Access: Provides a single view for identity management.
Endpoint Management: Manages devices accessing cloud resources efficiently.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhances security with additional authentication steps.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Google Cloud Identity?

Enhanced Security: Robust security is provided through multi-factor authentication and context-aware access.
Streamlined Access Management: Simplified user and access management cuts down administrative tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Ease of integration with tools like Google Workspace enhances functionality.
Simplified Policy Management: Intuitive organizational unit management makes handling policies efficient.

Numerous industries implement Google Cloud Identity for its single sign-on and access management capabilities, which enable fine-tuned cloud resource control, multi-device authentication, and effective user administration. By integrating with systems for user authentication and identity synchronization from Active Directory, companies utilize it for enhanced collaboration and mobile device management. A unified account experience augments security with multi-factor authentication, applicable across platforms without necessitating Google Workspace.

Google

Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.

This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.

What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?

Cloud Capabilities: Built for cloud applications with flexible integrations.
Federated Identity Management: Allows easy integration of multiple IDPs.
SSO and MFA Support: Ensure secure and seamless access.
Passwordless Authentication: Enhances user convenience.
API and Device Management: Protects and secures devices and APIs.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Ping Identity Platform?

Enhanced Security: Through detailed compliance features and multi-protocol support.
User Convenience: Enabled by passwordless access and integration flexibility.
Improved Access Control: With role-based permissions and identity management integration.
Seamless Integration: Across a range of identity providers and authentication protocols.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

ExtraHop Networks, HealthChannels

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

June 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.