Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Oracle Cloud Object Storage | 3.9% |
| Amazon S3 | 14.1% |
| Amazon S3 Glacier | 13.8% |
| Other | 68.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 59 |
Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.
Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements
Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.
Brinks
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture | 3.5 | We use Oracle Cloud Object Storage primarily for large-scale applications in the cloud, valuing its high availability and stability with large datasets. However, its usability could improve, especially in real-time operations, and technical support is often slow. |
| Cloud Specialist at a legal firm with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I have used Oracle Cloud Object Storage for storing unstructured data and deploying core banking solutions. It offers multi-region support and scalability, but lacks a load balancer similar to Azure and AWS. It's more secure than other providers. |
| DBA Competency Manager at 4iApps | 4.0 | I find Oracle Cloud Object Storage cost-effective and reliable for backups, though usability and data retrieval could be simpler. It's stable, highly scalable, and well-supported, but setup and interface improvements would enhance the overall experience. |
| IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I have been using Oracle Cloud Object Storage with the E-Business Suite for around five years, appreciating its manageability, scalability, and security. Despite previously using Amazon for different purposes, I find Oracle's lifecycle management particularly helpful and rate it nine out of ten. |
| President at Asvesot C.A. | 5.0 | I use JBoss on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure for multiple services due to its good performance, cost-efficiency, security features, and ease of use, and I’m satisfied with the support, continuous feature updates, and overall platform stability. |
| Oracle Technology Artchitect and Specialist at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | No summary available |
| IT Infrastructure Manager at Lojas Renner SA | 4.5 | I found Oracle Cloud Object Storage performance good, though improvements and better integration with other platforms would help. Its affordability and compatibility with our Oracle-based systems led us to switch from Azure, despite Azure's superior integration with Microsoft tools. |
| Solution Sales - Oracle Technologies at Lgicalis GmbH | 4.0 | I use Oracle Cloud Object Storage for backup continuity due to Germany's legal data retention requirements. Its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity are valuable, though improvements like better customization and manual task options are needed. Subscription cancellation can complicate deletion. |
