Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. Google holds a 10.6% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Read 10 Google Cloud Storage Nearline reviews

1,732 Views
1,492 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Read 6 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews

956 Views
856 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage Nearline and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are well-regarded cloud storage solutions. According to user reviews, Oracle Cloud Object Storage may have the upper hand in features and providing value for money.

Features: Google Cloud Storage Nearline features seamless integration with Google Cloud services, fast data retrieval, and strong security. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers comprehensive management tools, scalability, and robust performance, which give it a slight edge.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage Nearline users suggest better documentation and more intuitive data migration tools as areas for improvement. Oracle Cloud Object Storage requires enhancements in customer support and pricing transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage Nearline is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive support. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has a flexible deployment model but receives mixed reviews for customer service reliability.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage Nearline is praised for its competitive pricing and strong ROI. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, despite its higher price, is considered to provide strong ROI through advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is 10.6%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

AmitKumar36

Solution Architect at HCL Technologies

Flexible, seamless, and scalable document storage with AI and analytics integration, providing reliable support

The solution is very flexible in terms of scalability. It is an online service, so we can scale it anytime with some pre-planning. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. As for the users using this solution in our organization, that varies according to what time of the day and what day it is, but it goes around 2,000 to 3,000 users. The maximum is about 3,000. On average, it stays somewhere between 2,000 and 1,800.

Read full review

PriyankShrivastava

Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture

A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement

There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best part of Nearline storage is the ability to take backups at optimal costs and its availability across multiple regions."

"The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good."

"Nearline is highly stable."

"The most valuable aspect of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is its integration with the wider Google Cloud ecosystem."

"Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."

"It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files."

"I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution."

"The most valuable aspect of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is its integration with the wider Google Cloud ecosystem."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline pros

"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."

"It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

"The technical support for the solution was very nice."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valuable for storing unstructured data, such as text documents and word documents."

"We use it mostly in the cloud. It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

Cons

"The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud."

"One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly."

"They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files."

"Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools."

"The UI could be a little bit more effective."

"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing."

"From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline cons

"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."

"The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced."

"Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day."

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."

"I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

"The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."

"Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."

"We have a yearly subscription for the product."

"During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month."

"Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

The storage and access cost of Nearline are considered optimal compared to other cloud storage solutions, although I lack a clear view of other cloud storage costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

It is an expensive product. We do not use a monthly plan; instead, we opt for a quarterly or semi-annual licensing model, which we negotiate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 97% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 46% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 11% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

April 2025

Download Google Cloud Storage Nearline product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

March 2025

Download Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report

Overview

A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

Google

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Brinks

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.