We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."This solution supports all file formats."
"First of all, the solution is very secure. Secondly, the solution is very fast. It is reliable and available all the time."
"It is very easy to use SSTP and some traditional code to move the data into a database because we can easily use the permissions and we don't have any integration or conversion issues."
"Azure File Storage gives good value for money, so I don't find it expensive."
"Very user-friendly and intuitive."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place."
"It was easy to set up."
"The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."
"Some of the procedures are a bit more complex in Azure than in other providers."
"The product’s pricing could be better."
"The product must provide better security functions."
"They should make the solution more user-friendly."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"I have had issues migrating my data to another subscription."
"It's not very intuitive."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 43 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Amazon S3 Glacier, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and Google Cloud Storage.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
