Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers easy global file sharing and cost savings, though ROI impact varies for medium businesses.
Sentiment score
5.1
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valued for secure backups and ROI, with high ratings despite minimal financial impact.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
Microsoft Azure File Storage customer service varies in response time, with premium contracts offering better efficiency and support.
Sentiment score
4.6
Oracle Cloud Object Storage receives mixed reviews for support, with praise for response time but criticism for expertise and delays.
Microsoft technical support is very prompt.
The perspective documentation is good.
As and when we require, they are able to provide solutions or guide us toward solutions.
I have a premium subscription for Oracle Cloud, which ensures a high level of support.
Sometimes, the expertise of those who come on call is not adequate.
Oracle is more cost-effective than competitors.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers exceptional scalability, accommodating diverse business needs with automatic scaling for substantial user bases.
Sentiment score
7.4
Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers scalable, flexible, and easy-to-manage storage solutions with smooth configuration and resource adjustments for varied workloads.
We can adjust the number of CPUs as per our need and reduce the load.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.0
Microsoft Azure File Storage is highly rated for stability and reliability, with minor connectivity issues and minimal disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.2
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is highly stable and reliable, consistently meeting user expectations with satisfactory performance ratings.
I rate the stability of Microsoft Azure File Storage as a seven out of ten.
We sometimes encounter glitches with bigger files, but everything else works as expected.
The system is stable, especially when set up in a single region.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure File Storage needs cost transparency, better support, performance, security, usability, and improved integration and management features.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs better security, customization, integration, and usability, with improved billing, support, and load balancing.
Expanding the storage capacity would be beneficial.
Some chunking logics need to be better to address issues with processing bigger files.
The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed.
I am also interested in learning about the Oracle Cloud Storage data durability and high availability features of the product.
I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing is moderate, flexible, and usage-based, but transparency and competitiveness could be improved.
Oracle Cloud Storage offers flexible pricing options with perceived security benefits, though some users find it expensive.
I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.
The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud is comparable to other cloud providers.
It is an expensive product.
We have to pay the price, and the cost is higher.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure File Storage provides scalable, secure cloud storage with seamless Azure integration, supporting multiple file formats and Active Directory.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valued for scalability, security, ease of use, multi-region support, and managing large datasets.
The storage solution saves time and makes document processing seamless.
It is satisfying our requirements with encryption and security features in place.
In Microsoft Azure File Storage, the S3 bucket is the most helpful feature for my use.
I find manageability, scalability, and security of the product most valuable.
High availability, a large dataset, and stability are our main criteria for using this solution.
It also provides multi-region support, enhancing data accessibility and safety.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
11th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 9.8%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 3.8%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration
We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…
PriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewer
A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement
There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.
What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.
What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
I am inquiring about the lifecycle management capabilities of Oracle Cloud Object Storage and want to know if it is useful and helps to optimize processes. Additionally, I would like to know about ...
 

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden
Brinks
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.