Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Meraki SD-WAN Logo

Meraki SD-WAN Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

What is Meraki SD-WAN?

Featured Meraki SD-WAN reviews

Meraki SD-WAN mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Meraki SD-WAN in the Software Defined Networking (SDN) category stands at 21.6%, down from 24.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined Networking (SDN) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Meraki SD-WAN21.6%
Cisco ACI13.8%
Omada Cloud SDN11.2%
Other53.39999999999999%
Software Defined Networking (SDN)

PeerResearch reports based on Meraki SD-WAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySoftware Defined Networking (SDN)Aug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonMeraki SD-WAN vs Cisco ACIAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonMeraki SD-WAN vs AviatrixAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Cisco ACI4.013.8%85%102 interviewsAdd to research
Cradlepoint NetCloud3.54.4%50%4 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business177
Midsize Enterprise91
Large Enterprise336
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Retailer
5%
Government
5%
Construction Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
University
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Non Profit
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Media Company
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
 
Meraki SD-WAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Solution Architect at airtel4.0Managing Meraki SD-WAN with a lean IT team is efficient due to its visibility and manageability. Its features like app orchestration and switch management are valuable, though security features could improve by integrating AI and offering bundled licenses. Overall, ROI is achieved.
NOC Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I find Meraki SD-WAN stable and user-friendly with a helpful GUI for basic setups. Its real-time analytics are excellent, though I wish for more troubleshooting features. Meraki competes well with VeloCloud and others, and I use AWS for deployment.
Product Manager at Uop Ipl3.5No summary available
Senior Network Administrator at RS&H4.0We use Meraki SD-WAN in a multi-location business for its reliable dual circuits and central administration. While it lacks some advanced features compared to Cisco's higher-end solutions, it simplifies deployment and management compared to our previous Versa SD WAN.
Director Of Information Technology at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees5.0Meraki SD-WAN automates bandwidth and VPN management, making it ideal for setups requiring minimal maintenance staff. While it fits our needs, those seeking higher bandwidth may consider alternatives like Palo Alto or Fortinet for better capacity.
Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy4.0I use Meraki SD-WAN for firewall functions, mainly Cisco Meraki MX, valuing its auto-VPN feature for branch connectivity. Although improvements in traffic shaping and routing are needed, it aids cost savings. Competitors include Fortinet and Versa.
GM of Vietnam, EBG at RuijieNetworks4.0No summary available
Project Manager at Wipro Limited5.0I use Meraki SD-WAN for technical checks due to its ease of maintenance and cost-effectiveness. While it surpasses MPLS performance, it needs improvements in network performance and cost. Previously, I used independent Cisco routers and switches.