We performed a comparison between Cisco ACI and Meraki SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Micro-segmentation is the solution’s most valuable feature."
"It is a complete re-write of everything that you've ever thought of from a networking standpoint."
"It is very easy to do the configuration after you know how to work with the product. It is global, so you change one interface, and changes are reflected on every switch."
"The biggest benefit has been that it has improved communication between my endpoints in the data center."
"The straightforward migration of all of the applications and loop balancing are the two most valuable features. Also, the measurement of their customer-wide sources is very straightforward. It's another dimension of the networks."
"Centralized management and control of the entire data center environment and its architecture."
"It offers multitenancy. The opportunity to install it on the same platform with a huge amount of customers."
"The flexibility of adding new components with minimal impact on existing services running in the data center is a key benefit of this ACI-based solution."
"Meraki SD-WAN is user friendly."
"The most interesting feature is the amount of information you can get from overseeing the system from a centralized place."
"The most valuable feature is application awareness."
"Meraki SD-WAN is a scalable solution because changes are being made to the solution, enabling it to work in different environments."
"This product contributed to a huge benefit in our bottom line on operational costs."
"What I found most valuable in Meraki SD-WAN is its simplicity. I also like its manageability."
"The most valuable feature of Meraki SD-WAN is the Auto VPN."
"Using Meraki just solves a lot of problems."
"It would be great if ACI would include the next generation firewall feature."
"They should improve the GUI, make it simpler. They also need to improve its integration with other automation tools."
"We have had two calls with technical support. They are not the best. We opened a case to diagnose issues and it's taken weeks to get someone on the case and to move forward."
"Training for this product is available from institutions but it is not available online where you can get users trained easily."
"The way the objects are oriented on it are not as straightforward as they should be."
"The tool's initial deployment is complex and takes five hours to complete."
"From my point of view, troubleshooting issues relating to ACI can be a little bit complicated to perform."
"Compared to VMware, it needs more virtualization technologies."
"The deployment time of Meraki SD-WAN can vary. For someone new to the process, it could take a couple of hours. However, for someone with hands-on experience, such as myself, it only takes approximately two to three hours to set up the entire configuration."
"Meraki is more or less intelligent load balancing, although a lot of features are missing that our SD-WAN solutions will have."
"The blocklist on the Cisco Meraki side isn't complete or very large. We'd like to see them update and expand this."
"The granularity could be improved."
"The interface in the VPN management system can be a bit complex for users to understand."
"The security could improve in Meraki SD-WAN."
"From the vice perspective, they just are not as robust as some of the other vendors. They have limitations in throughput and the number of circuits that they can support on a wide area network. Their higher-end security is all cloud-based. They have some capability with the premise-based solutions, but the higher ends are all cloud-based, and that's via Cisco Umbrella."
"The only area for improvement in Meraki SD-WAN is its licensing model, as well as its cost structure."
Cisco ACI is ranked 2nd in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 96 reviews while Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 60 reviews. Cisco ACI is rated 8.0, while Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ACI writes "Stable, easy to extend, scalable, and has a host-based routing feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Very stable security, great service, and the best for VPN management". Cisco ACI is most compared with VMware NSX, Cisco Secure Workload, Nuage Networks, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Cumulus Networks, whereas Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Omada Cloud SDN, Cradlepoint NetCloud and Megaport. See our Cisco ACI vs. Meraki SD-WAN report.
See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
