Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Mend.io?

Get the report
Helped 866,286 peers since 2012

Featured Mend.io reviews

Mend.io mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Mend.io in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category stands at 7.9%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Mend.io7.9%
Black Duck17.8%
Snyk13.7%
Other60.599999999999994%
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

PeerResearch reports based on Mend.io reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySoftware Composition Analysis (SCA)Aug 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonMend.io vs Black DuckAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonMend.io vs SnykAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonMend.io vs VeracodeAug 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)4.0N/A81%116 interviewsAdd to research
GitLab4.24.1%97%85 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business417
Midsize Enterprise283
Large Enterprise1406
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Government
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
University
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Construction Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Mend.io with alternative products

Learn more about Mend.io

Mend.io customers

Related questions

 
Mend.io Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5We use Mend.io with our CI/CD tools like Concourse and Jenkins for managing dependencies and detecting vulnerabilities across multiple languages. While the tool is low-cost and effective, we considered consolidating tools with Snyk for broader functionality.
Principal Architect at a consultancy with 11-50 employees4.5I work with Mend.io in industries like retail and hospitality. It's a security tool offering feedback on tests and supports Application Security, SCA, SAST, and container scanning. The main challenge is cost and integration in early software development stages.
Product Security Architect at Pitney Bowes Inc.5.0I use Mend.io to identify open-source library vulnerabilities and licensing issues. Its notification feature for critical vulnerabilities is valuable. I'd like a compliance pack for frameworks like CIS or NIST. The ROI is evident in enhanced security.
Release Manager at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees4.5We use Mend.io to efficiently detect and fix vulnerabilities in our products, benefiting from its ease of setup and numerous integrations. Improvements are needed in reporting features and UI, but overall, it provides significant time and resource savings.
Principal Security Engineer at Texthelp Ltd.4.0Mend is a seamless SaaS solution for managing open-source libraries and vulnerabilities, integrating well with our developer tools like Visual Studio and Azure. While effective, improvements could include preconfigured policies and a cleaner dashboard. It offers reliable security with no breaches.
Sr. Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit4.5No summary available
Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University4.5No summary available