Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Docker vs Mend.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.0
Docker boosts ROI by reducing time, staffing, and costs, while improving efficiency, productivity, and simplifying deployment and collaboration.
Sentiment score
6.7
Mend.io enhances ROI by automating security, improving efficiency, and integrating seamlessly into workflows, saving time and costs.
I can do containerization and share it with every computer, making it work for everyone.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.2
Docker provides strong support with thorough documentation, community resources, and additional SLA features for paid users.
Sentiment score
6.6
Mend.io customer service is proactive and responsive, praised for timely solutions, technical expertise, and efficient issue resolution.
From what I gather, customer support is great; they are quick and always available to support or help.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I have noticed that the speed to respond has decreased over time.
VP at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Mend.io provides pretty good support.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Docker provides scalable container management with Kubernetes, suitable for cloud environments, though needing automation improvements for broader efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.5
Mend.io scales seamlessly with organizational growth, integrating into workflows and DevOps tools, enhancing security and collaboration effortlessly.
Previously, only one or two applications could run on a server, but now it can handle hundreds of applications, scaling up or down as needed.
Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance
A realistic metric I observe is that I can scale services from two to over 20 containers without code changes.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Docker is favored for its stability and effective container management, despite minor issues like memory and Windows compatibility.
Sentiment score
7.7
Mend.io is stable with occasional slowdowns, recommended on Chrome/Firefox, and improved by ongoing enhancements and updates.
Docker has been very stable in my environment, especially once best practices and proper organization were in place.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
Mend.io is very stable; we did not have any issues.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

Docker requires improved documentation, stability, user interfaces, and performance, alongside easier cloud integration and better community support.
Mend.io users request better notifications, improved container scanning, clearer documentation, enhanced UI, flexible pricing, and reduced false positives.
Docker is a time-tested, proven solution with industry-wide applications.
Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance
Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
That's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I strongly recommend that they start working with AI for the reporting part.
VP at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
The actual challenge is how easy it is to integrate it in the early phase of the software development life cycle.
Principal Architect at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Docker offers scalable open-source and enterprise options with flexible pricing, starting at $5 per user, impacting overall costs.
Mend.io's pricing is seen as affordable and clear, yet varies by developer count, posing challenges for startups.
Docker Desktop is free for individual developers and small teams, but a paid subscription is required for large enterprises.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Docker offers secure, flexible, and easy containerization with fast deployment, automation, cost savings, and seamless integration across platforms.
Mend.io provides comprehensive vulnerability detection, license management, and integration tools to enhance security and decision-making practices effectively.
Good security capabilities are included as well, providing image scanning, non-root containers, and minimal base images that reduce the attack surface.
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
It allows the software to run on various machines without compatibility issues, saving a lot of time.
Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance
The most valuable feature is the simple containerization.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Mend.io is very efficient, highly efficient, and it is the best scanning tool for SCA.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Mend.io's reporting tools are beneficial for my use case; from a UI perspective and generation of reports, including the SBOM, it has the flexibility and is easy to generate and share with the developer teams.
VP at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Docker
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Development Platforms (1st), Container Management (4th), AI Software Development (7th)
Mend.io
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (18th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Static Code Analysis (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Docker is 5.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mend.io is 10.8%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Mend.io10.8%
Docker5.0%
Other84.2%
Software Supply Chain Security
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2787357 - PeerSpot reviewer
Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.
Containerization has standardized deployments and drives faster, more reliable delivery
As Docker is already a very mature tool, there are areas where it can be improved based on real-world usage. One area I consider is the Windows container experience. The pain point here is that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers because I have worked in both environments and felt that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers. This also limits the ecosystem and tooling maturity compared to Linux containers. Improvements could include performance optimization and better parity with Linux container features. Apart from that, observability and debugging is another area. The pain point is the limited native metrics available and limited logging and tracing features. Improvements could include adding a good amount of metrics, logging, and tracing, as well as better built-in observability features and easier container introspection. Network complexity is also present. I face issues with Docker networking that can become confusing in complex setups, and debugging container-to-container issues is not always intuitive. Improvements can be made with simpler networking abstractions and better built-in troubleshooting tools. Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability. These points should be kept in mind and worked on.
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized security monitoring has reduced false positives and improves dependency governance
The only area for improvement I would say is that the false positives are nearly zero; everything is mostly like 99 to 99.99% or we can say 100% accurate. There were a few areas for improvement just from the last time I saw; I think the user experience had a little problem. We wanted to have certain reports based on our kind of scenario, but the tool did not allow us to create custom reports. We had asked for some facility and some ability for us to create some custom reports. That would be awesome if they allow us to create custom reports the way we wanted. There is one small area which I don't know whether we should call a tool limitation or a wish list; if I use a library and I don't use all the capabilities of the library but only a portion of it and that portion is not vulnerable, but there is a component which is outdated, that is a problem, even though I don't use that component. Mend.io will discover there is a problem in the whole library; that is correct. That's a valid discovery, but in my case, for example, if I don't use that particular portion, then it actually is not making sense for me, but that's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise35
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?
We are using Docker to host applications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?
Regarding the cost, Mirantis Container Cloud is cheaper than other solutions like Red Hat. The license costs around 10,000 Indian rupees per year.
What needs improvement with Docker?
Mirantis Container Cloud should have AI integration tools, which are not available right now. These tools should assist in app scalability and deployment error handling.
How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?
We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mend.io?
Mend.io SCA offers a competitive pricing structure that is relatively affordable compared to similar solutions in the market. This makes it an attractive option for organizations looking to enhance...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates
Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Mend.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.