ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance management (APM) solution that is designed to give users deep insights into both the way that their applications perform and the way that users of those applications experience them. Organizations can use this solution to identify areas where their critical applications are lacking and address them before there are any negative repercussions. ManageEngine Applications Manager is the kind of tool that companies of all sizes can use to keep their applications running in the best way possible.
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability | Jul 24, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jul 24, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ManageEngine Applications Manager vs Datadog | Jul 24, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ManageEngine Applications Manager vs Dynatrace | Jul 24, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ManageEngine Applications Manager vs Splunk AppDynamics | Jul 24, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veeam Data Platform | 4.3 | N/A | 94% | 425 interviewsAdd to research |
| Dynatrace | 4.4 | 10.2% | 95% | 348 interviewsAdd to research |
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers yearly licensing costs. The pricing is considered reasonable and more affordable compared to other solutions in the market. The standard license covers most features, but there are also paid add-ons available. The annual licensing cost depends on the number of monitors connected, with the price reflecting once it reaches two hundred monitors.
ManageEngine Applications Manager Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying ManageEngine Applications Manager include:
ManageEngine Applications Manager Features
Some of the many useful features ManageEngine Applications Manager has to offer include:
Reviews from Real Users
ManageEngine Applications Manager is a solution that stands out when it is compared to many of its competitors. It is part of a complete suite of management tools that users can take advantage of. The way that ManageEngine Applications Manager keeps up to date with a regular schedule of software updates enables organizations to manage their applications without worrying that they are missing any important capabilities or features. If any feature is absent, users can integrate the solution with other monitoring solutions. ManageEngine Applications Manager regularly undergoes updates that ensure that users have access to all of the latest features and patches.
Rodrigo T., the CEO of AXIOVISTA spa, writes, “This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature.”
Syed A., the enterprise senior account manager of sales at a tech services company, writes, “Our customers appreciate that ManageEngine sends regular updates, upgrading their software several times a year.”
ManageEngine Applications Manager was previously known as Applications Manager.
Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity
I am a user as well as a functional person who understands the process, suggests flows, and asks ManageEngine some announcement queries. I internally guided the team through the asset module, problem module, incident module, and change module implementations. That is something I did the last year.
I used it extensively for a year, and prior to that, I was very comfortable.
The main issue with ManageEngine is that it only functions as a record-keeping system, it has never had an IT framework in place.
The necessary flows, KPIs, and SLAs are not easily configurable. It's not an apple-to-apple comparison, but most people are familiar with Remedy, ServiceNow, Azure, or Azure IT ticketing tools, as well as low-code and no-code. The flexibility available versus ManageEngine's system of record is killing rather than helping.
That is the main area of concern.
When ManageEngine releases new or upcoming updates, the usability features or the bare minimum MVP are not taken into account. Some of the fundamentals are seriously lacking in ManageEngine in IT.
None of the solutions meet our expectations. Each solution is half-hearted. Each solution is not well integrated. That is the reality.
The problem is that implementation requires a significant amount of mapping effort. For example, if it is a monitoring system, there should be immediate code operations or immediate server statistics linkage to that server statistics to the thresholds, and the threshold to peak should be too low. The mapping required a significant amount of effort to implement.
In my previous organization, I spent the previous 12 months working with ManageEngine Applications Manager. The implementation of this solution was mandated by my organization.
I used it for one year extensively.
ManageEngine Applications Manager is not stable at all.
Although I have not attempted to scale it, we can increase the number of users. Scalability is limited in terms of functionality, but it is possible in terms of handling users.
We contacted technical support, but the problem is that they acknowledge it, but they always say that this will be part of our next release, which is a product release, or a version release. As a result, it is fundamentally useless to us until it is incorporated into the next version.
I implemented a couple of ServiceNow implementations as a delivery manager. As a result, their ease of understanding, user-friendliness, and dashboarding provides a very comfortable view and comfortable customer satisfaction.
In ManageEngine, we must perform many more queries. We have to create a chart, but those charts are only available as bar charts or pie charts. Fundamentally there are limitations.
I was fortunate to have worked as both an implementer and a user on both of these ticketing tools.
I don't recall, it's been a long time since I raised invoices, and I don't remember the cost.
If I go with ServiceNow and if I go with ManageEngine, I'm willing to pay more if there is a feature that ServiceNow has. We do not have pricing constraints as an organization, because we do have reservations about ManageEngine being functionally scalable.
They have a business relationship with ManageEngine as well as a partnership.
I would rate ManageEngine Applications Manager a four out of ten.
