| Assistant Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | Rating IBM MDM 8/10, I value its matching engine and data model, plus good stability. However, it's difficult for users and developers, setup is hard, and support is poor. It needs to be simpler. |
| Solutions Architecture at Felidaen | 4.0 | I used IBM InfoSphere MDM to maintain a master data record for updated user information, benefiting from strong support. While its UI and on-prem configuration need improvement, I found it more challenging than Informatica but manageable with the right help. |
| Enterprise Architect at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I rate IBM InfoSphere MDM an 8/10. It's stable, scalable, and well-integrated, perfect for large organizations with complex data needs. However, its complexity and cost make it unsuitable for smaller users. |
| Senior Manager Data Architecture at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've used the solution for ten years and value its governance, profiling, and ETL. However, its MDM, RDM, and cloud integration need improvement, leading me to consider building an internal solution. |
| Technical Specialist II at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I've used this for seven years. It's valuable for AML and data matching, despite a non-straightforward setup and high cost. Customer service is good, but it needs a better database. Plan carefully. |
| Senior Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I found name standardization valuable for streamlining processes, but batch-oriented recognition and complex architecture were drawbacks. Scalability was sometimes an issue, and IBM's customer service needed better internal coordination. |
| MDM Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I highly recommend this MDM solution. It's excellent for creating a gold customer database, offers good customer service, and is easy to deploy, despite a past need for probabilistic search API customization. |
| Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees | 2.5 | I found this solution complex to set up due to poor documentation and support. It has deployment and scalability issues, and the implementation team was still learning, despite its flexibility and web services. |
