Ataccama ONE Platform vs IBM InfoSphere MDM comparison

Ataccama and IBM are both solutions in the Master Data Management (MDM) Software category. Ataccama is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Ataccama holds a 4.5% mindshare in MDM, compared to IBM’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 10 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

2,497 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere MDM

Read 9 IBM InfoSphere MDM reviews

1,182 Views
366 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

IBM InfoSphere MDM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2025

IBM InfoSphere MDM and Ataccama ONE Platform compete in the master data management space. Ataccama ONE Platform seems to have the upper hand due to its AI-driven data management and comprehensive features, justifying its premium cost.

Features: IBM InfoSphere MDM offers robust data governance, extensive data integration, and a reliable matching engine. Ataccama ONE Platform includes AI-enhanced data quality, unified data management, and segmentation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM InfoSphere MDM could improve its user interface, reduce complexity in deployment, and enhance integration with newer technologies. Ataccama ONE Platform may benefit from streamlining its cost, providing better documentation, and improving customer support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM InfoSphere MDM offers a traditional deployment model with solid support, whereas Ataccama ONE Platform provides flexibility through hybrid deployment options and quick implementation, offering an edge in deployment efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere MDM has a competitive setup cost and offers good ROI over time. Ataccama ONE Platform requires a higher initial investment but provides robust ROI due to enhanced data processing and management efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere MDM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere MDM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (2nd), Data Governance (11th)

IBM InfoSphere MDM

Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Master Data Management (MDM) Software category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 4.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM InfoSphere MDM is 8.0%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Master Data Management (MDM) Software

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

SoumikDolui

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy Services

Provides inbuilt data model and good matching engine

It's a tough tool for developers. Right now in the market, I think Informatica MDM is number one and is used a lot. IBM MDM was developed by some other company and IBM developed it more. There are definitely some flaws. The tool is difficult to understand from a customer perspective and for developers. Generally, customers can understand Informatica MDM and its functionality easily. If a developer is facing issues with IBM MDM, then a customer will definitely not understand most of the functionality. That is the main concern. IBM is introducing some Next-Gen MDM, where they are using a lot of current technologies and machine learning. Most of the problems we may be facing right now are probably solved in that version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"It is also easy to deploy."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."

"When users update their information on one product, the data is sent to a database. My approach was to maintain a master data record, ensuring that each platform loads the latest updated record. Instead of having three separate records, the system keeps one master data record, storing the historical records for reference."

"The features that are most valuable are the governance, the end-profiling and the ETL which allows you to see the metadata repositories."

"There are not really many areas of the product that need improvement because the product stays up-to-date with data management needs."

"The advantage is that the matching engine is very good, so that's why customers generally prefer it. From the inbuilt data model perspective, IBM MDM is good."

Cons

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"Data movement is a pain."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"We also want better cloud integration, so we could do things in the cloud if we needed to. This would be a good feature to add in a future release."

"The product is really only created for large organizations."

"The tool is difficult to understand from a customer perspective and for developers."

"IBM InfoSphere MDM's UI is complicated. It also needs to improve its on-prem configuration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"It may be costly for small organizations but adds value for large organizations with demanding workflows."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere MDM?

When users update their information on one product, the data is sent to a database. My approach was to maintain a master data record, ensuring that each platform loads the latest updated record. In...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere MDM?

IBM InfoSphere MDM's UI is complicated. It also needs to improve its on-prem configuration.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere MDM?

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM InfoSphere MDM

Compared 45% of the time

SAP Master Data Governance vs IBM InfoSphere MDM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Master Data Management on Cloud vs IBM InfoSphere MDM

Compared 12% of the time

TIBCO EBX vs IBM InfoSphere MDM

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft MDS vs IBM InfoSphere MDM

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere MDM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

August 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Master Data Management (MDM) Software

August 2025

Download IBM InfoSphere MDM product report

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

InfoSphere MDM, InfoSphere Master Data Management

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

InfoSphere Master Data Management (MDM) is the most complete, proven and powerful MDM solution with collaborative and operational capabilities. InfoSphere MDM manages master data for single or multiple domains - customers, patients, citizens, suppliers, locations, products, services offerings, accounts and more - for improving application & business process effectiveness

IBM

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

L'Oreal S.A., Kingland Systems, Oncor, Farmaceuticos Maypo, Volkswagen Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere MDM

July 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere MDM

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere MDM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. IBM InfoSphere MDM report.

See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.

We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.