Google Cloud's operations suite is a comprehensive toolset offering multi-cloud support, insights into performance, uptime, health, and scalable logging for seamless cloud operations.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) | 0.9% |
| Dynatrace | 5.5% |
| Datadog | 4.7% |
| Other | 88.9% |
Google Cloud's operations suite has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to use and doesn't require any additional setup. The monitoring feature is a standout. The cloud logging feature is particularly useful, allowing users to access logs from different platforms and export them for better management. The solution is scalable and stable, with great documentation.
Google Cloud's operations suite could benefit from more automation, specifically in monitoring deployments. Users would like to see the cloud monitoring metrics collection extended to include client-side services. The logging functionality needs improvement with more profiling capabilities, and users would like the ability to analyze charts.
Some users have experienced instability and have had to add additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace. They would like to see improvements in the application log and locker.
Users have reported seeing a return on investment from utilizing Google Cloud's operations suite.
Users have reported that Google Cloud's operations suite is affordable but some suggest the cost could be lower, and express frustration at the lack of transparency in knowing the exact cost before receiving an invoice.
Google Cloud's operations suite, formerly known as Stackdriver, is primarily used for monitoring workloads, cloud logging, application performance management (APM), troubleshooting, and storage of logs. It is used by organizations to monitor all the logs and components involved in performance engineering load tests.
Most customers have not required the assistance of the customer service team. However, many mention that Google's technical support is highly satisfactory.
The initial setup for Google Cloud's operations suite was reported to be easy and straightforward. Enabling API features was all that was required, and the documentation was helpful.
The solution is regarded has highly scalable. Scaling it is said to be straightforward, involving a minimal additional cost.
Google Cloud's operations suite is regarded as stable and reliable, with no reported bugs. However, some users have experienced lagging issues that cannot be resolved.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 90 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 46 |
| Large Enterprise | 157 |
This suite by Google Cloud provides robust features for organizations managing workloads on GCP and AWS. It offers real-time logging and monitoring, aiding in efficient troubleshooting and performance analysis. With automatic monitoring, statistical insights for Kubernetes and VPNs, and the ability to manage logs, it helps in optimizing technology changes and supports risk management. Despite needs for better APM, cost clarity, migration tools, and enhanced documentation, companies benefit from its capabilities in tracking errors and analyzing metrics in execution environments.
What are the key features of Google Cloud's operations suite?Industries utilizing Google Cloud's operations suite find it invaluable for optimizing cloud operations, especially in sectors involving extensive database requests and workload execution. Java and Python teams leverage its logging and alert capabilities for improved error tracking and metrics analysis, crucial for maintaining high-performance standards in tech-driven environments.
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) was previously known as Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring.
Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH | 5.0 | I use Google Cloud's operations suite for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring in our Java and Python projects. While logging is its most valuable feature, early error detection could improve user management. My company is transitioning from another monitoring tool. |
| Automation Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.5 | I use this for performance troubleshooting, valuing its stability, scalability, and logging/tracing. It has reduced troubleshooting time, but I desire better logging functionality and more profiling features. |
| Lead Machine Learning Engineer at Schlumberger | 4.0 | We use this stable, scalable solution for log storage and error metrics because of its strong GCP integration. I wish it had chart analysis like Kibana. I recommend it for GCP users and rate it 8/10. |
| DevOps Data Engineer Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I find Google Cloud's operations suite easy to use for monitoring workloads. It offers automatic monitoring integration, although further automation upon deployment would enhance convenience. Overall, it simplifies monitoring tasks without requiring much intervention or configuration from me. |
| Software Engineer at Formplus | 3.5 | I use Stackdriver for cloud monitoring, logging, and APM. Its cloud logging is very valuable for collecting logs, and setup was easy. While stable and scalable, I'd like more client-side monitoring as current metrics are minimal. |
| Senior Specialist at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech | 4.0 | I use Google Stackdriver for monitoring and like its features. Setup and scalability are straightforward. While generally stable, it could be more so. The current version is much improved, and I rate it an eight out of ten. |
| Infrastructure/Cloud Architect at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I rate Google Stackdriver 8.5/10. Its technical support is excellent, though I wish costs were lower and billing more transparent. I often need to supplement it with other tools and improve application logging. |
| Director, Function Head, RISK Technology and Change at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Stackdriver for GKE log management, valuing its visibility and cost monitoring. While stable, I believe operations documentation and migration tools need improvement. Despite initial setup hiccups, it's good for GCP, so I rate it 8/10. |