Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
F5 Advanced WAF Logo

F5 Advanced WAF Reviews

Vendor: F5
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is F5 Advanced WAF?

Featured F5 Advanced WAF reviews

F5 Advanced WAF mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 8.0%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
F5 Advanced WAF8.0%
Fortinet FortiWeb8.2%
Imperva Application Security Platform7.5%
Other76.3%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerResearch reports based on F5 Advanced WAF reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Dec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonF5 Advanced WAF vs Fortinet FortiWebDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonF5 Advanced WAF vs AWS WAFDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonF5 Advanced WAF vs Imperva Application Security PlatformDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.21.7%98%113 interviewsAdd to research
Imperva Application Security Platform4.37.5%95%133 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 28, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business340
Midsize Enterprise191
Large Enterprise752
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
Retailer
4%
Insurance Company
4%
University
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Media Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Non Profit
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
 
F5 Advanced WAF Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize4.0I've found F5 Advanced WAF to be a reliable, enterprise-grade solution that improves security, stability, and efficiency, especially in high-risk environments, though it requires proper tuning, skilled resources, and upfront investment to deliver its full value.
Project Manager at IBM4.0I've used F5 Advanced WAF for 3–4 years and find its advanced security features effective, though GTM setup is complex and support could improve; overall, it's a solid choice despite higher costs.
Cybersecurity Team Leader at EMAK For Integrated Solutions3.5I've used F5 Advanced WAF for eight years to protect web servers, finding it stable, effective, and feature-rich, though expensive. It reduced attacks significantly, but the high cost and customer support response times could be improved.
Global Channel Alliances Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees5.0I use F5 Advanced WAF for managing enterprise clients, appreciating its subscription-based model for clearer ROI and competitive pricing. However, perpetual licenses lack transparency on support expiry, complicating ROI calculations. Deployment training is expensive and challenging.
Network Security Engineer at IIPL4.0No summary available
Security & Infra Technology Specialist at BARQ Systems5.0No summary available
Senior Network Consultant at Visionet Systems Inc.4.0I use F5 Advanced WAF to protect our remote access VPN and APIs and find its performance smooth and reliable, with effective bot protection and AI features. While support could improve, it offers a good return on investment.
CEO at CyberApp4.0I work with an integration and security company and use F5 Advanced WAF, which effectively combines negative and positive security for application protection. I don't see any current need for improvements and approach F5 directly for specific features.