Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Reviews

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Get the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud and more!
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is the #15 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery Software, #19 ranked solution in top Cloud Backup solutions, and #27 ranked solution in best Backup and Recovery Software. PeerSpot users give AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is most commonly compared to Veeam Data Platform: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data Platform. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
September 2025
Get the report
Helped 867,341 peers since 2012

Featured AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

Read more reviews

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery mindshare

Product category:
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
As of September 2025, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category stands at 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery1.7%
Veeam Data Platform20.8%
Commvault Cloud13.1%
Other64.4%
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

PeerResearch reports based on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryDisaster Recovery (DR) SoftwareSep 13, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto SoftwareSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data PlatformSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Commvault CloudSep 13, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Veeam Data Platform4.320.8%94%429 interviewsAdd to research
Commvault Cloud4.313.1%95%111 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers valuable features like database replication, seamless integration, automated orchestration, and instant block verification. Its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and scalability are highlighted. Users appreciate the native service's stability, reliability, and managed infrastructure, reducing management time. Seamless integration with AWS services like Route 53 enhances disaster recovery. Pay-as-you-go pricing is advantageous when conducting disaster recovery drills, offering flexibility and reducing potential security breaches compared to competitors.
  • "I appreciate the automated orchestration of recovery processes in this solution, especially integration with Route 53 and automatically using Route 53 to switch to a different region directly."
  • "What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."
  • "It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications."

Room for Improvement

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery requires improved automation and enhanced logging for easier diagnostics. Users face difficulties with archival processes and require more intuitive failback functionality. Customer support and UI could be better. Costs are perceived as high, and more AI-driven automation with security features would be beneficial. Reducing failover and failback time, streamlining data replication, and providing comprehensive network configuration tools could enhance overall user satisfaction.
  • "In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."
  • "An improved AWS pricing model is needed."
  • "Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

ROI

Users report a high ROI from AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery. It helps save significant amounts by eliminating the need for hardware purchases as businesses move to the cloud. While upfront costs are lower than building data centers, storage costs can be high for smaller users. The service enhances integration and supports various operating systems. It reduces downtime and data loss, aiding in maintaining company reputation and providing problem-solving capabilities during disasters.

Pricing

Enterprise users generally find AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's pricing to be fair but can accumulate due to multiple costs, including CloudEndure licenses, AWS environment, and storage. Tier 2 pricing offers better value with less frequent replication. Long-term agreements often provide discounts but limit flexibility in adjusting serviceable licenses annually. The solution is perceived as expensive compared to alternatives, with pay-as-you-go models affecting total costs based on usage. Licensing is straightforward, often managed through third-party partners.
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."
  • "CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery primarily for ensuring backup and recovery operations, facilitating disaster recovery procedures, and enabling data replication and protection across various environments. It assists with incidents like system outages, compliance issues, and potential data leaks. Many entities appreciate its block-level replication and compatibility with AWS infrastructure, although some find its effectiveness limited in multi-cloud environments. It plays a significant role in ensuring data integrity and satisfying audit requirements.

Service and Support

Customer service for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is rated highly, with responsive management and technical support. Many appreciate quick responses and effective assistance, though some express a desire for a formal ticketing system. AWS enterprise-level support is especially beneficial, providing timely support. Users often find technical support helpful and issues are resolved promptly. While some manage issues independently, others team with third parties, finding the support experience generally positive and satisfying.

Deployment

Users found the initial setup of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery to be mostly easy and straightforward. Although some required third-party assistance, many managed on their own without difficulty. Complexity varied by environment, yet most found configuration manageable with a single person. One instance involved challenges rating setup difficulty very low, while others noted successful setups without issues. Most described the process as easy, not requiring extensive teams.

Scalability

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery consistently showcases seamless scalability, easily accommodating diverse needs with automatic processes. Many organizations rate its capability between nine and ten out of ten, acknowledging its effective handling for both small and large-scale environments. The platform's ability to manage extensive nodes without issues is highlighted, alongside efficient dashboard reporting features. Investments in capacity ensure it remains adaptable, and users affirm no problems with licensing or machine scalability.

Stability

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is mostly stable and reliable. Users note no frequent issues, stating it doesn't crash and has no glitches. There can be occasional server lag or bandwidth dependence, which may require action. Evaluation ratings range from eight to nine out of ten. Some users see potential for cost concern due to data replication, yet most find performance satisfactory, and it works well without major incidents.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business55
Midsize Enterprise47
Large Enterprise138
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
5%
Non Profit
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
University
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Construction Company
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Media Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Printing Company
1%

Compare AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery was previously known as CloudEndure Disaster Recovery.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Related questions

  • 5
Comparison between AWS CloudEndure Disaster Recovery and AWS Server migration service
  • 50
Why is disaster recovery important?
  • 56
Can Continuous Data Protection (CDP) replace traditional backup?
  • 67
How does Datto compare to ShadowProtect?
  • 79
Can you recommend a disaster recovery automation tool?
  • 30
When evaluating Disaster Recovery Software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 116
What is the difference between cyber resilience and business continuity?
  • 76
Internal vs External DR Site: Pros and cons
  • 238
Why is Disaster Recovery (DR) Software important for companies?
  • 28
Disaster Recovery Software: Which is the Best Solution in the Market?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Backup and Recovery
Cloud Backup

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Rubrik vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Rubrik vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Cohesity DataProtect vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Cohesity DataProtect vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
VMware Live Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
VMware Live Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Bacula Enterprise vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Bacula Enterprise vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
MSP360 Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
MSP360 Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
NetVault Plus vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
NetVault Plus vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Quorum OnQ vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Quorum OnQ vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Actifio vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Actifio vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Cohesity Data Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo
Cohesity Data Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
See all alternatives
 
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis4.0I use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery for my organization's critical human resources solutions, appreciating its seamless integration and reduced infrastructure management. However, it lacks direct RPO and RTO status visibility, unlike previous solutions like IBM Sonavi, which complicates checking replication status.
DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs4.5I utilize AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery to deploy Docker applications hosted on GitHub. I appreciate its scalability and integration with AWS services. However, logging, pricing, and image scanning speed need improvements. I've not used Azure in my current organization.
Product Owner at Heineken4.0I use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery primarily for backup due to its stability, scalability, and cloud-based convenience. However, the cost is high. Although we've used Microsoft Azure as an alternative, AWS remains our primary provider without previous comparisons.
senior Engineer manager at Poshmark Inc.4.0I found AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery useful within AWS for cost-effective backup and DR drills, but it lacks flexibility for multi-cloud environments and integration with existing solutions, making it better suited for AWS-native setups.
Senior Sales Engineer at Sencinet4.5We primarily use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery for data protection across environments without hypervisor integration. Its ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness stand out, though we would appreciate more AI-driven automation and enhanced security features. The ROI has been substantial.
Scrum Master at Inalpie Enterprise4.0In my review of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, I noted its effectiveness in compliance strategy development and audit satisfaction, particularly for regulations like HIPAA. While AWS bolsters reputations through proactive security measures, I believe its pricing could be improved.
Systems Administrator at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees1.0While using CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, I found it stable but lacking in reducing system downtime. The network configuration was time-consuming, and the orchestration didn’t simplify disaster recovery. Improvements are needed in network setup and cloud appliance creation.
Infrastructure analyst specialized in cloud computing at IT2GO Solutions4.0I use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery to simplify disaster recovery, enabling quick AWS switchovers. The key feature is instant block replication for critical workloads. It's cost-effective compared to data centers but costly for small clients due to storage expenses.