| Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone | 4.0 | I've used Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer for four years; it's stable, well-integrated, and saves time in testing, though it's expensive, hard to deploy manually, lacks scalability, and needs better AI integration and first-line support. |
| Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I use Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer for DevOps, finding it beneficial for its ease of use, time-saving capabilities, and visibility of test cases. However, the UI could be enhanced with a modern framework for a better experience. |
| Senior Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I rate Broadcom ARD 8/10. I like its stable, scalable test case insertion, but virtual database connectivity, parameter creation, and customer service need improvement. Setup is easy, though better tools exist. |
| Data Insights & Analytics Solution Architect at BT - British Telecom | 3.5 | We use Broadcom ARD for QA requirement validation. Its user-friendly UI, scalability, and stability are excellent, with good support. Though initial setup was challenging, we desire enhanced security/authentication, but are very happy overall. |
| Senior Leader in Software Testing and Process Improvement at a tech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I found this solution excellent for multi-level test modeling, improving requirements alignment and test coverage. Its strong integration with TDM and automation reduced development cycles and issues, although model alignment and saving test subsets need improvement. |
| Test Engineer Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I use CA ARD for designing test cases and QC, valuing its unique flow restriction feature. However, I rate it 6/10 because it lacks integration with essential end-to-end automation tools like Tosca, which limits its overall effectiveness. |
| Assistant Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use this solution for user stories and traceability, finding it stable, scalable, and productive, delivering good ROI. I wish its user interface were more friendly, particularly with icon-based attachments, despite valuable defect tracking. |
| Front Line Manager at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find the product's optimization for minimum test cases and maximum coverage very valuable, and its visual diagrams are helpful. However, I need more data flexibility for multiple test sets and better, more automated integration with App Test to reduce manual effort. |
