OpenText Application Quality Management and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer compete in enhancing software testing and requirements planning. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has an edge with its comprehensive features despite a higher cost.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust test management, project tracking, and defect management. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides advanced modeling and simulation tools, reducing test case redundancy and improving testing speed.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could benefit from enhancing cloud integration, expanding automation capabilities, and incorporating more intuitive interfaces. Broadcom may improve support response times, user interface complexity, and initial deployment guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText excels in on-premise solutions with straightforward deployment and strong support. Broadcom offers cloud-based flexibility for scalability but may lag in response time compared to OpenText's immediate solutions.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText has a lower initial investment with strong ROI for cost-effectiveness. Broadcom, despite higher setup costs, provides long-term value for projects needing advanced modeling, suggesting superior ROI.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.