OpenText Application Quality Management and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer compete in the software quality and requirements management domain. OpenText Application Quality Management surpasses in pricing and support, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in features, justifying its cost.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust testing capabilities, extensive integration options, and comprehensive quality assurance processes. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides advanced modeling capabilities, streamlined software development lifecycle management, and enhanced time and cost efficiencies.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management could enhance its capabilities for smaller businesses, simplify the integration process with newer technologies, and improve user interface intuitiveness. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer may benefit from reducing initial setup complexity, expanding training resources, and enhancing collaboration features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management features a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service for swift issue resolution. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer offers flexible deployment with personalized support, catering to complex environments.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management presents a competitive initial cost with a strong ROI through efficient testing processes. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer requires a higher initial investment, but its comprehensive feature set promises long-term ROI by improving project efficiency and reducing time to market.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.