

IBM DOORS Next and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are competing in the requirements management software category. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is considered superior due to its feature richness, especially in automation, even though it comes with potentially higher costs.
Features: IBM DOORS Next offers complex requirement management, ease of integration with other IBM tools, and robust traceability. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides model-based testing, automated test case generation, and integration with test data management tools offering unique automation capabilities.
Room for Improvement: IBM DOORS Next can improve in offering smoother server performance, a more intuitive interface, and enhanced reporting features. It also could benefit from quicker adaptability to evolving client needs. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer could enhance its user interface, provide better documentation for beginners, and streamline its deployment process to make it more intuitive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DOORS Next excels in ease of deployment and customer service, with comprehensive documentation and responsive support. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, while more complex to deploy, is backed by strong technical expertise from its support team.
Pricing and ROI: IBM DOORS Next offers a cost-effective setup leading to quicker ROI due to its lower initial investment. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, despite higher upfront costs, promises greater long-term ROI through advanced testing efficiencies, making it a valuable option if the budget permits.
I did not use IBM technical support; instead, my assistance comes from friendships developed over more than 25 to 26 years with developer colleagues in the US, UK, and elsewhere.
We are happy with the technical support from IBM.
The whole company, at least the development department, used the solution.
In my opinion, IBM DOORS Next does not have any Agile support, and that is why for requirement analysis, IBM DOORS Next is correct, but for someone who is working in an Agile process, IBM DOORS Next is not the solution because it is not integrated into the Agile working process.
Developing a modular architecture that suits smaller and mid-sized projects would be beneficial.
I give eight points only because the price is a bit high.
The power, performance, and accuracy of this tool are excellent according to all clients, even though pricing is not a point of contention.
The solution has easy operation, is user-friendly, easily understood, and has better tracking for requirement management.
The traceability feature in IBM DOORS Next is very good to use during the coverage analysis.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM DOORS Next | 8.2% |
| Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer | 2.1% |
| Other | 89.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (DOORS Next) is a requirements management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It offers a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis. DOORS Next improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and aids in better decision-making through clear traceability and version control. Compared to its predecessor, DOORS 9, DOORS Next is a web-based version with a modern interface that integrates with other IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools, while DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features in a non-web-based format.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.