Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs IBM DOORS Next comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. Broadcom holds a 0.8% mindshare in ARM, compared to IBM’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Read 21 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews
  • 645 Views
  • 168 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
IBM DOORS Next
Read 15 IBM DOORS Next reviews
  • 3,045 Views
  • 3,045 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

IBM DOORS Next and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are competing in the requirements management software category. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is considered superior due to its feature richness, especially in automation, even though it comes with potentially higher costs.

Features: IBM DOORS Next offers complex requirement management, ease of integration with other IBM tools, and robust traceability. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides model-based testing, automated test case generation, and integration with test data management tools offering unique automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM DOORS Next can improve in offering smoother server performance, a more intuitive interface, and enhanced reporting features. It also could benefit from quicker adaptability to evolving client needs. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer could enhance its user interface, provide better documentation for beginners, and streamline its deployment process to make it more intuitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DOORS Next excels in ease of deployment and customer service, with comprehensive documentation and responsive support. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, while more complex to deploy, is backed by strong technical expertise from its support team.

Pricing and ROI: IBM DOORS Next offers a cost-effective setup leading to quicker ROI due to its lower initial investment. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, despite higher upfront costs, promises greater long-term ROI through advanced testing efficiencies, making it a valuable option if the budget permits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM DOORS Next Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM DOORS Next
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer boosts efficiency, reduces costs and defects, accelerates delivery, and integrates seamlessly, improving ROI and productivity.
Sentiment score
6.9
IBM DOORS Next shortens project completion times and possibly reduces costs by easing reporting for frequently audited companies.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some experience delays and inconsistent expertise.
Sentiment score
7.1
IBM DOORS Next offers generally efficient customer service, with knowledgeable support, though resolution delays vary by issue complexity.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
We are happy with the technical support from IBM.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM DOORS Next report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in scalability, supporting projects efficiently with minor initial adjustments despite some Kubernetes concerns.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM DOORS Next efficiently handles large-scale projects and complex data, supporting scalability and is appreciated for improved document management.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
The whole company, at least the development department, used the solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM DOORS Next report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is stable and reliable, with strong support and addressed issues, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
6.8
IBM DOORS Next stability varies, with some initial setup issues, but many report stability after resolving infrastructure challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs UI improvements, better integration, workflow simplification, enhanced security, and modernized graphics for efficiency.
IBM DOORS Next struggles with stability, user interface issues, limited integration, outdated features, and slow support response times.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
In my opinion, IBM DOORS Next does not have any Agile support, and that is why for requirement analysis, IBM DOORS Next is correct, but for someone who is working in an Agile process, IBM DOORS Next is not the solution because it is not integrated into the Agile working process.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM DOORS Next report
 

Setup Cost

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's pricing varies by team size, with enterprise agreements recommended for large groups to manage costs.
IBM DOORS Next is costly with complex licensing but valued for its support, despite limited future development speculation.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
I give eight points only because the price is a bit high.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM DOORS Next report
 

Valuable Features

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer enhances testing efficiency with automation, seamless integration, data management, and workflow optimization for engineers.
IBM DOORS Next provides traceability, integration, and scalability, with features like artifact linking, versioning, and web-based efficient management.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
We were able to define well-structured requirements with links, and it was similar to using a Word document.
The solution has easy operation, is user-friendly, easily understood, and has better tracking for requirement management.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM DOORS Next report
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (8th), Test Design Automation (3rd)
IBM DOORS Next
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM DOORS Next is 9.4%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management
 

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation
I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.
Read full review
Roger Trackwell - PeerSpot reviewer
An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements
The biggest thing is that it shows cradle to grave traceability between the initial parent requirement and the lowest level, or what we call a CID, a critical item development spec. You can establish your verification plans in DOORS, and then as you get test results, you can put them in DOORS as a link or as a pointer to where that specific test resides on a company database. Then you can also write compliance rationale and add a column for coding, like pass, fail, green, yellow, red, meets, does not meet, partially meets, or whatever scoring criteria you want to use. Like I said, the best thing about it is that it provides you that visibility of your verification, allowing you to know how close you are to your pre-production activities, prototyping, go ahead, or whatever it is.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
27%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
23%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?
The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The tr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?
The solution is slightly high in terms of affordability. I give eight points only because the price is a bit high, which is the only problem since I am the purchasing person, but not the technical ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?
We are not interested in integration with lifecycle management tools. If required, we will connect to the local India team for dashboard reporting tools or additional features. I am not an exact us...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 25% of the time
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 23% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 17% of the time
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 14% of the time
Jama Connect vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Jama Connect vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 11% of the time
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors
IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next Logo
IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next
Compared 36% of the time
Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next Logo
Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next
Compared 20% of the time
Jira vs IBM DOORS Next Logo
Jira vs IBM DOORS Next
Compared 16% of the time
Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next Logo
Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next
Compared 15% of the time
3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next Logo
3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next
Compared 5% of the time
More IBM DOORS Next Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
August 2025
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reportDownload Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM DOORS Next
August 2025
IBM DOORS Next reportDownload IBM DOORS Next product report
 

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
Rational DOORS Next Generation, RDNG, Rational Requirements Composer and IBM RRC
 

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Broadcom


IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (DOORS Next) is a requirements management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It offers a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis. DOORS Next improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and aids in better decision-making through clear traceability and version control. Compared to its predecessor, DOORS 9, DOORS Next is a web-based version with a modern interface that integrates with other IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools, while DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features in a non-web-based format.


IBM
 

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank
Major health insurer
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM DOORS Next
July 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM DOORS Next
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM DOORS Next and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM DOORS Next report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.