

TestRail and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are prominent tools in the field of requirements management and testing. TestRail has the upper hand in ease of deployment, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is preferred for its robust feature set despite a higher price point.
Features: TestRail impresses with its simplicity, organizational capabilities, and comprehensive test case management. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer offers advanced modeling, automated test creation, and superior integration capabilities, making its feature set more expansive.
Room for Improvement: TestRail could enhance its reporting capabilities, add more integration options, and improve its user interface. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs better performance, a more intuitive user experience, and reduced complexity in some areas.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestRail is appreciated for its straightforward deployment process and excellent customer service. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has a more complex deployment process but provides comprehensive customer assistance that effectively addresses issues.
Pricing and ROI: TestRail is praised for its reasonable setup costs and a solid return on investment due to its efficient feature set. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer involves higher initial costs but justifies this through its extensive features, which results in a higher perceived ROI.
Time-wise, it saves about fifteen to twenty percent compared to Excel, and money-wise, it's around ten percent.
I personally escalate Leapwork issues with the Leapwork support tech team, and they are very quick to solve problems.
Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy.
Just today we had a hiccup where it didn't want to integrate with Jira.
When I started automation testing in my current company, we only had 10-20 automated test cases integrated with TestRail, but we gradually increased to 100, 200, 1000, and 2000 cases.
It also doesn't have the analytics and dashboards that you need for large scale enterprise implementations, which is why it's not really scalable.
I have never experienced any issues with its scalability.
It has never had any issues.
I would say seven or an eight because sometimes there are hiccups in the interface with Jira, for example.
If you want to use TestRail for enterprise-level waterfall projects with traditional reporting and a lot of analytics, it's not good enough because the analytics, dashboards, and reporting are not really there.
I would appreciate AI features that help design test cases based on documented requirements.
It offers good value for money.
It significantly saves effort in managing test execution and managing all test cases.
The reporting capabilities and the simplicity of it make it user-friendly, as new users can easily understand the tool.
The integration with Jira is good. I like that because it helps to show your test results and helps you to keep traceability between your user stories and your test results.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| TestRail | 7.9% |
| Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer | 3.5% |
| Other | 88.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.