Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Tricentis qTest comparison

Broadcom and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 3.2% mindshare in TMT, compared to Tricentis’s 14.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Read 21 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews
  • 696 Views
  • 362 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Tricentis qTest
Read 19 Tricentis qTest reviews
  • 1,791 Views
  • 1,290 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Tricentis qTest and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are prominent tools in the software development lifecycle. Tricentis qTest has the upper hand for ease of use and testing features, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in requirements management and modeling for complex projects.

Features: Tricentis qTest offers intuitive test management, seamless integration with other tools, and strong reporting functionalities. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides advanced modeling, requirements traceability, and automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis qTest could benefit from enhanced performance and additional integration options. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs a more intuitive interface and simplified navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis qTest scores well for ease of deployment, with a straightforward setup process and reliable customer support. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's deployment is more complex, but its customer service is highly regarded for technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis qTest users report satisfactory pricing and good ROI, especially for small to midsize projects. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is more expensive, justified by its extensive feature set and higher ROI for large-scale implementations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis qTest Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis qTest
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer boosts efficiency, reduces costs and defects, accelerates delivery, and integrates seamlessly, improving ROI and productivity.
Sentiment score
1.0
Tricentis qTest enhances efficiency and returns with easy use, reusable features, and rapid adoption, despite skill set challenges.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
Due to the fast adoption, there is a quick ROI along with faster and better maintenance due to Tosca's AI and self-healing aspects.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some experience delays and inconsistent expertise.
Sentiment score
1.0
Tricentis qTest support is generally quick and helpful but occasionally struggles with initial delays and setup communication.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
Support has never been an issue, except for consulting which Tricentis charges for.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in scalability, supporting projects efficiently with minor initial adjustments despite some Kubernetes concerns.
Sentiment score
8.3
Tricentis qTest offers excellent scalability and ease of use for global teams, despite complex navigation for some users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is stable and reliable, with strong support and addressed issues, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
8.1
Tricentis qTest is stable with minimal downtime, though users note occasional glitches and room for stability improvements.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
As for stability and performance, apart from a few hiccups and glitches, Tricentis qTest worked fine.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
 

Room For Improvement

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs UI improvements, better integration, workflow simplification, enhanced security, and modernized graphics for efficiency.
Tricentis qTest needs faster reporting, better API documentation, improved JIRA integration, UI updates, and enhanced user management.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
There may be missing features that should be included in the next release of Tricentis qTest, such as integration with other tools, specifically integration with Parasoft.
It also does not allow for task tracking or calculating time spent on tasks, which affects project timelines.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
 

Setup Cost

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's pricing varies by team size, with enterprise agreements recommended for large groups to manage costs.
Tricentis qTest offers competitive yearly pricing for shared global licenses, with costs varying based on package size and features.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
The solution is expensive.
The pricing and execution of qTest are easy.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
 

Valuable Features

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer enhances testing efficiency with automation, seamless integration, data management, and workflow optimization for engineers.
Tricentis qTest offers intuitive test management, agile lifecycle support, and seamless integrations to enhance efficiency and global collaboration.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
There are also AI insights available based on the data and defects raised, which gives a view of functionalities where there are challenges and where more regression needs to happen.
A valuable feature is the ease of uploading, as well as creating folders.
I have seen measurable benefits with Tricentis qTest in terms of time-saving and resource-saving.
For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report
reviewer2356440 - PeerSpot reviewer
PA
reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (7th), Test Design Automation (3rd)
Tricentis qTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.2%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 14.4%, up from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tricentis qTest14.4%
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer3.2%
Other82.4%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation
I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.
Read full review
SamuLehikoinen - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient and collaborative software testing providing comprehensive test management capabilities, seamless integration with various tools and impressive manual regression testing features
The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved. Some of the modules appear to be loosely connected, but despite these aspects, our overall experience with the tool was positive. When you begin integrating your testing tools with qTest, the available examples may not be very clear, and I believe this is an area that could be enhanced, particularly in terms of providing clearer integration guidance. While the tool's integration with various testing tools is impressive, there is room for improvement in showcasing more cases and benefits, especially through additional videos and documentation.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tricentis qTest?
I found the reporting aspect to be the most valuable as it provided a comprehensive overview of the efforts needed and the workload for individual tests.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?
The solution is expensive. For the features that are available, depending on the volumes of licenses we get, we are able to get better discounts as strategic partners of Tosca. We can pass some ben...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?
Customers are moving towards Tricentis due to their association with SAP. There is interest in understanding if there are connectors for converting UFT scripts to Tosca, as many customers are looki...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 25% of the time
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 21% of the time
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 18% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 14% of the time
OpenText DevPartner vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
OpenText DevPartner vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 11% of the time
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 33% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 24% of the time
TestRail vs Tricentis qTest Logo
TestRail vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 13% of the time
Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest Logo
Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 7% of the time
More Tricentis qTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
October 2025
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reportDownload Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
October 2025
Tricentis qTest reportDownload Tricentis qTest product report
 

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
qTest
 

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Broadcom

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality. 

Tricentis
 

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank
McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis qTest
September 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis qTest
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis qTest and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis qTest report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.