Wrike offers dynamic project management capabilities with Gantt charts and time tracking, ensuring efficient collaboration and task customization. It integrates with Google Apps and features mobile accessibility for enhanced user engagement.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Wrike | 2.4% |
| Jira | 3.5% |
| monday.com | 3.5% |
| Other | 90.6% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jira | 4.1 | 3.5% | 91% | 281 interviewsAdd to research |
| monday.com | 4.7 | 3.5% | 98% | 237 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 88 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 37 |
| Large Enterprise | 119 |
Wrike's platform facilitates seamless project and task management, time tracking, and collaboration across IT, marketing, and other departments. It supports project timelines and uses customizable dashboards for efficient task management. Despite a steep learning curve, its integration capabilities and mobile access provide a competitive edge. Users highlight areas for improvement like exporting datasets and better mobile app functionality but value its flexible task assignment and management features.
What are Wrike's Key Features?Wrike is widely used in industries like AEC and property management, where it supports project timelines, ticketing, communication, and reporting. Global companies employ Wrike for workflow management, onboarding tasks, and utilizing views like Kanban to manage tasks efficiently.
Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Project Manager at NebuFlow | 3.5 | I use Wrike for project management, valuing its forms, communication, and MS Office integration. I find multi-channel access and project data transfer difficult. I rate it 7/10 and recommend it. |
| BIM Manager at PG Design Studio Inc | 5.0 | I find Wrike centralizes project management, significantly improving communication and organization, especially for AEC. Its stable platform and excellent customer service are strengths. While large projects can have slow dependency updates, and it requires a very organized workflow, I believe it offers great long-term value. |
| Student | 3.5 | I find Wrike's tag functionality very valuable, but it's slow and too expensive for my small team. The mobile app also lacks features. Despite this, I rate it 7/10 and wish my team could afford to use it more. |
| Senior Marketing Specialist at Credit Union West | 4.5 | I find this intuitive tool excellent for marketing collaboration, offering easy project tracking and quick updates. While stable and scalable, it needs direct email updates, and I rate it 9/10. |
| IT Project Coordinator at LeafHome | 4.0 | I use Wrike for project management and time tracking, finding its time tracking and reports valuable. However, I desire improved project reports, a higher-level dashboard, and better task breakdown to manage individual assignments more effectively. |
| Project Manager and Innovation Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find the solution stable, reliable, and user-friendly for project tracking. My main improvements would be faster cloud updates and more comprehensive reporting with better filtering. I rate it 8/10. |
| Manager at a engineering company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I find Wrike offers good visibility and organization, but it's expensive and needs to be more responsive to community feature requests, especially for inter-project dependencies. While functional, it often ignores user input. |
| CEO at SharKom Srl | 4.0 | I use Wrike for project organization, valuing its task management and multiple views. It's stable, but I'd like better cloud resource analysis for performance, and setup can be complex. I rate it 8/10. |
