Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings.Challenges Wrike helps solve:
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Wrike | 2.4% |
| Jira | 3.5% |
| monday.com | 3.5% |
| Other | 90.6% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jira | 4.1 | 3.5% | 91% | 281 interviewsAdd to research |
| monday.com | 4.7 | 3.5% | 98% | 236 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 87 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 37 |
| Large Enterprise | 121 |
Main benefits:
Why Wrike?
Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Project Manager at NebuFlow | 3.5 | I use Wrike as a project management tool to track timelines and communicate efficiently. The form system and Microsoft Office integration are valuable, but improvements are needed in handling multiple channels, data transfer, and stakeholder coordination. Financial features would also enhance usability. |
| BIM Manager at PG Design Studio Inc | 5.0 | I find Wrike centralizes project management, significantly improving communication and organization, especially for AEC. Its stable platform and excellent customer service are strengths. While large projects can have slow dependency updates, and it requires a very organized workflow, I believe it offers great long-term value. |
| Student | 3.5 | I find Wrike's tag functionality very valuable, but it's slow and too expensive for my small team. The mobile app also lacks features. Despite this, I rate it 7/10 and wish my team could afford to use it more. |
| Senior Marketing Specialist at Credit Union West | 4.5 | I find this intuitive tool excellent for marketing collaboration, offering easy project tracking and quick updates. While stable and scalable, it needs direct email updates, and I rate it 9/10. |
| IT Project Coordinator at LeafHome | 4.0 | I use Wrike for project management and time tracking, finding its time tracking and reports valuable. However, I desire improved project reports, a higher-level dashboard, and better task breakdown to manage individual assignments more effectively. |
| Project Manager and Innovation Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find the solution stable, reliable, and user-friendly for project tracking. My main improvements would be faster cloud updates and more comprehensive reporting with better filtering. I rate it 8/10. |
| Manager at a engineering company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I find Wrike offers good visibility and organization, but it's expensive and needs to be more responsive to community feature requests, especially for inter-project dependencies. While functional, it often ignores user input. |
| CEO at SharKom Srl | 4.0 | I use Wrike for project organization, valuing its task management and multiple views. It's stable, but I'd like better cloud resource analysis for performance, and setup can be complex. I rate it 8/10. |
