Planview AdaptiveWork vs Wrike comparison

Read 59 Wrike reviews

3,701 Views
3,035 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Planview AdaptiveWork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Planview AdaptiveWork and Wrike are contenders in the project management tools category. Wrike stands out with its advanced features, while Planview AdaptiveWork is noted for its competitive pricing and robust support.

Features: Planview AdaptiveWork provides comprehensive project tracking, custom workflows, and flexible timeline management. Wrike offers advanced collaboration tools, customizable workflows, and seamless integration with popular apps, enhancing task management efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Planview AdaptiveWork can improve its user interface to match modern standards and expand integration capabilities. It could also benefit from enhanced mobile app functionality. Wrike should address its complex pricing structure, enhance its reporting features, and improve learning resources for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wrike provides streamlined deployment with excellent customer support options, ensuring efficient integration. Planview AdaptiveWork, while offering strong support during deployment, may require more time to fully implement due to its extensive feature set.

Pricing and ROI: Planview AdaptiveWork offers budget-friendly pricing aimed at delivering strong ROI through balanced features and cost. While Wrike is higher in setup costs, its advanced feature set offers substantial value, justifying its price through improved long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview AdaptiveWork vs. Wrike Report (Updated: April 2026).

Planview AdaptiveWork vs. Wrike

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview AdaptiveWork

Ranking in Project Management Software

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wrike

Ranking in Project Management Software

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Planview AdaptiveWork is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wrike is 2.7%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Wrike	2.7%
Planview AdaptiveWork	1.5%
Other	95.8%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh11

Director BPM at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has resources management and timesheets but could be more flexible

Compared to Broadcom Clarity, there was some flexibility with blueprints, etc. You can create a blueprint for different business groups or different customers. Planview AdaptiveWork doesn't have something like that. If they can build up something like a view price. It's still a traditional way where you have to create different instances for different customers. The PPM solution uses queries if I'm rolling out for different divisions. In that case, I have to create different instances for each region because each division may have a different look and feel. But if I have a blueprint, then it's very convenient. I can create multiple interfaces for different processes. Broadcom Clarity has some access control on those viewpoints.

Read full review

Awadhesh Singh

Project Manager at NebuFlow

Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the project management solution. It's really nice."

"I like the project management solution."

"Clarizen Slide Publisher has helped increase transparency and communication with project stakeholders for us."

"The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaboration feature enhances our team's productivity by allowing individuals to see the impact of their decisions on projects owned and managed by other teams."

"Clarizen's reporting features have been critical."

"Clarizen's strength is reporting. Aside from reporting, I also like the ability to create customized workflow and custom actions. The workflow rules are handy. For example, you can create custom fields and dependent picklists."

"Provides visibility into employee utilization, progress on specific client projects and a portfolio view of all programs."

"Slide Publisher has been a lifesaver for us; it saves us five to 10 hours a week."

"The most valued features to us are the sleek design and the ability to group tasks by project, folder, or department without repetition."

"Customer Service: Awesome: 10 out of 10. From how they set their website so that you can find the info, and look at videos to immediate and thorough response in the live chat."

"Wrike is the best project management tool I have used so far."

"Dashboard customization"

"Customer Service: Very impressive."

"This is a good tool for project progress tracking and sharing tasks with internal and external parties."

"By creating a custom dashboard with daily priorities employees stay motivated and efficient."

"The solution is bug-free and reliable."

More Wrike pros

Cons

"One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data."

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."

"Have struggled with reporting and user adoption."

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get really slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"Wrike is the best only when you minimize the screen, as the letters can become too small to read."

"The pay model is in blocks of users - would be nice to add one user at a time"

"There is a learning curve, so employees just starting out with Wrike take a few weeks to feel comfortable."

"The dataset that can be exported and built-in reports/dashboards needs improvement."

"One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person."

"The mobile interface really needs work. It's hard to navigate and find tasks or folders/projects."

"The customer service is great, but it is not perfect but they really help you."

"It doesn't allow you to quickly see whether certain teams are over-scheduled at a quick glance."

More Wrike cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."

"Wrike is expensive."

"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."

"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Wrike?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wrike?

I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Wrike?

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend it to others.

See all answers

Comparisons

monday.com vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 6% of the time

Semantic Space Technologies PPM Studio vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

INGENIOUS.BUILD vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview AdaptiveWork Competitors

monday.com vs Wrike

Compared 10% of the time

Asana vs Wrike

Compared 9% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Wrike

Compared 6% of the time

Smartsheet vs Wrike

Compared 6% of the time

Project.net vs Wrike

Compared 2% of the time

More Wrike Competitors

Product Reports

Planview AdaptiveWork

Download Planview AdaptiveWork product report

Download Wrike product report

Also Known As

Planview Clarizen

No data available

Overview

Planview AdaptiveWork enhances project and resource management through customizable reports and streamlined workflows. Offering transparency and time-saving benefits, it facilitates efficient decision-making with effective management of key metrics and visualizations.

Planview AdaptiveWork is sought after for its comprehensive project and resource management capabilities, offering detailed portfolio visibility and employee utilization tracking. Organizations find value in its reporting features, including customizable dashboards and the Slide Publisher, which streamline presentations and enhance transparency. Automated workflows and collaboration tools reduce manual effort, boosting productivity. However, it lacks the flexibility of competitors like Broadcom Clarity, particularly in catering to diverse business needs. Some users find the interface less intuitive and certain features, such as schedule management and partial automation, pose challenges.

What are the main features of Planview AdaptiveWork?

Project and Resource Management: Enables effective tracking and utilization.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances insight and transparency in reporting.
Slide Publisher: Simplifies the creation of presentation assets.
Automated Workflows: Increases efficiency by reducing manual tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with other tools to streamline operations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Decision-Making: Efficiently manages key metrics and visualizations.
Time Savings: Automated features reduce the time spent on routine tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better teamwork through integrated tools.
Transparency: Offers comprehensive views of project portfolios and resources.
Adaptability: Serves various team needs beyond project management.

Planview AdaptiveWork is implemented in sectors focusing on program and portfolio management, proving essential in tracking timesheets and finances with multiple rate cards. It integrates financial data into project plans for accurate forecasting and supports teams with custom workflows for ongoing maintenance. Additionally, it adapts to deliverable tracking and reporting, serving as a robust content repository or library, catering to diverse team requirements in industries beyond conventional project management.

Planview

Wrike offers dynamic project management capabilities with Gantt charts and time tracking, ensuring efficient collaboration and task customization. It integrates with Google Apps and features mobile accessibility for enhanced user engagement.

Wrike's platform facilitates seamless project and task management, time tracking, and collaboration across IT, marketing, and other departments. It supports project timelines and uses customizable dashboards for efficient task management. Despite a steep learning curve, its integration capabilities and mobile access provide a competitive edge. Users highlight areas for improvement like exporting datasets and better mobile app functionality but value its flexible task assignment and management features.

What are Wrike's Key Features?

Dynamic Gantt Chart: Streamlines project management with comprehensive timeline visualization.
Time Tracking: Robust features for monitoring task and project time allocation.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork through effective communication and task assignment.
Google Apps Integration: Seamlessly connects with Google's productivity suite.
Email Functionality: Efficient management and tracking of email communications.
Customizable Dashboards: Personalize task views for effective monitoring.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Expect?

Enhanced Collaboration: Improves team communication and assignment efficiency.
Task Customization: Flexibly assign and organize tasks across folders.
Mobile Accessibility: Access projects anywhere, enhancing project engagement.
Integrations: Supports existing workflows with popular productivity tools.
User Engagement: Intuitive design encourages active participation and monitoring.

Wrike is widely used in industries like AEC and property management, where it supports project timelines, ticketing, communication, and reporting. Global companies employ Wrike for workflow management, onboarding tasks, and utilizing views like Kanban to manage tasks efficiently.

Sample Customers

Cisco Capital, JLL, Conagra Brands, Cargill, JLL, IBM, IIROC, Siemens Energy

Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic

Planview AdaptiveWork vs. Wrike