"Performance has been good. Stability has been good."
"The solution can be customized for individual projects and quite easy to use."
"It allows you to be granular, and send each step."
"The solution is more of a streamlined Slack."
"Has very good collaborative functions."
"The global search is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"monday.com is easy to set up."
"The value is that monday.com provides us with an overall picture of how much work a teammate has."
"It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly."
"Not a suitable solution for complex projects."
"The user admin module could be more accessible."
"In my initial exposure to the interface, I did not find it to be very user-friendly."
"What would be nice is if I had two days between deadlines and adjusted the day if it would automatically adjust the deadlines, even if I had to change one or two that might no longer work, it would save a lot of steps."
"They could offer more packages. There seems to be a gap in price between package offers. One has as much as a $30 difference."
"The solution has dashboards, however, you have a limited amount. You may only get ten when you need closer to 30. We often need to create many boards. For example, we might need one board per customer. If we have more than ten customers, we run out of boards available. I'm not sure if you can pay more in order to get more or if it's just a design limitation. It's unclear. In any case, they should be more generous."
"Sometimes allocating between team members via the communication tool can be difficult."
"Some of the automation is having some technical difficulties."
"On one side, it's very easy to create a task with text, but on the other side, it's not very well-formatted. Therefore, it's difficult to track specific data written in a task. We are making templates, but it's not enough to use a template to know the exact status of different tasks. One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person. This is what is really missing in Wrike as compared to other tools. We are looking to replace Wrike because we need support for workflow. Another issue with Wrike is that they bring a lot of versions of the tool, which it's not so easy. They bring new versions very frequently, and these versions look similar. For example, we are using robots to read the tasks in the tools, which is problematic with Wrike because it is changing very frequently."
Earn 20 points
Perfectly scalable, fully customizable, and supported for thousands of users. From managing core processes to team management to project or task management, monday.com has got your back.
Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings. Challenges Wrike helps solve:
monday.com is ranked unranked in Project Portfolio Management with 9 reviews while Wrike is ranked 15th in Project Management Software with 1 review. monday.com is rated 7.8, while Wrike is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of monday.com writes "Nicely streamlined with good features and an easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wrike writes "Flexible and easy-to-use but lacks real workflow support and tasks management feature". monday.com is most compared with Asana, Microsoft Project, Trello, Jira and Smartsheet, whereas Wrike is most compared with Trello, Asana, Project.net, Broadcom Clarity PPM and ProofHub.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.