OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Targetprocess comparison

OpenText and Apptio are both solutions in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Apptio is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 2.5% mindshare in EAP, compared to Apptio’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

867 Views
35 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Targetprocess

279 Views
79 Comparison Views

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Targetprocess

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management and Targetprocess compete in the project management and software delivery domains. Targetprocess has an upper hand in detailed visualization and project control, while OpenText stands out with accessible pricing.

Features: OpenText Software Delivery Management offers resource management, collaboration tools, and team planning features. Targetprocess is known for visual management tools, flexible project tracking, and comprehensive control capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Targetprocess provides a flexible deployment model and strong customer service. OpenText has solid deployment options but may lack in customer service responsiveness compared to Targetprocess.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Software Delivery Management's competitive setup costs make it appealing for budget constraints, ensuring good ROI. Targetprocess might have higher initial costs but provides long-term value with its features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,945 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th)

Targetprocess

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

12th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Value Stream Management Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 2.5%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Use Targetprocess?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,945 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

24%

Educational Organization

22%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 46% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

Jira Align vs Targetprocess

Compared 46% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Targetprocess

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Targetprocess

Compared 20% of the time

More Targetprocess Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

June 2025

Download Targetprocess product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

No data available

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Targetprocess is a cloud-based enterprise Agile planning platform designed to accelerate business value delivery by bridging strategy and execution seamlessly. It offers a unified view of work spanning teams, departments, and projects, making it effortless to scale Agile practices swiftly. With features like work item management, Kanban and Scrum boards, roadmapping, and robust reporting and analytics, Targetprocess empowers organizations of all sizes to effectively manage their Agile planning needs.

Apptio

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, ServiceNow and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,945 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.