No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitLab vs Targetprocess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
GitLab boosts ROI by enhancing DevOps performance, reducing deployment time, and facilitating frequent, efficient, and agile releases.
Sentiment score
8.9
Targetprocess enhanced monitoring, planning, and collaboration while reducing costs and reliance on spreadsheets through improved transparency and data integration.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione
In terms of operational efficiency, a ten to twenty percent increase in speed could quite easily be seen from using the Issues and Epics tracking feature.
Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Fleet Manager at UPS
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
Project Manager at Target
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
GitLab support is praised for responsiveness, with community forums aiding open-source users; license impacts direct support access.
Sentiment score
9.1
Targetprocess customer support is mostly praised as responsive and effective, with high ratings and occasional proactive engagement noted.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The customer support for Targetprocess is not very proactive twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, but sometimes they are very active and helpful.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The customer support for Targetprocess is one of the best
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
GitLab is praised for scalability and flexibility in deployment, with some challenges in on-premises setups, requiring specific skills.
Sentiment score
9.4
Targetprocess excels in scalability, efficiently handling growth, diverse projects, and large datasets while maintaining high performance and adaptability.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
Senior Application Developer at IBM
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
Manager, Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
Fleet Manager at UPS
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
Project Manager at Target
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab is praised for high stability, minimal issues, and effective support, maintaining reliability across diverse setups.
Sentiment score
9.2
Targetprocess is stable and reliable, though the dashboard may experience lag with large data sets.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
Chief Technology Officer at Acclym
We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.
Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Targetprocess is very stable.
Project Manager at Target
 

Room For Improvement

GitLab should enhance cloud integration, UI, documentation, and tool integration while improving performance, simplicity, pricing, and security options.
Targetprocess needs better integration, user-friendliness, AI features, personalization, cost reduction, and performance improvements for large data dashboards.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
Manager, Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
Senior Application Developer at IBM
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
 

Setup Cost

GitLab provides flexible pricing with valued features but may seem costly for larger teams, offering free and premium options.
Enterprise buyers generally find Targetprocess affordable, competitive, and easy to set up, though costs may rise with extensive use.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
Senior Application Developer at IBM
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
Project Manager at Target
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Targetprocess were cost-effective and relatively affordable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
 

Valuable Features

GitLab excels in CI/CD, integration, security, and collaboration with features like unique merge requests and role-based access control.
Targetprocess enhances work management with seamless Jira integration, customization, transparency, and cost efficiency via AWS financial integration.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Manager, Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Some of the best features Targetprocess offers include business strategy alignment, resourcing information, mapping of work being executed with business outcomes, and visibility across the enterprise portfolio.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Categories and Ranking

GitLab
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
91
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (6th), Build Automation (3rd), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (4th), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)
Targetprocess
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 26.0%, down from 26.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitLab26.0%
Targetprocess1.5%
Other72.5%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji - PeerSpot reviewer
System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration
GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.
Joseph  Washington - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Target
Visual workflow has improved planning and reporting and now supports data driven decisions
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way. It lets us use graphical and custom reports to pinpoint certain trends and I am able to forecast performance. Additionally, program board management, risk stroke dependency management, creating graphs and dashboards, and project governance planning are also great features. Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization because the license cost is low, hence saving a lot of time and cost. Efficiency has been improved. I am able to save approximately three to four hours per project. Also, it has increased levels of cross-team transparency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise49
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
The setup cost for GitLab is minimal since the team has its own minimal resource balancing. The costing falls into an intermediate stage and is impactful across all results within the team. It allo...
What needs improvement with GitLab?
There are many improvements that GitLab can implement, such as addressing the issue of caching. Currently, when I have multiple tasks to merge or attempt multiple merges, the CI/CD and overall GitL...
What is your primary use case for GitLab?
My main use case for GitLab is as a version control system that we are using. Currently, I am working on an end-to-end AI pipeline, and I have deployed my whole code using GitLab so that all things...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective. The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration. Also, personalization capabilities at every user level should be improved. I would add that it should allow users to navigate easily.
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is a powerful product that is frequently used by the whole organization. The powerful visualization of my workflow is a blessing because it allows me to have a perfect distraction-fre...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Fuzzit
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Targetprocess and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.