

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
In terms of operational efficiency, a ten to twenty percent increase in speed could quite easily be seen from using the Issues and Epics tracking feature.
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
The customer support for Targetprocess is not very proactive twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, but sometimes they are very active and helpful.
The customer support for Targetprocess is one of the best
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Targetprocess is very stable.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Targetprocess were cost-effective and relatively affordable.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
Some of the best features Targetprocess offers include business strategy alignment, resourcing information, mapping of work being executed with business outcomes, and visibility across the enterprise portfolio.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| GitLab | 26.0% |
| Targetprocess | 1.5% |
| Other | 72.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 38 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.
GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.
What are GitLab's most valuable features?In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.
Targetprocess provides seamless Jira integration for enhanced collaboration and planning. It aids in managing workforces and portfolios efficiently, offering clear visualization across teams, and supports AI-enhanced integration with third-party tools to streamline planning processes.
Targetprocess is designed to improve cost and time management with customizable dashboards and intuitive UI. It offers effective report generation and fosters agility, reducing tool redundancy. Users find value in its comprehensive capabilities to consolidate data, perform impact assessments, and manage software backlogs efficiently. It promotes clear visualization and transparency across departments while centralizing intake and workflow management. However, some aspects like user-friendliness in its interface and better single sign-on functionality require improvements. Challenges include the need for enhanced AI capabilities, improved notification options, and more intuitive search features.
What important features define Targetprocess?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Targetprocess is implemented across sectors to manage portfolio demand and streamline workflows. It is especially useful for IT management, enabling devices and infrastructure monitoring, aligning projects with strategic objectives, and facilitating Agile, ITSM, and traditional frameworks adaptation. It significantly boosts productivity and collaboration by organizing backlogs and managing resources effectively, offering robust features for centralized intake and workflow management.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.