No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Planview AgilePlace vs Targetprocess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Planview AgilePlace eases administrative burdens, supports remote work, and satisfies board demands despite some users' focus on anecdotal benefits.
Sentiment score
8.9
Targetprocess enhanced monitoring, planning, and collaboration while reducing costs and reliance on spreadsheets through improved transparency and data integration.
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
Project Manager at Target
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Planview AgilePlace's support is praised for responsiveness and effective assistance, though feature enhancement timelines can be frustrating.
Sentiment score
9.1
Targetprocess customer support is mostly praised as responsive and effective, with high ratings and occasional proactive engagement noted.
The customer support for Targetprocess is one of the best
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Project Manager at Target
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Planview AgilePlace supports large-scale operations, effective integrations, and agile methodologies, ensuring stable performance and benefiting diverse global teams.
Sentiment score
9.4
Targetprocess excels in scalability, efficiently handling growth, diverse projects, and large datasets while maintaining high performance and adaptability.
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
Project Manager at Target
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Planview AgilePlace and LeanKit are praised for stability, with minimal downtime and quick resolution of issues.
Sentiment score
9.2
Targetprocess is stable and reliable, though the dashboard may experience lag with large data sets.
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Targetprocess is very stable.
Project Manager at Target
 

Room For Improvement

Planview AgilePlace users seek improved integrations, scrum, reporting, project management features, and pricing adjustments for better functionality and flexibility.
Targetprocess needs better integration, user-friendliness, AI features, personalization, cost reduction, and performance improvements for large data dashboards.
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
It should allow users to navigate easily.
Project Manager at Target
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find Planview AgilePlace pricing worthwhile, appreciating FLEX licensing for application consolidation and favorable agreements.
Enterprise buyers generally find Targetprocess affordable, competitive, and easy to set up, though costs may rise with extensive use.
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
Project Manager at Target
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The licensing cost is very affordable.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Valuable Features

Planview AgilePlace boosts productivity with customizable Kanban boards, easy work tracking, and seamless integration for enhanced project management.
Targetprocess enhances work management with seamless Jira integration, customization, transparency, and cost efficiency via AWS financial integration.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
Some of the best features Targetprocess offers include business strategy alignment, resourcing information, mapping of work being executed with business outcomes, and visibility across the enterprise portfolio.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Categories and Ranking

Planview AgilePlace
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (19th)
Targetprocess
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of Planview AgilePlace is 2.9%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Targetprocess1.5%
Planview AgilePlace2.9%
Other95.6%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1684173 - PeerSpot reviewer
PM Systems Analyst at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Simple and intuitive, useful for agile management, and helpful for planning based on our capacity and meeting our deadlines
Every feature is valuable. LeanKit is a Kanban-based tool where you have a visual interface that you can use to create various cards and to create boards to house those cards. You can create a board for managing project work. You can create a board to do PI planning. It is pretty close to the agile way of doing business. The Board Layout Editor is excellent in terms of flexibility. They have been improving its usability. Their development is very much agile, so for any feedback that we give them, they let us know if and when they would act on our request for enhancements or change, and then they make those changes. They are responsive.
Joseph  Washington - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Target
Visual workflow has improved planning and reporting and now supports data driven decisions
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way. It lets us use graphical and custom reports to pinpoint certain trends and I am able to forecast performance. Additionally, program board management, risk stroke dependency management, creating graphs and dashboards, and project governance planning are also great features. Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization because the license cost is low, hence saving a lot of time and cost. Efficiency has been improved. I am able to save approximately three to four hours per project. Also, it has increased levels of cross-team transparency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective. The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration. Also, personalization capabilities at every user level should be improved. I would add that it should allow users to navigate easily.
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is a powerful product that is frequently used by the whole organization. The powerful visualization of my workflow is a blessing because it allows me to have a perfect distraction-fre...
 

Also Known As

Planview LeanKit, LeanKit
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

REA Group, Thompson Reuters
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview AgilePlace vs. Targetprocess and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.