Top 10 Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Alternatives

Name: Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG)
Brand: Sangfor
Rating: 4.0 (3 reviews)

Vendor: Sangfor

4.0 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review Why PeerSpot?

Top Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Umbrella, and Zscaler Internet Access. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) surpasses its competitors by offering secure internet access, advanced threat protection, and comprehensive traffic management, ensuring efficient bandwidth usage and seamless connectivity for enterprises seeking reliable network performance and security.

Sangfor Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sangfor, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate offers robust security features like advanced threat protection and high availability, appealing to security-focused tech buyers. In comparison, Sangfor IAG excels in internet access management and user analytics, attracting those seeking comprehensive application control and cost-effective solutions.

Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate has a moderate setup cost, while Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) offers a more budget-friendly initial outlay.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate has a moderate setup cost, while Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) offers a more budget-friendly initial outlay.

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella excels with advanced threat intelligence and cloud-based security, appealing for simple deployment and effective customer support. In comparison, Sangfor IAG offers extensive web filtering and network management, attracting those seeking comprehensive long-term control despite higher initial costs.

Download Cisco Umbrella vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella setup costs are generally lower compared to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG). Sangfor IAG may involve higher initial investments, highlighting the cost differences between these internet security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access is favored for its affordable cloud-native platform and mobile integration. In comparison, Sangfor IAG stands out for application control and bandwidth management, appealing to organizations needing detailed network control despite the higher upfront investment for hardware-based deployment.

Download Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access features a lower setup cost compared to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG), offering competitive pricing that appeals to budget-conscious users. In contrast, Sangfor IAG provides robust features that may justify its higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE excels in cloud-native security and threat prevention, attracting buyers seeking affordability and strong support. In comparison, Sangfor IAG appeals to those valuing advanced features and network optimization, offering efficient traffic management and enhanced threat intelligence at a long-term cost advantage.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Sangfor Internet Access Gateway generally presents a higher upfront cost due to its extensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Sangfor Internet Access Gateway generally presents a higher upfront cost due to its extensive features.

Skyhigh Security

4.1 out of 5

Skyhigh Security

4.1 out of 5

Skyhigh Security offers advanced threat protection and cloud data security, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Sangfor IAG, known for comprehensive access control and secure web gateway functionalities, suits those valuing seamless integration and extensive security coverage despite its higher cost.

Download Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) vs. Skyhigh Security Report

Pricing

Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.

The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations.

View comparison

Pricing

Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.

The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations.

Cisco Secure Access

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Secure Access

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Secure Access is a comprehensive solution designed to provide secure network access and protect against unauthorized access. It offers a range of features and capabilities that ensure network authentication, enforce access policies, and manage user identities. With its robust security measures, Cisco Secure Access ensures that only authorized users can access the network, preventing any potential security breaches.

Download Cisco Secure Access vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

For what you get, it's a fair price in comparison to other products.

View comparison

Pricing

For what you get, it's a fair price in comparison to other products.

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway

3.9 out of 5

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway

3.9 out of 5

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway's advanced analytics and cloud-based management attract tech buyers seeking robust security analytics. In comparison, Sangfor Internet Access Gateway appeals with comprehensive application control and budget-friendly pricing, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing affordability and ease of deployment.

Download Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG), which reflects differences in initial investment needs and potential value derived from the features offered by each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiProxy

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiProxy

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiProxy excels in robust web filtering, providing efficient customer service with a lower initial setup cost. In comparison, Sangfor IAG is praised for comprehensive application control and bandwidth management features, offering superior network optimization with a higher long-term ROI.

Download Fortinet FortiProxy vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiProxy often involves a lower initial setup cost compared to Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG), providing a more budget-friendly option, while Sangfor IAG frequently offers advanced features that justify its higher upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Web Security Appliance

3.9 out of 5

Cisco Web Security Appliance

3.9 out of 5

Cisco Web Security Appliance appeals to budget-conscious buyers through robust threat defense and cost-efficiency. In comparison, Sangfor IAG offers superior traffic management and an intuitive setup. Cisco's support attracts those needing reliability, while Sangfor's broad feature set justifies its higher initial investment.

Download Cisco Web Security Appliance vs. Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) Report

Pricing

Cisco Web Security Appliance has a higher setup cost than Sangfor Internet Access Gateway, making Sangfor IAG a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Web Security Appliance has a higher setup cost than Sangfor Internet Access Gateway, making Sangfor IAG a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.

Symantec Proxy

3.7 out of 5

Symantec Proxy

3.7 out of 5

Symantec Proxy offers excellent pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with needs for web filtering and data loss prevention. In comparison, Sangfor IAG's feature comprehensiveness, including bandwidth management and VPN integration, attracts those seeking a comprehensive network management solution despite a higher cost.

Download Sangfor Internet Access Gateway (IAG) vs. Symantec Proxy Report

Pricing

Symantec Proxy offers a straightforward setup process, while Sangfor IAG presents a more cost-effective initial setup. Symantec focuses on a streamlined experience, whereas Sangfor highlights budget-friendliness and efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Firewalls

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)