No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Progress MOVEit Logo

Top 10 Progress MOVEit Alternatives

Vendor: Progress Software
4.1 out of 5
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top Progress MOVEit Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Progress MOVEit based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration, and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Progress MOVEit surpasses its competitors by offering secure file transfer, centralized management, and a robust automation platform that ensures data protection and compliance, making it an ideal solution for organizations seeking reliability and efficiency in file transfer operations.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Progress MOVEit Logo
Control-M
4.3 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Control-M
4.3 out of 5
Control-M excels in workload automation, orchestrating workflows, and hybrid integration. In comparison, Progress MOVEit specializes in secure file transfers and data management efficiency. Control-M suits complex environments, while MOVEit targets secure data transfer needs, offering flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Download Control-M vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Control-M setup costs are higher than those for Progress MOVEit, which offers a more budget-friendly option. However, Control-M's advanced features justify its higher setup expense.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Control-M setup costs are higher than those for Progress MOVEit, which offers a more budget-friendly option. However, Control-M's advanced features justify its higher setup expense.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
4.0 out of 5
Progress MOVEit specializes in secure, efficient file transfers with robust encryption, automation, and scheduling features. In comparison, IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration offers versatile integration, supporting multiple e-business standards, making it ideal for complex enterprise environments seeking comprehensive API management.
Download IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit has a competitive setup cost, while IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration demands a higher initial investment. The difference in setup expense highlights their distinct positioning in the market.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit has a competitive setup cost, while IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration demands a higher initial investment. The difference in setup expense highlights their distinct positioning in the market.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite
4.3 out of 5
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite excels in scalability and flexibility, making deployment simple without extensive technical expertise. In comparison, Progress MOVEit stands out with secure file transfer and robust logging, offering a strong choice for environments prioritizing security and detailed auditing of file transfers.
Download Progress MOVEit vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Progress MOVEit, which offers a more affordable initial investment option.
View comparison
Pricing
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Progress MOVEit, which offers a more affordable initial investment option.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks excels in deployment and support, offering seamless integration and robust security protocols. In comparison, Progress MOVEit provides superior automation and advanced encryption. Kiteworks suits those valuing straightforward deployment; Progress MOVEit appeals to those investing in comprehensive, scalable security solutions.
Download Kiteworks vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Kiteworks has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Progress MOVEit offers higher setup costs with advanced features included.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiteworks has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Progress MOVEit offers higher setup costs with advanced features included.
Progress MOVEit Logo
GoAnywhere MFT
4.3 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
GoAnywhere MFT
4.3 out of 5
Progress MOVEit offers robust logging and large file transfer support, ideal for intensive environments. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT excels in workflow automation, reducing manual effort. Both provide comprehensive security, with GoAnywhere MFT offering cost-effective solutions for diverse organizational needs.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit incurs higher setup costs than GoAnywhere MFT, highlighting a price differential that may affect decision-making.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit incurs higher setup costs than GoAnywhere MFT, highlighting a price differential that may affect decision-making.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
ActiveBatch by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit specializes in secure file transfers with strong encryption, ideal for high-security needs. In comparison, ActiveBatch excels in workflow automation with pre-built job steps and integration flexibility, making it suitable for complex systems seeking efficient monitoring and cost-effective solutions.
Download ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit offers competitive setup costs with straightforward deployment, while ActiveBatch by Redwood involves higher initial setup investment due to its extensive feature set and customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit offers competitive setup costs with straightforward deployment, while ActiveBatch by Redwood involves higher initial setup investment due to its extensive feature set and customization options.
Progress MOVEit Logo
VisualCron
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
VisualCron
4.5 out of 5
MOVEit excels in secure, large file transfers and compliance, offering reliable encryption and logging. In comparison, VisualCron provides a user-friendly interface for job scheduling, supporting custom workflows. MOVEit's robust automation suits complex systems, while VisualCron integrates easily with multiple services for accessible automation.
Download Progress MOVEit vs. VisualCron Report
Progress MOVEit involves higher setup costs, while VisualCron offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a significant distinction in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit involves higher setup costs, while VisualCron offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a significant distinction in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway
3.9 out of 5
Progress MOVEit offers user-friendly setup and strong logging, ideal for secure transfers with encryption and automation. In comparison, IBM Sterling File Gateway excels in partner management and large data handling, providing extensive customization options and flexibility for complex protocol management.
Download IBM Sterling File Gateway vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit has a lower setup cost compared to IBM Sterling File Gateway, which requires a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit has a lower setup cost compared to IBM Sterling File Gateway, which requires a more significant initial investment.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer
4.2 out of 5
Axway AMPLIFY excels in file transfer automation, security protocols, and cloud integration, enhancing operational efficiency. In comparison, Progress MOVEit focuses on robust logging, traceability, and straightforward file management. Both solutions offer distinct strengths in their respective areas, suiting various organizational needs.
Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost, while Progress MOVEit offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost, while Progress MOVEit offers a more budget-friendly option.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct
4.1 out of 5
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct offers cost-effective solutions for enterprises prioritizing high-volume data transfers with robust support. In comparison, Progress MOVEit provides advanced encryption and compliance features, appealing to businesses that require comprehensive security, despite its higher initial investment and flexible deployment options.
Download Progress MOVEit vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Report
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has a setup cost that reflects its advanced security features, whereas Progress MOVEit offers a more economical setup option suitable for businesses seeking scalability and usability.
View comparison
Pricing
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has a setup cost that reflects its advanced security features, whereas Progress MOVEit offers a more economical setup option suitable for businesses seeking scalability and usability.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Globalscape EFT
4.1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Globalscape EFT
4.1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit handles large file transfers efficiently, offering detailed logging, encryption, and automation. In comparison, Globalscape EFT excels in integration and workflow capabilities, with user-friendly security features, making it ideal for centralized management and automation.
Download Globalscape EFT vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit offers an affordable initial setup cost, while Globalscape EFT has a higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit offers an affordable initial setup cost, while Globalscape EFT has a higher setup expense.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Flux
5.0 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Flux
5.0 out of 5
Progress MOVEit attracts budget-conscious tech buyers with its straightforward deployment and efficient operation. In comparison, Flux appeals to those valuing advanced integration and customizability, despite its higher setup costs, offering significant long-term savings through its extensive capabilities and deep technical support.
Download Flux vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit requires an upfront setup cost, whereas Flux offers a more economical setup. This highlights a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit requires an upfront setup cost, whereas Flux offers a more economical setup. This highlights a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
Aspera Managed File Transfer
3.5 out of 5
Aspera Managed File Transfer offers budget-friendly pricing and high-speed transfers appealing to organizations with large data needs. In comparison, Progress MOVEit provides advanced security and automation features, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing robust data management and compliance.
Download Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Aspera Managed File Transfer's setup cost is higher, reflecting its robust features, while Progress MOVEit offers a more economical option, appealing to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Aspera Managed File Transfer's setup cost is higher, reflecting its robust features, while Progress MOVEit offers a more economical option, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Progress MOVEit Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit offers robust encryption and logging, ideal for large file transfers. In comparison, JSCAPE excels with protocol support and high-speed transfers. MOVEit provides strong automation, whereas JSCAPE's flexibility and seamless integration appeal to varied deployment needs. Pricing may influence a tech buyer's choice.
Download JSCAPE by Redwood vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas JSCAPE by Redwood requires higher setup fees, highlighting a significant difference in initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas JSCAPE by Redwood requires higher setup fees, highlighting a significant difference in initial financial commitment.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
TIBCO Managed File Transfer
3.8 out of 5
Progress MOVEit attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, ease of deployment, and strong automation focus. In comparison, TIBCO Managed File Transfer is appealing for its robust features, advanced integration capabilities, and comprehensive support, making it ideal for organizations seeking depth over cost savings.
Download Progress MOVEit vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer Report
Progress MOVEit involves a higher setup cost compared to TIBCO Managed File Transfer, reflecting the advanced capabilities and comprehensive support offered by MOVEit, while TIBCO remains more budget-friendly with a simpler setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit involves a higher setup cost compared to TIBCO Managed File Transfer, reflecting the advanced capabilities and comprehensive support offered by MOVEit, while TIBCO remains more budget-friendly with a simpler setup process.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Files.com
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Files.com
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit offers strong encryption and automation, ideal for secure, intricate file transfers. In comparison, Files.com provides seamless integration and simplicity, suiting diverse environments. Buyers may prefer MOVEit for security or Files.com for ease of use and cloud flexibility.
Download Files.com vs. Progress MOVEit Report
Progress MOVEit incurs higher setup costs, while Files.com offers a streamlined setup with lower initial expenses, making Files.com more cost-effective at the outset.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit incurs higher setup costs, while Files.com offers a streamlined setup with lower initial expenses, making Files.com more cost-effective at the outset.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Thru
4.0 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Thru
4.0 out of 5
Progress MOVEit appeals to enterprises with its strong security and automation. In comparison, Thru attracts buyers with superior integration options and adaptability. MOVEit's lower costs benefit budgets, while Thru’s higher ROI justifies its expense for those prioritizing long-term features.
Progress MOVEit incurs a medium setup cost while Thru offers a free setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit incurs a medium setup cost while Thru offers a free setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
CA XCOM Data Transport
1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit offers competitive pricing and strong customer support, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, CA XCOM Data Transport provides extensive features and integration options, attracting enterprises needing scalability and willing to invest for higher functionality.
Progress MOVEit setup costs are competitive and straightforward, while CA XCOM Data Transport involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in affordability for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit setup costs are competitive and straightforward, while CA XCOM Data Transport involves a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in affordability for budget-conscious organizations.
Progress MOVEit Logo
CompleteFTP
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
CompleteFTP
4.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit offers secure file transfer with automation and compliance, presenting cost-effective solutions with strong support. In comparison, CompleteFTP provides advanced authentication and protocol support, making it suitable for flexible integration in demanding environments, despite a higher initial investment.
Progress MOVEit has a higher setup cost, offering advanced features, while CompleteFTP provides a more budget-friendly option with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit has a higher setup cost, offering advanced features, while CompleteFTP provides a more budget-friendly option with essential functionalities.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Adobe SendNow
1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Adobe SendNow
1 out of 5
Adobe SendNow emphasizes efficient file sharing and easy deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Progress MOVEit, though more complex and pricier, offers superior automation and security, attracting those needing robust data transfer control and long-term value.
Adobe SendNow offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, while Progress MOVEit requires a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe SendNow offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, while Progress MOVEit requires a higher setup investment.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
Fortra's Globalscape WAFS
2.0 out of 5
Progress MOVEit stands out for its automation features and lower costs, offering a secure and efficient file transfer solution. In comparison, Fortra's Globalscape WAFS attracts tech buyers with its advanced synchronization capabilities, providing seamless file sharing across multiple locations despite higher initial costs.
Progress MOVEit has a simple setup cost structure focusing on essential features, while Fortra's Globalscape WAFS has a higher initial investment with additional services offered.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit has a simple setup cost structure focusing on essential features, while Fortra's Globalscape WAFS has a higher initial investment with additional services offered.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Diplomat MFT
1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit Logo
Diplomat MFT
1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit emphasizes affordability and ease of deployment, appealing to resource-constrained businesses. In comparison, Diplomat MFT attracts enterprises seeking advanced security and extensive features, providing a higher ROI through comprehensive capabilities and customization, making it suitable for complex business environments despite its higher cost.
Progress MOVEit setup is cost-effective with straightforward pricing, while Diplomat MFT tends to have higher initial setup costs. Users often highlight the value of MOVEit's scalability compared to Diplomat MFT's more rigid licensing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit setup is cost-effective with straightforward pricing, while Diplomat MFT tends to have higher initial setup costs. Users often highlight the value of MOVEit's scalability compared to Diplomat MFT's more rigid licensing structure.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
3.5 out of 5
Progress MOVEit prioritizes data security and compliance, attracting enterprises focused on risk reduction. In comparison, SolarWinds Serv-U emphasizes configuration flexibility, appealing to those needing diverse protocol support. MOVEit offers strong customer service, while SolarWinds Serv-U delivers adaptable setup aligned with budget-conscious configurations.
Progress MOVEit involves an initial setup cost suitable for organizations prioritizing advanced security features, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server offers a budget-friendly setup appealing to users seeking straightforward file transfer capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit involves an initial setup cost suitable for organizations prioritizing advanced security features, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server offers a budget-friendly setup appealing to users seeking straightforward file transfer capabilities.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
WingFTP Managed File Transfer
1 out of 5
WingFTP Managed File Transfer offers cost-effective solutions with versatile file management and automation. In comparison, Progress MOVEit provides comprehensive features, advanced reporting, and compliance for sensitive data handling. Businesses may choose WingFTP for affordability or MOVEit for its extensive integrations and long-term value.
WingFTP Managed File Transfer offers affordable setup costs, while Progress MOVEit requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WingFTP Managed File Transfer offers affordable setup costs, while Progress MOVEit requires a higher initial investment.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
Oracle MFT Cloud Service
1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit provides cost-effective solutions with secure automation and excellent customer support. In comparison, Oracle MFT Cloud Service delivers advanced integration and scalability for complex environments, making it ideal for enterprises seeking extended features and long-term integration benefits.
Progress MOVEit involves a significant initial setup cost, which contrasts with Oracle MFT Cloud Service's more affordable setup structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit involves a significant initial setup cost, which contrasts with Oracle MFT Cloud Service's more affordable setup structure.
Progress MOVEit Logo
Progress MOVEit Logo
Acronis MassTransit
1 out of 5
Progress MOVEit excels in security and ease of use, ideal for companies prioritizing these features. In comparison, Acronis MassTransit offers high-speed transfers and scalability suitable for robust enterprise needs. MOVEit is more cost-effective, while MassTransit justifies its premium pricing with advanced capabilities.
Progress MOVEit requires a moderate initial investment with flexible pricing, while Acronis MassTransit has higher upfront costs due to comprehensive setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress MOVEit requires a moderate initial investment with flexible pricing, while Acronis MassTransit has higher upfront costs due to comprehensive setup fees.

Related categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Process Automation
Workload Automation