| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) | 14.7% |
| Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) | 22.3% |
| Microsoft App-V | 18.0% |
| Other | 45.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Virtualization | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Microsoft App-V | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Microsoft Virtual Server | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware Workstation | 4.4 | N/A | 93% | 57 interviewsAdd to research |
| Workspace ONE UEM | 4.0 | N/A | 84% | 102 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 107 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 57 |
| Large Enterprise | 125 |
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) was previously known as Parallels RAS.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| CEO at Etcetera Networks | 4.5 | I recommend Parallels RAS for its cost-effectiveness and ease of setup for remote work. It allows secure access across devices, includes necessary components in a monthly fee, and integrates well with Mac and Windows. Reducing Microsoft dependency would be beneficial. |
| Senior Presales Engineer at CenterTools Software GmbH | 3.5 | I find Parallels Remote Application Server suitable for remote applications and desktops due to its powerful speed and performance, though it is costly. Before using RAS, I used Citrix and Microsoft RDP. Improvements in pricing would be beneficial. |
| Business Owner at Yada Group Services | 4.5 | I use Parallels Remote Application Server to access remote desktop applications and enjoy its strong security features and reliability. While ROI is favorable, the application virtualization feature needs improvement. Compared to others, it offers great pricing and quick deployment on AWS. |
| Datacenter Engineer at Freelancer | 5.0 | I use Parallels for secure, browser-based app publishing, preferring its simplicity and cost over Citrix. It's stable, but needs agent fail-over to prevent lost sessions. Despite initial complexity, its value and higher-level support are excellent, earning it a 10/10. |
| System administrator at a construction company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | We use Parallels Remote Application Server as a VDI for client portal sharing, allowing simultaneous access for employees and clients. It efficiently provisions servers without third-party tools, unlike Citrix, but lacks SQL reporting and support for certain hypervisors. |
| Managing Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I use this solution for enterprise remote control; its HTML5 Client is valuable, offering good stability after setup. While scalable, it needs technical knowledge. I dislike the subscription model but rate it 9/10. |
| CEO at Etcetera Networks | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Solution consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 5.0 | I find this cloud solution very affordable and easy to use, with good performance and excellent support. Its stability and scalability are great. However, local support in Mexico and automated migration from other platforms need improvement. |
