AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus provides a threat intelligence service with flexible pricing options tailored for enterprises. Users report that pricing varies based on the scale and specific requirements of the deployment. Basic packages cover essential features, while advanced tiers offer enhanced capabilities and integrations, leading to higher costs. Potential buyers should prepare for costs that align with their network size and security needs.
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus was previously known as Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management.
Telkom Indonesia
I use the Firewall version. I create and correct rules, and configure networks. I also handle logs.
We have rules, monitoring capabilities, and the ability to add devices. These devices are our own equipment or appliances. The solution helps us show logs and provide firewall functionality.
The logs are particularly useful. The feature helps block traffic from the Internet.
I find its performance to be very impressive. Palo Alto is a leader in security, and we have the most technology in cybersecurity. We have advanced persistent threat detection (APC) and various other features that are highly beneficial.
There is room for improvement in the pricing model.
For additional features, maybe Palo Alto could improve their documentation. It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution. Currently, the documentation is not very comprehensive, and there isn't much information available. Sometimes it's difficult to understand how to use it.
I have been working with it for four months.
I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. In my organization, there are a lot of customers who use this solution on their network. We use it extensively in our organization. Moreover, we plan on increasing further usage.
The initial setup is good. Installation wasn't difficult, but it's challenging to have a truly enjoyable experience. For instance, there is no free trial available for testing purposes.
I would rate it a five out of ten. It took only one day to deploy the solution.
The deployment was solely done in my lab environment. Our team took care of the process. I believe that configuring the network for internet access and establishing necessary security measures are the most crucial steps. We need to configure everything, such as IPSec and firewall rules.
Now, it's only me who handles both the deployment and maintenance.
It is expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. There are no additional costs.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. It is a good product and has all the necessary functionalities.
