Cybersixgill vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cybersixgill and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. Cybersixgill is ranked #23, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.0. Cybersixgill holds a 1.7% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybersixgill users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Cybersixgill

Read 4 Cybersixgill reviews

1,692 Views
880 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews

1,321 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cybersixgill

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Cybersixgill and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus compete in the cybersecurity solutions market. Cybersixgill has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is preferred for its features and overall value.

What features are offered by Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill provides real-time threat intelligence, automated alerts, and excellent support. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus offers comprehensive threat analysis, advanced integration capabilities, and in-depth security insights.

What areas of improvement can be found in Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill could improve integration with other security tools, user interface, and customizability. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus may benefit from enhancements in data processing speed, a more user-friendly UI, and better cost efficiency.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, while easy to deploy, requires more initial configuration. Both offer excellent customer support but Cybersixgill’s simplicity in deployment offers an advantage.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill is praised for its cost-effectiveness and strong ROI. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has a higher setup cost but justifies it with significant ROI due to advanced features. Cybersixgill is ideal for budget-conscious users, while AutoFocus appeals to those seeking feature-rich solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybersixgill

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

23rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (58th), Digital Risk Protection (10th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (30th)

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

17th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Cybersixgill is 1.7%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	1.2%
Cybersixgill	1.7%
Other	97.1%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1528356

Lead Cyber Threat-Intelligence Analyst at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees

Provides early detection of imminent attacks, and speeds up addressing of vulnerabilities internally because it makes them real

They're a newer company, so they're working on their UI a lot. Sometimes the UI is a little glitchy. They're working on different things and making efforts, so that's totally forgivable. But regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries. Step-by-step videos would be useful, instead of a book of instructions, because they're a new tool. They're now getting to the point where video training would be useful, or even live training. More digestible video instructions or opportunities for training, so that you actually learn hands-on, would help.

Read full review

Reviewer921606

Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Seamless integration into existing ecosystem empowers effective threat detection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is its seamless integration into the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, allowing the threat intelligence feeds to be automatically consumed without manual effort. It uses the STIX format, which is automatically understood by the firewalls. AutoFocus also excels in behavioral analytics and reputation scoring, providing thorough threat analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution’s approach of using limited open source intelligence and focusing, instead, on the Deep Web and Dark Web is what seals the deal. That is why I like them. I have other tools that I can aggregate all the open source intelligence from. I value Cybersixgill because it provides access to things that no one else does."

"They also provide some of the greatest notification capabilities. I put in a customer's company name and domain names, or sometimes I put in their IP addresses as a keyword. Once Sixgill collects information that includes those keywords, they then provide us email notifications. That means we can catch information related to our customers as soon as possible."

"The advanced analysis has made our security operations more efficient. It has also potentially given us quicker access to data that we might not have otherwise located."

"To be diligent for the customer, we usually go into Cybersixgill Investigative Portal to analyze and search things. The solution tells us the reputation of cyber threat actors. So, if someone has a reputation of one, it is a really bad idea to care about what that person is saying. However, if you find someone with a reputation of nine, then there is a high probability that we need to address the problem. You can get information about these type of actors in Cybersixgill Investigative Portal. They have a huge collection, which is like having the rules/goals of the dark web and deep web without having to go there. Our analysts avoid going dark web because they have Cybersixgill Investigative Portal and can get the news from their browser, searching wherever they want."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."

Cons

"Sixgill has strong capabilities based on search queries, but there is some difficulty in using Sixgill. Their querying is very powerful but it can be difficult. It's not hugely complex but you need some skill to use Sixgill querying."

"The breadth of access to data is good, but there are gaps. More data would be my suggestion because the platform is good and I have no complaints about the system. I think it is just a case of always trying to get more data sources."

"Regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries."

"We need real-time updated information. If we could have this, it would be amazing. For example, if someone was posting something, then ten second later, it was on the platform. Sometimes, it takes a minute or hours right now, depending on the forum."

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors."

"The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good."

"The pricing and licensing are good. It is expensive for us because the US dollar is quite strong compared to our dollar. Otherwise, it is quite reasonable for what it is. All the tools in the market are around the same price from my experience."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"It is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

15%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...

See all answers

Comparisons

Recorded Future vs Cybersixgill

Compared 30% of the time

Flashpoint Intelligence Platform vs Cybersixgill

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybersixgill

Compared 6% of the time

CyberInt Argos vs Cybersixgill

Compared 6% of the time

Digital Shadows vs Cybersixgill

Compared 6% of the time

More Cybersixgill Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 18% of the time

Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 16% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill

January 2026

Download Cybersixgill product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

December 2025

Download Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report

Also Known As

No data available

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management

Overview

Cybersixgill offers real-time, automated threat intelligence solutions to combat cybercrime, detect phishing, data leaks, fraud, and vulnerabilities while enhancing incident response capabilities for organizations.

Cybersixgill provides security teams with contextual, actionable alerts and covert investigation capabilities through its Investigative Portal. Powered by the deepest data lake of dark web activities, users can receive customized, real-time alerts. The service facilitates in-depth investigations with a comprehensive view of threats and enables profiling of threat actors, with analysis across multiple parameters including language, sites, and timeframes. Its cloud-based access supports organizations in identifying and mitigating risks effectively.

What features make Cybersixgill stand out?

Deep Web Intelligence: Access unmatched data from closed forums and unique sources.
Customizable Alerts: Receive tailored alerts specific to organizational needs.
Comprehensive Search Engine: Explore extensive databases with flexible queries.
Automatic Translations: Instantly translate content across different languages.
Threat Actor Analysis: Research profiles, methods, and histories of cyber threats.
Credential Tracking: Save time with efficient tracking tools.
Scalability: Efficiently monitor and analyze threats without excessive manpower.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automate threat tracking without extensive resource demands.
Unique Data Access: Gain insights unavailable through other platforms.
Enhanced Risk Assessment: Comprehensive threat profiles aid in proactive security.
Improved Threat Monitoring: Monitor dark web activities effectively.
Flexibility: Adapt search and analysis to specific security scenarios.

In industries where cyber intelligence and risk assessment are critical, such as finance and retail, Cybersixgill enables organizations to gather intelligence and monitor threats. Many use it to track illegal activities like credit card fraud on the dark web and assess threats to client operations. Its Investigative Portal provides insights into emerging malware trends and underground activities, supporting proactive threat management strategies.

Cybersixgill

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Current customers include large enterprises, financial services, manufacturing, GSIs, MSSPs, government and law enforcement entities.

Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Free Report: Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.