Cybersixgill vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cybersixgill and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. Cybersixgill is ranked #21, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Cybersixgill holds a 2.2% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybersixgill users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Cybersixgill

Read 4 Cybersixgill reviews

917 Views
358 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Read 6 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews

1,095 Views
188 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cybersixgill

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Cybersixgill and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus compete in the cybersecurity solutions market. Cybersixgill has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is preferred for its features and overall value.

What features are offered by Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill provides real-time threat intelligence, automated alerts, and excellent support. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus offers comprehensive threat analysis, advanced integration capabilities, and in-depth security insights.

What areas of improvement can be found in Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill could improve integration with other security tools, user interface, and customizability. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus may benefit from enhancements in data processing speed, a more user-friendly UI, and better cost efficiency.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, while easy to deploy, requires more initial configuration. Both offer excellent customer support but Cybersixgill’s simplicity in deployment offers an advantage.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Cybersixgill in comparison to Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

Cybersixgill is praised for its cost-effectiveness and strong ROI. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has a higher setup cost but justifies it with significant ROI due to advanced features. Cybersixgill is ideal for budget-conscious users, while AutoFocus appeals to those seeking feature-rich solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybersixgill

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (66th), Digital Risk Protection (6th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (29th)

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Cybersixgill is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1528356

Lead Cyber Threat-Intelligence Analyst at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees

Provides early detection of imminent attacks, and speeds up addressing of vulnerabilities internally because it makes them real

They're a newer company, so they're working on their UI a lot. Sometimes the UI is a little glitchy. They're working on different things and making efforts, so that's totally forgivable. But regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries. Step-by-step videos would be useful, instead of a book of instructions, because they're a new tool. They're now getting to the point where video training would be useful, or even live training. More digestible video instructions or opportunities for training, so that you actually learn hands-on, would help.

Read full review

RichPhillips

Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies

The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information. The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies. I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They also provide some of the greatest notification capabilities. I put in a customer's company name and domain names, or sometimes I put in their IP addresses as a keyword. Once Sixgill collects information that includes those keywords, they then provide us email notifications. That means we can catch information related to our customers as soon as possible."

"The solution’s approach of using limited open source intelligence and focusing, instead, on the Deep Web and Dark Web is what seals the deal. That is why I like them. I have other tools that I can aggregate all the open source intelligence from. I value Cybersixgill because it provides access to things that no one else does."

"The advanced analysis has made our security operations more efficient. It has also potentially given us quicker access to data that we might not have otherwise located."

"To be diligent for the customer, we usually go into Cybersixgill Investigative Portal to analyze and search things. The solution tells us the reputation of cyber threat actors. So, if someone has a reputation of one, it is a really bad idea to care about what that person is saying. However, if you find someone with a reputation of nine, then there is a high probability that we need to address the problem. You can get information about these type of actors in Cybersixgill Investigative Portal. They have a huge collection, which is like having the rules/goals of the dark web and deep web without having to go there. Our analysts avoid going dark web because they have Cybersixgill Investigative Portal and can get the news from their browser, searching wherever they want."

"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

Cons

"The breadth of access to data is good, but there are gaps. More data would be my suggestion because the platform is good and I have no complaints about the system. I think it is just a case of always trying to get more data sources."

"Regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries."

"We need real-time updated information. If we could have this, it would be amazing. For example, if someone was posting something, then ten second later, it was on the platform. Sometimes, it takes a minute or hours right now, depending on the forum."

"Sixgill has strong capabilities based on search queries, but there is some difficulty in using Sixgill. Their querying is very powerful but it can be difficult. It's not hugely complex but you need some skill to use Sixgill querying."

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are good. It is expensive for us because the US dollar is quite strong compared to our dollar. Otherwise, it is quite reasonable for what it is. All the tools in the market are around the same price from my experience."

"The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good."

"Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors."

"It is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

While Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is effective, I always prefer to have a second source of threat intelligence feed to ensure coverage for zero-day vulnerabilities that might be missed. This is mo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus ( /products/palo-alto-networks-autofocus-reviews ) for threat intelligence. Palo Alto Networks has its own threat intelligence team, Unit 42, which analyzes submi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Recorded Future vs Cybersixgill

Compared 74% of the time

Digital Shadows vs Cybersixgill

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Cybersixgill

Compared 8% of the time

CyberInt Argos vs Cybersixgill

Compared 8% of the time

More Cybersixgill Competitors

Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 41% of the time

Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 34% of the time

Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 25% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill

June 2025

Download Cybersixgill product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms

May 2025

Download Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report

Also Known As

No data available

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management

Overview

Cybersixgill empowers organizations with cyber intelligence by monitoring open sources and dark web activities, tracking threat exposure, and assessing risks without on-premises infrastructure.

Cybersixgill enables powerful intelligence gathering by providing access to a comprehensive data lake of deep and dark web activity, identifying trends in malware, and analyzing underground markets. Organizations can monitor illegal activities like credit card sales and conduct searches on hacker forums using its API and Investigative Portal. Automatic translations and alerts enhance threat detection, making it a vital tool for real-time cybersecurity management. Users have expressed a desire for better real-time updates and improved data source coverage along with more user-friendly query specificity and training materials.

What are the key features of Cybersixgill?

Investigative Portal: Empowers teams with contextual, actionable alerts and covert investigation capabilities.
Data Lake: Leverages the largest collection of deep and dark web activity for comprehensive threat analysis.
Advanced Search: Utilizes operators for specific queries and tracking leaked credentials efficiently.
Real-time Alerts: Provides instant notifications customized to organizational needs.
Threat Actor Profiling: Examines profiles, methods, and histories to understand risks comprehensively.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Time Savings: Streamlined information gathering reduces the need for multiple analysts.
Risk Mitigation: Identifying threats early lowers potential impacts and enhances security posture.
Enhanced Coverage: Broad access to deep and dark web data enriches intelligence capabilities.
Return on Investment: Effective threat detection and response minimize potential losses.

Cybersixgill's cybersecurity solutions are critical in sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail where sensitive data protection is paramount. Organizations leverage the platform to proactively detect threats and safeguard customer information, significantly reducing the risk of data breaches and fraud while maintaining industry compliance.

Cybersixgill

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Current customers include large enterprises, financial services, manufacturing, GSIs, MSSPs, government and law enforcement entities.

Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

June 2025

Free Report: Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybersixgill vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.