Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cyware and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. Cyware is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #29. Cyware holds a 1.1% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Cyware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Cyware Cyber Fusion
Read 2 Cyware Cyber Fusion reviews
  • 842 Views
  • 438 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews
  • 1,282 Views
  • 1,051 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cyware Cyber Fusion and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cyware Cyber Fusion
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
27th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (21st)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
29th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Cyware Cyber Fusion is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedKonsowa - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution with excellent features and a helpful technical support team
We use the solution for cyber fusion centers The product has a lot of strong points compared to other tools. The prices must be reduced. I have been using the solution for one year. I am using the latest version of the solution. I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. In my company,…
Read full review
RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technical support team is helpful."
"The product is stable."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
 

Cons

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."
"The prices must be reduced."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is expensive."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Healthcare Company
8%
Performing Arts
12%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cyware Security Orchestration Layer?
The technical support team is helpful.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cyware Security Orchestration Layer?
The solution is not expensive, but it is not cheap. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cyware Security Orchestration Layer?
The prices must be reduced.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cyware Cyber Fusion Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cyware Cyber Fusion
Compared 33% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cyware Cyber Fusion Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cyware Cyber Fusion
Compared 17% of the time
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion
Compared 13% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion
Compared 13% of the time
Anomali vs Cyware Cyber Fusion Logo
Anomali vs Cyware Cyber Fusion
Compared 12% of the time
More Cyware Cyber Fusion Competitors
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 36% of the time
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 36% of the time
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 29% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
July 2025
Cyware Cyber Fusion reportDownload Cyware Cyber Fusion product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
July 2025
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reportDownload Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report
 

Also Known As

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)
Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
 

Overview

More than just a security automation tool, Cyber Fusion unites threat intel and SOAR to automate any security tool, orchestrate any environment, and collaborate across any boundary, to yield more intelligent threat response.

Cyware

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
July 2025
Free Report: Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Find out what your peers are saying about Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.