Cyware Cyber Fusion vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cyware Cyber Fusion

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

28th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (22nd)

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

17th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Cyware Cyber Fusion is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	1.2%
Cyware Cyber Fusion	1.4%
Other	97.4%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2342886

Director of Cyber Security APAC at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

The threat emails are not tailored to our company, though the product is stable

The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The solution must be able to provide threat feeds. We shouldn’t have to rely on third parties and pay for additional licenses. The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow. It is our main ticketing platform.

Read full review

reviewer9216065

Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Seamless integration into existing ecosystem empowers effective threat detection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is its seamless integration into the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, allowing the threat intelligence feeds to be automatically consumed without manual effort. It uses the STIX format, which is automatically understood by the firewalls. AutoFocus also excels in behavioral analytics and reputation scoring, providing thorough threat analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable."

"The technical support team is helpful."

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."

"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."

"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."

Cons

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."

"The prices must be reduced."

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Performing Arts

15%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

The product is stable.

What needs improvement with Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

What is your primary use case for Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

We use the solution for the correlation of threat feeds and reporting.

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 14% of the time

Anomali vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 13% of the time

ThreatQ vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 11% of the time

More Cyware Cyber Fusion Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 18% of the time

Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 16% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors

Product Reports

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Download Cyware Cyber Fusion product report

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Download Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report

Also Known As

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management

Overview

More than just a security automation tool, Cyber Fusion unites threat intel and SOAR to automate any security tool, orchestrate any environment, and collaborate across any boundary, to yield more intelligent threat response.

Cyware

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Telkom Indonesia

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus