Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse offers high performance and usability with seamless SQL Server integration, handling large data efficiently with a user-friendly interface. Known for its cost-effectiveness and robust security, it excels in integrating data across Microsoft ecosystem.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse | 2.9% |
| Snowflake | 9.5% |
| Teradata | 8.8% |
| Other | 78.8% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Data Warehouse | Apr 26, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs Snowflake | Apr 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs Oracle Exadata | Apr 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs Teradata | Apr 26, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata | 4.1 | 8.8% | 88% | 83 interviewsAdd to research |
| Snowflake | 4.2 | 9.5% | 97% | 104 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 48 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse efficiently manages large datasets from diverse sources, supporting a unified data approach. Its integration with SQL Server and compatibility with tools like Qlik enhances data management and decision-making capabilities. With impressive scalability and security features, it is widely used in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and logistics for analytics and reporting. However, users seek improvements in integration with non-Microsoft layers, memory usage, SQL configuration, and scalability.
What are the key features of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?In industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse supports analytics, reporting, and decision-making processes. Organizations utilize it to maintain historical data, develop business intelligence models, and create actionable dashboards, benefiting from its integration with key tools and efficient data management.
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse was previously known as Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse.
Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| CEO at Smart Data-Driven Solutions | 3.5 | I've used Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse intermittently over the years; it's stable and integrates well with Azure, handles massive data loads, and has cost-saving features, but it's expensive and could benefit from dynamic scaling capabilities. |
| Associate Director at Sequentis | 4.5 | I am a consultant and prefer Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse for its intuitive integration and frequent feature updates. It significantly enhances data analytics, inventory management, and marketing processes, although frequent patch releases can disrupt business due to required server reboots. |
| Service Desk Administrator at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse for two years, finding it fast, scalable, and well-integrated with Azure. Setup was easy, support is solid, though pricing recently increased. Overall, it's reliable for handling large datasets in our hybrid cloud setup. |
| Architecture at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse for optimizing logistics SQL queries, specifically for truck loading and unloading. It's integrated with BI, mobile, and IoT solutions, proving valuable but expensive. Adjusting its pricing could enhance its appeal. |
| Computer engineer at a engineering company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse to construct and manage a data warehouse through SQL queries. The interface is user-friendly and efficient, but performance slows significantly with many users or expensive queries. I have not tried any other similar solutions. |
| Sr. Data Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | We utilize Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse for building our data warehouse and databases, benefiting from its scalability and many features. However, table statistics need improvement, sometimes requiring manual updates. Despite this, it provides a 100% return on investment. |
| BI/Data Warehouse Analyst at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | We primarily use Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse with SQL Server and Visual Studio in the health industry. Its stability and ease of use are highlights, although the ETL process could be more efficient. The columnstore index enhances performance significantly. |
| Senior Software Engineer at Eurofins | 4.0 | In my company, we use Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse to manage multi-location data loading in France. The SQL Server commands are invaluable for writing and calling stored procedures, though we've shifted to Azure Cloud for enhanced performance over SSIS. |