Rapid7 Metasploit Reviews

Rapid7 Metasploit proves valuable by identifying system vulnerabilities and potential upgrades. It efficiently saves time, especially in web testing and VIPD projects, leading to cost reductions. For organizations new to vulnerability assessment, ROI is swift. In contrast, those with experience or using other tools like Qualys or Nessus find the ROI satisfactory.

Enterprise users indicate varied experiences with Rapid7 Metasploit's pricing and licensing. Many start with the free version due to its robust community support. While some find the cost reasonable, nearly competitive with Nessus, others consider it expensive. The commercial version involves a significant upfront fee and annual support costs. Despite cost concerns, users appreciate its integration with InsightVM, offering an attractive suite for penetration testing. Pricing disputes often lead organizations to seek alternative solutions.

• "The cost is approximately $15 per device."
• "I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."
• "Rapid7 Metasploit is an open-source solution."

Organizations primarily use Rapid7 Metasploit for penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, and exploitation. It aids in identifying vulnerabilities, automating scanning and testing, and enhancing security measures. Utilized in various environments including governmental and corporate settings, Rapid7 Metasploit is leveraged for phishing detection, network penetration activities, and vulnerability management. Users often integrate it with other systems like Kali Linux and utilize it for tasks like process automation, attack prevention, and vulnerability validation.

Customer support for Rapid7 Metasploit varies. Some users find technical support responsive and helpful, while others experience delays. Online resources are beneficial, but direct contact can be unpredictable. The free version lacks official support but has an active community. Paid versions offer better service. Development is active, yet some find Rapid7 less reliable than others like Cisco or Tenable. Despite mixed experiences, open-source materials help resolve many issues.

Initial setup of Rapid7 Metasploit is often straightforward and easy. Many users find the installation quick, taking between five and thirty minutes. Some highlight that technical knowledge aids in smooth installation, while others encountered challenges. Some needed to uninstall antivirus or adjust firewall settings. Ratings vary from six to ten out of ten for ease. When deploying, users appreciate that it doesn't require maintenance post-installation and can be managed by a single person.

Many believe Rapid7 Metasploit has room for improvement in scalability, with varied opinions. Some find it effective for their projects, especially in small teams or on-premises setups, while others doubt its ability to scale without automation. A few users rate its scalability highly, mentioning it meets specific needs well, yet concurrent licensing can limit simultaneous use. Expansion may be possible but could require enhancements for larger deployments or hybrid environments.

Many users find Rapid7 Metasploit stable, with recent updates improving issues from earlier versions. Multiple reports mention no bugs or crashes, and it receives high stability ratings, often 8 or 9 out of 10. Some still see room for improvement, rating it 5 or 7 out of 10. A few users note that external network issues can impact performance, but generally, it is considered a robust and reliable tool.