Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Kemp LoadMaster?

Featured Kemp LoadMaster reviews

Kemp LoadMaster mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 6.9%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kemp LoadMaster6.9%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)15.4%
NetScaler13.8%
Other63.9%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on Kemp LoadMaster reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Dec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonKemp LoadMaster vs NetScalerDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonKemp LoadMaster vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Dec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonKemp LoadMaster vs HAProxyDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Imperva Application Security Platform4.3N/A95%133 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.77.2%79%49 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business127
Midsize Enterprise96
Large Enterprise208
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Hospitality Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Kemp LoadMaster with alternative products

Learn more about Kemp LoadMaster

Kemp LoadMaster customers

Related questions

 
Kemp LoadMaster Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Information Security Engineer at BOK4.5I used Trend Micro Deep Security mainly for virtual patching and IPS on critical servers, and Kemp LoadMaster was easy to set up but had licensing challenges that led us to stop using it despite its good performance.
Associate Engineer at AST4.0I use Kemp LoadMaster primarily for its effective security and improved traffic distribution performance. However, update challenges, slow support, and lacking features like DDoS mitigation limit its capabilities. I’m considering F5 for its broader range of features.
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees5.0I use Kemp LoadMaster to replace Microsoft Forefront Threat Management Gateway and balance loads for various applications, including Microsoft Exchange and SQL Server. Its Edge Security Pack is valuable, but better TCP packet reporting is needed. I haven't compared it with Citrix NetScaler.
IT Director at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5No summary available
General Manager at Seriti Resources4.5I use Kemp LoadMaster for application load balancing and find it easy to deploy and understand. However, I struggle with pulling a specific server and redirecting IPs, as the DevOps features and knowledge base need improvement.
System Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I installed the Kemp LoadMaster as recommended by Microsoft for a major customer to front an exchange platform. While it offers numerous features, we only utilize a small fraction. Initial cluster setup issues were resolved over time.
Owner at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees4.5My primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster is load balancing, especially with various algorithms. However, the layer seven load balancing for web servers needs improvement as it struggles with application-level issues. Previously, we used Microsoft's inbuilt network load balancer.
Owner at Optiwan5.0No summary available