Kemp LoadMaster vs Uplynk comparison

Read 7 Uplynk reviews

5,411 Views
2,164 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kemp LoadMaster and Uplynk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Kemp LoadMaster vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: September 2026).

Kemp LoadMaster vs. Uplynk

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

27th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (12th)

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

28th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (6th), CDN (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kemp LoadMaster	1.3%
Uplynk	1.5%
Other	97.2%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

IshtiaqKhalil

Information Security Engineer at BOK

Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges

The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management

Read full review

AliKhalil

manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable live streaming has increased our continuous viewership and maintained audience trust

Uplynk is deployed in my organization on-premises and is fully on-site. Uplynk supports our business continuity or disaster recovery plans because it's really well protected and it doesn't lag or crash when there's a spike in all areas. Uplynk helps us comply with regulatory requirements in our industry by keeping us live. Uplynk integrates really well with other systems or tools we use. You need a whole team to really run Uplynk because there are so many moving pieces, the code, the app, and other components. My experience with Uplynk's analytics or reporting capabilities is that they are especially helpful to update the teams and our stakeholders. I would describe Uplynk's flexibility or customization options as really easy, really customizable, and it integrates in many areas. Uplynk helps me deliver content to different devices or platforms by allowing us to upload on and stay live on tablets, computers, and televisions. It allows us to stay live to get those viewerships. Uplynk is a software that saves time, but you need a solid team to run Uplynk to ensure viewership and everything is moving because there are many pieces to keep. I advise others looking into using Uplynk that it takes many different areas: coding, integration, APIs, and all that. It takes a team to run it, and you need to be a big company. If you're streaming and doing all that at a big scale, use it. If you're on a smaller scale, Uplynk is going to be really hard for you to manage. It's not something that's simple; just use the ones that are basic out there if you're an influencer and things like that. I would rate this product a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the Kemp LoadMaster has been an all-rounder great product and stable."

"The most valuable features for us are the Load Balancing and Web Application Firewall, as we have a lot of web applications."

"Mitigates content security policy issues."

"Its a nice and easy NLB to set up and operate on a day to day basis."

"Overall, the product has covered what we needed and even offered some additional features."

"It's been a great reliable product for us, and I would recommend it to anyone!"

"When the templates are used, there is not much left to configure and they just work!"

"From my personal experience, many firewalls provide Load Balancing functionalities, but Kemp Loadmaster has a lot of features and functionalities like what you can configure. So there are a lot of features but we use only five percent of it."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"Uplynk has positively impacted our organization by bringing us more viewership, as it does not glitch and stays stable during spikes in viewership, leading to approximately a 15 to 20 percent increase in viewership because there's no lag and nothing fails."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

Cons

"They were still in the process of development, and for example, we set it up in a cluster. So it was one logistical unit built out of two physical devices. And the expected behavior, which I know from other devices, will be formed into a logic cluster. It's that you configure one unit. Then you bring the second unit into this cluster with the already configured primary unit. So the secondary box pulls all the configured ones from its neighbor, does everything automatically, and then synchronizes with this primary neighbor. And then it works, like, one logical unit. And this didn't work with the Kemp's initially, where they caused a lot of issues when building up a cluster, so there were some specials on how to set this up. When we built or set them up for the first time and the months afterward with no new software releases, there were a couple of problems, but in the end, they worked fine. So, they developed a lot and learned from what they've responded to, what we responded to them, and what needs fixing."

"Some documentation is out of date versus the new version, and things have been moved."

"It needs to offer support for more business applications."

"The configuration of the basic services is pretty straight forward but for more complex solutions, there needs to be better documentation or knowledge base articles."

"Over the last several major versions, the GUI has remained virtually unchanged and still seems lacking."

"If I had to pick an area for improvement, I think it would be direct integration with the template library."

"The only thing that I miss is that the TMG server was giving me live information about who is connected and what is the request about."

"So far, the only hitch we have run into is that would have been nice to have an easier method to add allow/whitelist entries into the Access Control lists for virtual services."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

"To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work."

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is alright and we pay a monthly licensing fee"

"It has a very attractive ratio of price/performance."

"The costs for the Kemp Load Balancer solution are okay because, for a good product, you have to spend money."

"Download Kemp's VLM trial and take it for a test drive; you will be impressed."

"Nowadays, going with the virtual appliance is the easiest way and the cost is reasonable."

"KEMP gives away free trials for 30 days. This can be stretched if you want. During the test, you will have access to KEMP support."

"I have control on the licensing and all the prices since I work for a partner."

"They have multiple tiers of licensing and you can upgrade it easily."

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?

Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

I wasn't a part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing discussions, but from what I heard from my colleagues, they said it was really good and it was fair, so they went with that.

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work. Uplynk is very complex software with many moving pieces. If you're a big company, Uplynk...

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

My main use case for Uplynk is live channels around the clock. Since we're in the television business, we're constantly showcasing shows, and it's a continuous operation.

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 12% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 7% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 9% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Kemp LoadMaster

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Kemp LoadMaster enhances server performance by providing secure, intuitive load balancing solutions with easy deployment. It supports high availability, integrates seamlessly with IT infrastructure, and ensures optimal traffic distribution for critical applications.

Kemp LoadMaster is known for its ease of use and high-level security capabilities, making it ideal for managing multiple servers. Its intuitive interface simplifies configuration for load balancing and reverse proxy across multi-site Exchange, while the Edge Security Pack distinguishes between critical infrastructure and public internet. Supporting seamless service continuity and effective traffic distribution, it significantly boosts server performance through SSL offloading and intelligent monitoring. However, improvements are desired in stability and reporting, as well as in security features such as a robust Web Application Firewall and more intuitive logging and monitoring.

What are Kemp LoadMaster's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface simplifies server management.
Security Capabilities: Edge Security Pack aids infrastructure security.
Load Balancing: Ensures effective traffic distribution.
High Availability: Supports seamless service continuity.
SSL Offloading: Enhances server performance through encryption management.

What Benefits and ROI Should You Look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined configuration for better operational effectiveness.
Enhanced Security: Protects infrastructure with advanced security options.
Optimized Performance: Intelligent monitoring results in improved server output.
Service Continuity: High availability ensures uninterrupted operations.

Kemp LoadMaster is implemented across industries that require robust IT infrastructure management. Organizations use it for load balancing in Exchange environments, securing web servers, and maintaining high availability for public sector services. It supports applications like RDP, SQL, DNS, SharePoint, Citrix, and VoIP, ensuring security and high performance.

Progress Software

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Sample Customers

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Kemp LoadMaster vs. Uplynk